Answer:
The Atlantic ocean
Explanation:
how did historical context influence the equal protection clause?
The historical context of the Equal Protection Clause is closely tied to the events leading up to and during the Civil War.
The Equal Protection Clause is part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was adopted in 1868 following the Civil War. The amendment was designed to protect the rights of newly freed slaves and ensure that they were treated equally under the law.
Prior to the Civil War, the Supreme Court had ruled in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case that African Americans were not considered citizens and therefore did not have the same rights as white citizens. The Equal Protection Clause was specifically designed to overturn this decision and ensure that all citizens, regardless of race, were treated equally under the law.
The historical context of the Civil War and the fight for racial equality played a significant role in the development of the Equal Protection Clause. Without this historical context, the Equal Protection Clause may not have been included in the Fourteenth Amendment or may have been written differently.
If you need to learn more about Equal Protection Clause click here;
https://brainly.com/question/2232307
#SPJ11
Which concern resulted in the U.S. congress rejecting membership in the league of nations?
a. Economic depression in other nations would threaten the U.S. economy.
b. Conflicts in other countries would lead to U.S. involvement in another war.
c. Dictatorial governments would have increased influence on U.S. politics.
d. U.S. companies would hurt the economy by outsourcing labor.
Answer:
Economic depression in other nations would threaten the U.S. economy.
Explanation:
Read this passage from a speech given by
Stephen Douglas.
What is Douglas describing in this passage?
O The terms of the Wilmot Proviso
O The concept of popular sovereignty
O The impact of the Dred Scott ruling
What is the amount of time benjamin franklin allowed himself to master virtues he outlined?(gradpoint)
Two years
30 weeks
13 weeks
One year
Answer:
None of those. its one week
Explanation:
Franklin allowed himself one week to acquire each new virtue
read the following statement and decide whether or not material included in the statement requires citation/acknowledgement by the student writer. joseph j. roberts served as the first president of liberia.
The statement "Joseph J. Roberts served as the first president of Liberia" does not require a citation or acknowledgment by the student writer.
This is because the information is considered common knowledge, meaning that it is widely known and accepted as true without the need for a source or reference.Common knowledge includes basic historical facts, well-known scientific principles, and generally accepted cultural traditions.
In the case of Joseph J. Roberts, his status as the first president of Liberia is a widely known historical fact that can be easily verified through a simple search or found in many reputable sources.In academic writing, it is important to properly acknowledge sources when using information that is not considered common knowledge.
This includes statistics, quotes, and ideas that are not widely known or accepted. Failing to properly cite sources can result in plagiarism, which is a serious academic offense. Therefore, it is always best to err on the side of caution and cite sources whenever there is any doubt about whether or not it is necessary.
To know more about statement visit:
https://brainly.com/question/33442046
#SPJ11
in his contingency theory, fred fiedler refers to _____ as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization.
In his contingency theory, fred fiedler refers to "Position Power" as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization.
Fiedler's contingency theory refers to "Position Power" as the formal authority granted to a leader by an organization. Position Power is considered a key factor in determining a leader's ability to make decisions and lead effectively. Position Power is composed of two components: legitimate power, which is derived from an individual's role, position, or title; and reward power, which is the ability to reward or punish the followers for their obedience or disobedience.
Fiedler believed that the effectiveness of a leader was based on the amount of influence their position grant, and that their effectiveness could be increased or decreased based on the type of position they had. He argued that a leader's ability to influence followers was largely based on how much power their position granted, with higher positions contributing to greater chance of successful outcomes. Fiedler's view of Position Power helps to explain why some individuals are able to lead effectively, while others are not. The higher the position, the greater the potential for successful outcomes.
To know more about Fiedler's contingency theory , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/31441506
#SPJ4
The political significance of the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise was to Group of answer choices transfer power from the Senate majority leader to the vice president. exacerbate tensions between the New England merchants and the southern planters. reinforce the unity of the New England merchants and the southern planters. increase public support for the establishment of a national bank.
The political importance of the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise was to "reinforce the unity of the New England merchants and the southern planters."
This is evident in the fact that the Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise solved the issue of slave population and representation in Congress among the American States.
The Great Compromise solved the issue of differences in States' population towards their representation in Congress.
On the other hand, Three-Fifths Compromise solved the issue of slaves being counted as part of the population.
It was concluded that a 3 out of 5 slaves population would be counted.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option C "reinforce the unity of the New England merchants and the southern planters."
Learn more here: https://brainly.com/question/5172111
create three maps showing world empires in 1600, 1750, and 1900.
In 1600, world empires included the Ottoman Empire, the Ming Dynasty in China, and the Spanish Empire. By 1750, the British Empire, the French Empire, and the Russian Empire had emerged. By 1900, the British Empire, the Russian Empire, and the growing influence of the United States marked the world empires.
In 1600, several significant empires dominated the world stage. The Ottoman Empire controlled vast territories in the Middle East, North Africa, and southeastern Europe. The Ming Dynasty in China held power and influence over East Asia, while the Spanish Empire, through its conquests, had established colonies and controlled territories in the Americas, including large parts of Central and South America.
By 1750, the geopolitical landscape had undergone significant changes. The British Empire had risen to prominence, expanding its colonial holdings across various regions, including North America, the Caribbean, parts of South Asia, and parts of Africa. The French Empire also had a significant presence, with colonies in North America, the Caribbean, and parts of Africa. The Russian Empire had expanded its territory in Eurasia, encompassing vast areas of Eastern Europe and northern Asia.
By 1900, the world saw the continued growth and influence of certain empires. The British Empire had reached its zenith, controlling territories around the globe, including India, Australia, Canada, and parts of Africa. The Russian Empire, despite facing internal challenges, still maintained control over vast territories in Eastern Europe and Siberia. The United States, emerging as a global power, had started to exert its influence through its growing economic and military strength, particularly in the Americas and the Pacific.
It's important to note that these are simplified descriptions of world empires during the given time periods, and there were various other regional powers and smaller empires that existed alongside them.
Learn more about economic : brainly.com/question/14355320
#SPJ11
which best describes the history of the reception of handel’s messiah?
The history of the reception of Handel's Messiah is quite remarkable. Upon its initial success in Dublin in 1742, the work remained popular through the centuries to become a staple of the Western classical repertoire.
After its initial success, Messiah was performed frequently in London and throughout Europe. Various notable musicians included the work in their repertoires, highlighted by Mozart, who performed conducting Messiah twice in a few years. Towards the end of the 18th century, the Messiah became associated with Christian services in many regions, and Handel himself was eventually buried in Westminster Abbey.
Today, Messiah is one of the most popular and important works of classical music, having been performed countless times in churches, cathedrals, and concert halls around the world.
To know more about Handel's Messiah, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30798075
#SPJ4
The Question
What describes the history of the reception of handel’s messiah?
Winston Churchill's reaction to the 1938 Munich Agreement was...
A)to threaten war with Germany should Hitler continue his aggression.
B)to warn Neville Chamberlain that war was inevitable.
to declare war on Germany, thus beginning World War II.
to keep silent and let Germany handle its own affairs.
Answer:
B to warn Neville Chamberlain that war was inevitable.
Explanation:
edge 2021
Winston Churchill's reaction to the 1938 Munich Agreement was to warn Neville Chamberlain that war was inevitable. Thus, option (b) is correct.
Who is Winston Churchill's?Winston Churchill's was the born on the November 30, 1874, and the died on the January 24, 1965. He was the soldier and the writer. He was also the twice of the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom. The first time period was the 1940 to 1945 and the second period was the 1951 to 1955.
According to Winston Churchill, the Munich Agreement was recited in 1938. The Munich Conference was the result of extensive deliberation. Adolf Hitler was persuaded to change his mind by British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. On March 7, 1936, Adolf Hitler violated the conditions of the Versailles Treaty by committing troops to the Rhineland.
As a result, the Winston Churchill's reaction to the 1938 Munich Agreement was to warn Neville Chamberlain that war was inevitable. Therefore, option (b) is correct.
Learn more about on Winston Churchill's, here:
https://brainly.com/question/946683
#SPJ5
!!!! Who felt that competing colonialism had intensified hostilities and rivalries among European powers and contributed to the start of World War I?
Karl Marx
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Woodrow Wilson
Harry S. Truman
“As cities grew, local bosses gained more and more clout.” What does clout most likely mean here?
As cities grew, local bosses gained more clout, which means they gained power.
What is the meaning of Clout?Clout is simply meaning to power, it means power to influence someone. Refer to the above line, local business that are established within the particular cities gained more power in comparison to the another bosses.
Therefore, the power is the best meaning of Clout here.
To learn more about the clout, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/11751890
#SPJ2
what was the significance of the battle of bloody marsh?
A) the battle ended years of the war between the highland scots and the salzburgers
B) As a defensive buffer, Georgia ended the Spanish threat from Florida
C) The fear of a slave revolt in the Georgia colony was ended
D) A colony that was governed by a set of twenty one trustees
Answer:
Explanation:
C
Explain why the British and French became involved in Crimean War?
Answer:
France, having provoked the crisis for prestige purposes, used the war to cement an alliance with Britain and to reassert its military power
Answer:
british had beef with french french tried to take there land.
Explanation:
in 1842 french tried to take britsh land.
What do Tarbell and Rockefeller agree on in these two readings?
Standard Oil received rebates from railroad
companies.
Standard Oil did not receive rebates from railroad companies. Rebates made little difference to the profits of
Standard Oil.
The correct answer is A) Standard Oil received rebates from the railroad companies.
Tarbell and Rockefeller agree on "Standard Oil received rebates from railroad companies.
John Rockefeller was the owner of the Standard Oil Company, a monopoly that controlled the oil industry in the United States. He was growing and growing, buying other companies until he became the absolute owner of the oil business in America. The Oil Standard Company was a key player during the Gilded Age with other monopolistic companies such as the Steel Company owned by Andrew Carnegie.
lamentably, it is an historical fact that privileged groups seldom give up their privileges voluntarily. individuals may see the moral light and voluntarily give up their unjust posture, but, as reinhold niebuhr1 has reminded us, groups tend to be more immoral than individuals
Martin Luther King Jr. was an American Baptist minister and activist, one of the most prominent leaders in the civil rights movement from 1955 until his assassination in 1968.
To all the more likely comprehend how we capability as people and in gatherings, we should simply focus on ourselves and our own way of behaving. Have you at any point been so affected by your partners that you found in yourself the boldness to accomplish something you could never do assuming you were distant from everyone else? I accept I can securely express the vast majority of us has had an encounter like that. There is the pleasant youngster who finishes tormenting another decent youngster basically on the grounds that his companions are doing as such. There is the worker who observes something wrong yet stays silent about it since others let him know that is the manner in which things have forever been.
While organizing our qualities with the ones of a specific gathering (family, companions, collaborators and so on), we will undoubtedly have clashes. Sadly, the gathering assessment will in general win as we feel threatened by being the various ones. Being different is frightening; we realize what befalls the individuals who are unique. They are harassed. They are not welcome to parties. They don't date. They are discouraged. Those horrendous realities keep us from understanding, or possibly conceding, that the gathering isn't correct all the time. It is just a tad absurd 100% of the time.
Carl Gustav Jung, in his book "The Archetypes and The Collective Unconscious" discusses the comedian, a mediocre part of character that has a place in the aggregate oblivious, being a piece of us all. The comedian, as the name recommends, has no upright, no comprehension of outcomes. Jung guarantees that we will quite often stir the joke artist when in gatherings. Maybe we fail to remember what our identity is, our feeling of being an individual, and jump into this crude, carnal side of ourselves. The comedian permits an honest resident, for example, to go ahead and beat the other group's fan in a soccer arena. He just does it since he is affected by the gathering and what the gathering feels. What's more, at that point, the gatherings felt rage towards the other gathering.
At the point when Dr. King claims in his "Letter from Birmingham Prison" that "It's undeniably true that special gatherings only occasionally surrender their honors deliberately. People might see the ethical light and willfully surrender their uncalled for act, yet bunches will more often than not be more unethical than people," he is fundamentally expressing a similar guideline above. Individuals in bunches feel strong. They feel upheld, protected in realizing there are other people who share similar sentiments. Regardless of whether they share the gathering's sentiments, they have a solid sense of reassurance and embraced by having a place. It's just natural, since not having a place with a gathering a lot of implied ceasing to exist in the woods in old times.
Know more about Martin L King - https://brainly.com/question/14154755
#SPJ4
TRUE/FALSE.Hitler and Mussolini increased their nations' military strength to lift them from an economic depression.
True, Hitler and Mussolini increased their nations' military strength to lift them from an economic depression.
Adolf Hitler, as the leader of Nazi Germany, aimed to establish a totalitarian regime and pursue territorial expansion. He used militarization as a means to assert German dominance and implement his vision of Aryan supremacy. Economic recovery in Nazi Germany was largely driven by rearmament and war-related industries, but it was not the primary objective.
Similarly, Benito Mussolini, the leader of Fascist Italy, sought to revive the glory of the Roman Empire and establish a fascist state. He pursued militarization to enhance Italy's influence and project power in the Mediterranean region. However, the economic depression in Italy under Mussolini's rule was largely fueled by state intervention and corporatism, rather than solely relying on military strength.
For further information on Economic Depression visit :
https://brainly.com/question/9446191
#SPJ11
The photo shows mussolini and his supporters in italy. a photo of benito mussolini and other men marching. all of them are wearing black shirts. many of the men are holding banners. supporters who used violence and intimidation to help mussolini seize power were called blackshirts. blackpants. black corps. black brigades.
Supporters who used violence and intimidation to help Mussolini seize power were called Blackshirts.
Fascism is a term used to describe a form of governance in which a dictator imposes his or her will by coercion and frequently violence, controls all business and industry, and fosters nationalism and frequently racism.
First off, Italian fascism—also referred to as classical fascism or just fascism—is the original fascist philosophy that Giovanni Gentile and Benito Mussolini formed in Italy. Benito Mussolini believed that fascism would organise people under state control and that democracy was a failed system, as were freedom of speech and the right to form political parties.
For such more question on Mussolini.
https://brainly.com/question/29831608
#SPJ4
Answer:
Blackshirts.
Explanation:
The answer above is correct.
What role did Catharine Beecher believe women should play in reform
movements?
A. They should share equal responsibility with men.
B. They should lead reform movements.
C. They should be subordinate to men.
D. They should only lead certain movements.
SUBMIT
Answer:
C
Explanation:
She subscribed to the ideology of separate spheres, where men were responsible for public life and women were confined to the domestic sphere. Beecher emphasized women's moral influence within the home and their role as educators, but she did not advocate for women to lead reform movements. Her views reflected the prevailing beliefs of her time, although they may be seen as restrictive by modern standards.
26
Which statement best describes Renaissance art?
А.Renaissance art emphasized effect over content.
B.Renaissance art avoided religious themes and figures.
с.Renaissance art featured human beings in their natural environment.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
Answer:
the answer is c
Explanation:
i took the test on edge
In war time , why did people punish people for doing something wrong ?
Answer:
I think you mean Warcrimes, because it's unhuman to do what some people do, they commit war crimes. Wars have rules, something like that. Warcrimes are breaking the rules. They are unlawful and unhuman
In September 1947, the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) subpoenaed approximately 80 Hollywood screen writers, directors, and producers. Only 10 of the people who were summoned appeared before the committee and became known as the Hollywood 10. The members of the committee asked them about their union memberships and if they had ever been members of the Communist Party. The people being interrogated refused to answer these questions. They also refused to name anyone they knew who might be favorable toward Communist views. Even though they had broken no laws, the 10 were found in contempt, heavily fined, and sentenced to jail terms. They were also blacklisted in Hollywood, and most had great difficulty making a living. Many other workers in the film industry were later fired because they were suspected of being Communists
The Hollywood Ten was a group of ten screenwriters, directors, and producers who were held in contempt of Congress and blacklisted from the film industry due to their refusal to answer questions regarding their Communist Party membership during the era of McCarthyism.
The Hollywood Ten were summoned before the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) in September 1947, which had been established to investigate Communist influence in the United States. The committee demanded to know if they were members of the Communist Party and if they had attended Communist Party meetings. All ten witnesses refused to answer the questions posed by the committee. As a result, they were charged with contempt of Congress and jailed for a year.
They were also blacklisted by the Hollywood studio bosses. The Communist Party of the United States (CPUSA) was a Marxist-Leninist political party in the United States. During the late 1940s and early 1950s, McCarthyism led to a Red Scare, during which many people were accused of being Communists or having Communist sympathies. This resulted in the persecution of many people who were thought to have ties to the Communist Party, including members of the Hollywood Ten and many other workers in the film industry.
To learn more about Hollywood Ten, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31296615
#SPJ11
What unknown locations did Christopher Columbus mistake for Asia and an island off of China.
Answer:
hello
Explanation:
Actually he discovered America but thought it is Asia please follow me hope that helps you
Which of the following describes the division of government into three branches.
A. Separation of Powers
B. Limited Government
C. Checks and Balances
D. Federalism
Answer:
A-Separation of Powers
Explanation:
In law, Separation of Powers can be regarded as division of government into three branches.
Separation of powers serves as division of government responsibilities into different sections so as to avoid putting a power on just one sections
The reasons for this is prevent the concentration of power.And to provide for checks and balances among leaders.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about
Separation of Powers at:https://brainly.com/question/2699625
The economy is in recession. Prices are high and increasing, as are unemployment rates. The Fed has already cut interest rates, but it isn’t working.Congress has yet to act. You are a member of Congress.
Generally speaking, what do you propose?
Answer:
Goverenment created jobs or funding government projects that would require people to be hired to fill the positions. Forgive mortages or student loans. Increase unemployment benefits or the amount of time you can receive them,
Explanation:
Which ruler promoted religious diversity in the Ottoman Empire? Group of answer choices
Suleiman I
Akbar
Aurangzeb
Mehmed II
Answer: Mehmed II
Explanation: Hope this helps <3
Just if you want points How old is the universe?
Mesopotamia
What is Mesopotamia?
Answer:
Mesopotamia literally means "between the rivers" in ancient Greek. ... Upper Mesopotamia, also known as the Jezirah, is the area between the Euphrates and the Tigris from their sources down to Baghdad. Lower Mesopotamia is the area from Baghdad to the Persian Gulf.
Explanation:
Answer:
Mesopotamia is the region in the Middle East between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers. Mesopotamia today consists of Iraq, northeast Syria, Southeast Anatolia Region and southwest Iran. The region, most of which remains within the borders of today's Iraq, has been the cradle of many civilizations in
A historian is interested in learning about the ancient Roman Coliseum, an arena where trained combatants fought each other for spectator entertainment. Many gladiators were slaves who were forced to fight to the death with other people and even wild animals. The historian has difficulty understanding how anyone could enjoy, or even tolerate, seeing such things! The historian concludes that ancient Roman culture must have been significantly more tolerant of violence and slavery than modern American culture. This conclusion is an example of what historical skill?
A. Access to primary sources
B. Use of contextualisation
C. Establishing the point of view
D. Detection of bias
The conclusion for the passage is an example of a historical skill which is use of contextualization. Hence the correct option is B.
What is term called Roman culture?Rome culture is an broad mix of high culture, the arts, fashion and historic architecture. Daily life centers around enduring Rome traditions rich in religion and food on the continent of Europe.
Using this historical skill the historian would interpret the reasons as to why the Roman Empire could allow battle fights. In the eyes of Roman Empire: fighting for power, win, justice, challenge for the Empire -and prosperity.
The best historical skill is "though the eyes" of Roman Empire on the continent of Europe. In other words how did the Roman people react to brutal violence of hurting one another in battles of parties-of 2 sides.
Therefore, the correct option is B.
Learn more about Roman Culture here:
https://brainly.com/question/13764380
#SPJ1
How did Theodosius expand upon Constantine’s policies?
He forced non-Christians to leave the empire.
He declared Sunday the Christian day of rest.
He waged war against non-Christian peoples.
He made Christianity the official religion of Rome.
Answer:
he made Christianity the official religion of Rome
Explanation:
I hope this helped
Answer:
he made Christianity the official religion of Rome
Explanation: