Answer:
D. Venezuela
Explanation:
New Zealand and Finland are the two least corrupt countries in the world. According to recent gatherings, Venezuela has a signficantly higher corruption than Australia - it is currently ranked 5th in the world with a corruption score of 14. That being said, Venezuela has the highest corruption.
BRAINLIEST please if this helped!Answer:
d
Explanation:
According to 2020Corruption Perceptions Index venezuela lies in 4th position from most corrupt countries in the world.
4. How did the judge justify not appointing Gideon a lawyer?
Answer:
Florida law only permitted counsel of poor defendants charged with capital offenses. Therefore, his habeas corpus petition was denied.
Explanation:
Gideon v. Wainright
Supreme Court ruled that the 6th amendment's guarantee of counsel corresponds with the 14th amendment (made obligatory) by the states. In other words, the 6th amendment guarantees the defendant the right to the assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings. Finally, the states had to provide counsel.
Prompt: Can multiple people interpret the same law differently and still be correct? Provide an example.
A factor in competence NOT mentioned by Pope and Vasquez
(2016) is
a) knowledge.
b) technical skills.
c) experience.
d) emotional competence.
Answer:
Experience
Explanation:
Competence often has a very broad meaning but it is widely used to describe a person's abititu or capacity to perform a particular task effectively and efficiently. The result of a person's work will enable us measure his or her competence in that area or field of work. According to pope and Vasquez, to be competent, then some factirs have to be in play as competence is independent of certain factors, the factors highlighted include ; knowledge which is a measure of what an individual knows about a task or project ; also mentioned by Pope and Vasquez are technical skill and Emotional competence, leaving out experience
Cagney and Lacey enter into a written contract to open a bookstore specializing in detective novels. The written contract is a 2-paragraph handwritten document, and states that each party will receive 50% of any net profits and that each will devote 30 hours a week to the business. Both parties regard the writing as a final expression of their deal. After being in business for a while, Cagney sues Lacey for breach because Lacey is only working 20 hours per week during the summer months. Lacy attempts to present evidence that shows just prior to signing the contract, Cagney orally agreed that Lacey could work 20 hours a week when her children were on vacation from school. Will Lacey be able to present this evidence at trial?
is our CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM is fair? why or why not
Explanation:
The majority of Americans, for example, have more trust and confidence in the police than they have in almost any other institution. However, opinions of the police have long been lower in areas where crime is most heavily concentrated. ... The U.S. criminal justice system is more fair and effective than ever.
What is the maximum punishment for murder under UK law?
Answer:
life sentence or life in prison
Which style of communication should officers maintain?
-Aggressive
-Passive
-Assertive
-Passive-aggressive
the family and small business taxpayer protection act
The Internal Revenue Service's projected expansion under the Price Reduction Act of 2022 would be repealed by the planned United States law known as the Family and Small Company Taxpayer Protection Act.
It was the first piece of legislation to be presented to the 118th Congress. Republicans are preventing the Biden government from deploying 87,000 additional IRS agents to target individuals, families, and small companies, as well as their unheard-of rise in IRS audits.
The "Family and Local Business Taxpayer Protection" Act increases the services that Americans expect from their government while canceling all new IRS funding that burdens middle-class families and small businesses. Instead of focusing on them, the IRS must be committed to offering taxpayers high-quality services.
With the nonpartisan Taxpayer First Act, which was signed into law in 2019, House Republicans successfully oversaw significant IRS reforms. Democrats abandoned those measures in favor of massively subsidizing the IRS with an additional $80 billion on top of its $12 billion annual budget.
Learn more about taxpayer protection here:
https://brainly.com/question/8278976
#SPJ4
Most courts treat contracts for services as being included under the UCC. True False
The statement "Most courts treat contracts for services as being included under the UCC" is FALSE because the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) governs the sale of goods, not services.
The UCC is a model code in the US that seeks to establish a uniform set of laws for commercial transactions throughout the country. The UCC governs the sales of goods, which are tangible and movable items, but it does not cover contracts for services.
These contracts are subject to the common law principles of contract law, which vary from state to state. The UCC is concerned with the formation and enforcement of contracts for the sale of goods and regulates issues such as warranties, risk of loss, and remedies for breach.
Hence, courts do not treat contracts for services as included under the UCC.
Learn more about courts https://brainly.com/question/8433911
#SPJ11
The given statement, "Most courts treat contracts for services as being included under the UCC," is false because most courts do not treat contracts for services as being included under the UCC. Only contracts for the sale of goods are included in the UCC (Uniform Commercial Code).
Services contracts are treated differently and are subject to different laws and regulations. The UCC, or Uniform Commercial Code, is a set of laws governing commercial transactions. It is a model law that has been adopted by all states in the United States except Louisiana, which has its own civil law system. The UCC covers the sale of goods, negotiable instruments, secured transactions, and other commercial matters.
Contract law governs service contracts, which are agreements between a service provider and a customer for the performance of a particular service. Service contracts are typically more complex than sales contracts, and they involve a greater degree of customization and negotiation.
Learn more about Contract law: https://brainly.com/question/27899951
#SPJ11
Dana publically states that Jill was arrested for theft, when she wasn't. Special damages
Group of answer choices
A- will be assumed as it's slander per se.
B- will be awarded because slanderous statements have the quality of permanence.
C- will likely be awarded for Jill's pain and suffering.
D- must be proven to establish Dana's liability.
Dana publicly stating that Jill was arrested for theft, when she wasn't, is a case of slander. In this situation, special damages: must be proven to establish Dana's liability. So the right option is (D) must be proven to establish Dana's liability.
Slander per se refers to statements that are so harmful that damages are presumed, but this typically involves accusations of serious crimes, unchastity, or affecting one's profession. Theft is not necessarily considered slander per se. Therefore, option A is incorrect.
Option B is also incorrect because slanderous statements do not possess the quality of permanence. This characteristic is attributed to libel, which involves written defamatory statements.
Option C is not accurate, as special damages are awarded for specific, quantifiable monetary losses resulting from the slander, not for pain and suffering. General damages might cover pain and suffering, but special damages need to be proven.
In conclusion, for Jill to be awarded special damages, she must prove the monetary losses incurred as a direct result of Dana's slanderous statement.
For more questions on: liability
https://brainly.com/question/30638370
#SPJ11
The correct answer is D. Dana's statement that Jill was arrested for theft when she wasn't can be considered slanderous. In order to establish Dana's liability, Jill will need to prove that the statement caused her harm.
This harm may include not only damage to her reputation but also any tangible losses she suffered as a result of the statement, which is known as special damages. Special damages are those that can be quantified, such as lost wages or expenses incurred due to the statement. In this case, if Jill lost her job or clients as a result of Dana's statement, she may be able to claim special damages. It is important to note that slander per se refers to statements that are inherently harmful, such as accusations of a crime or immoral behavior. In these cases, the plaintiff does not need to prove actual harm in order to establish liability. However, in this case, Jill will need to prove that she suffered harm as a result of Dana's statement.
To know more about slanderous
https://brainly.com/question/14634806
#SPJ11
Fifteen-year-old Tanya entered an 'apprenticeship' contract for three years which required her to train 12 hours a day, seven days a week and perform only in shows arranged by Ramona, a famous ballet teacher. In return, Ramona promised to provide Tanya with room and board and £25 a week spending money. Ramona had an option to renew the contract for another three years. When she turned 17, Tanya took up a part-time position as a cheerleader for a basketball club and this caused her to miss some lessons and ballet performances. Ramona sued Tanya for breach of her contract of service. Advise Tanya whether Ramona is likely to succeed in your jurisdiction.
The advise that should be given to Tanya in this situation is the fact that she cannot be sued by Ramona due to the fact that the contract can be considered as a voidable one.
What is a voidable contract?
This a contract that was entered between two parties that may not be enforceable due to several existing legal reasons.
This contract is voidable due to the age of Tanya. She was 15 when she entered the contract. This age is considered as a minor age.
Read more on contracts here: https://brainly.com/question/984979
Which statement best describes a difference between a democracy and a republic?
All board members have 3 fundamental duties a)duty of care, b)duty of loyalty and, c)duty of obedience. If any 2 or more of these duties become in conflict which duty should take preference over other(s) and why?
How did the supreme court’s ruling in the trans-missouri freight association case strengthen the federal government’s power?.
The Supreme Court's ruling in the Trans-Missouri Freight Association case strengthen the federal government's power---- It upheld the Sherman Antitrust Act's authority over railroads.
Federal government :The Federal Government is composed of three distinct branches: legislative, executive, and judicial, whose powers are vested by the U.S. Constitution in the Congress, the President, and the Federal courts, respectively. There are hundreds of Federal agencies and commissions charged with handling responsibilities as varied as managing America’s space program, protecting its forests, gathering intelligence, and advancing the general welfare of the American people.
Trans-Missouri Freight Association :Trans-Missouri Freight Association, 166 U.S. 290 (1897), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the Sherman Act (which was an antitrust measure that prohibited anti competitive behavior in commerce) applied to the railroad industry, even though the U.S. Congress had enacted a comprehensive regime .
Learn more about federal government power:
brainly.com/question/860014
#SPJ4
what are the marine corps general orders?
The general orders made by the Marine Corps are in the sense of reporting the violation of order to be instructed and enforced upon in that sense.
The general orders may be ideally taken interpretation for better understanding as the orders that can be made by the authorities under the general capacities in all conditions and situations related thereto. It is noteworthy to mention that the general orders and special orders are completely in contrast to each other.
Learn more about general orders here:
https://brainly.com/question/30396842
#SPJ4
De jure discrimination and de facto discrimination are two ways in which some Americans are treated as less equal than others. Examples of public policies designed to address each of these forms of discrimination are
a. affirmative action (de jure), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto).
b. the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de jure), and the Brown decision (de facto).
c. the Supreme Court's busing decisions (de jure), and affirmative action decisions (de facto).
d. None of these answers is correct.
e. the Brown decision (de jure), and affirmative action (de facto).
Affirmative action (de jure), and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto) are examples of public policies designed to address each of these forms of discrimination. The correct answer is A.
What is De jure discrimination?De jure discrimination is racial discrimination that is based on laws and government policies. De jure segregation, which was supported by Jim Crow laws, was a prevalent practice in America's history. Laws that restricted African Americans' rights to vote, own property, and work were in place in the Jim Crow South.
What is De facto discrimination?De facto discrimination is a type of discrimination that is not based on laws but rather on societal norms, patterns, and prejudices. In the United States, it has been a major problem for many years. It can be seen in the fact that minorities often earn less, are less likely to be hired or promoted, and are more likely to suffer from certain health conditions.
Affirmative action (de jure) and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (de facto) are two examples of public policies designed to address each of these forms of discrimination. The Brown decision (de jure) and affirmative action (de facto) is another alternative.
Therefore, the correct option is (e) the Brown decision (de jure), and affirmative action (de facto).
Learn more about public policies
https://brainly.com/question/14616070
#SPJ11
If a judge bases his or her final decision on existing law, it is an example of common law; what is the decision called that a judge arrives at from a case with unique circumstances?
Answer:
Explanation:
A prior ruling or judgment on any case is known as a precedent.
1. What were the Articles of Confederation?civics
Confederation stated regarding the thirteen colonies that were present and all were to be joined together with equal rights.
What are the Articles of Confederation?The Articles established a federal union of independent states with a meager central administration that delegated most authority to the state legislatures.
The thirteen colonies were aware that they required some kind of formal authority to bring them all together. They desired codified regulations that were accepted by all the regions. The Articles granted Congress the authority to establish a militia, pass laws, and generate money, among other responsibilities.
Learn more about the Articles of Confederation, Here:
brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ1
How do political parties help candidate win elections?
Answer:
the political parties support the candidate and help with buying the materials to "put the candidate out there"
analyze the impact of gender based violence on individual or community
Answer:
lower productivity and thus reduced economic output and growth, and increased pressure on social and health services.
Explanation:
In __________, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
In criminal law, when a defendant enters a plea of guilty, the judge must determine whether the plea is knowingly entered and completely voluntary.
This requirement stems from the due process clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, which guarantees defendants the right to a fair and impartial trial. In order for a guilty plea to be valid, the defendant must have a full understanding of the charges against them, the consequences of their plea, and the rights they are waiving by pleading guilty. Additionally, the plea must not be the result of coercion or undue influence, such as promises of leniency or threats of harm.
The judge may conduct a colloquy with the defendant, which is a series of questions aimed at ensuring that the defendant is making a voluntary and informed decision to plead guilty. If the judge determines that the plea is not knowingly entered or completely voluntary, the plea may be withdrawn and the case may proceed to trial. Overall, the requirement that a guilty plea be knowingly entered and completely voluntary is an important safeguard in the criminal justice system, as it helps to ensure that defendants are not unfairly pressured into giving up their rights.
Learn more about law :
https://brainly.com/question/29553358
#SPJ11
The committee in the house that proposes time limitations on debate for bills is called the.
The committee in the house that proposes time limitations on debate for bills would be called the Rules Committee.
The procedure for bringing a piece of legislation to the floor, the number of amendments that will be taken into account, and the duration of the debate are all determined by the Rules Committee. Typically, the committee establishes the parameters for discussion and has the authority to waive any points of order that the House might otherwise raise in opposition to a bill or an amendment.
It is appropriate for the Speaker to maintain tight control over the Rules Committee because of its crucial role in regulating the legislative process. Original jurisdiction issues and special orders for consideration are the two main areas under which the Rules Committee has jurisdiction. The parameters of a measure's or matter's debate are set forth in a special rule.
Learn to know more about Debate on
https://brainly.com/question/20377585
#SPJ4
What is the probable cause for the Issuance of a warrant of arrest
Answer:
please make me brainalist and keep smiling dude I hope you will be satisfied with my answer
Explanation:
Courts usually find probable cause when there is a reasonable basis for believing that a crime may have been committed (for an arrest) or when evidence of the crime is present in the place to be searched (for a search). Under exigent circumstances, probable cause can also justify a warrantless search or seizure.
Negligence is classified as: Group of answer choices a punitive tort. an indefensible tort. an unintentional tort. an intentional tort.
The classification of negligence is an unintentional tort.
Negligence is a legal term used to describe a situation where an individual or entity fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm or injury to another person or property.
It is considered an unintentional tort because the person or entity responsible for the harm did not intend to cause it but failed to exercise reasonable care to prevent it from happening.
Negligence is often used as a basis for personal injury lawsuits, and the plaintiff must prove that the defendant had a duty of care, breached that duty by failing to exercise reasonable care, and caused the plaintiff's injuries or damages.
In many cases, negligence can result in compensatory damages, which are intended to compensate the injured party for their losses, such as medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering.
To know more about unintentional tort, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/14614720#
#SPJ11
what is agency by agreement in type of agency
Reserved powers are powers that are reserved for the federal government.
T
F
Answer:
reserved powers are powers reserved to the state Delegated powers are powers reserved to the federal government and Concurrent powers are powers reserved to both state and federal government
Explanation:
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Reserved powers are powers that are reserved for the state government.The powers which are reserved for federal government are Delegated powers.Mens rea examines the state of whose mind?
O The Defendant
O The Victim
O The Prosecutor
O The Witness
Which of the President's nine roles calls for him to set the nation's foreign policy?
Answer: The answer is Chief Diplomat
Explanation: Its him because the role of the President as Chief Diplomat is the one that calls him to set the nation's foreign policy, in fact, it makes him its main designer. His power is so large that his rulings are followed both by the US and foreign parties.
HAVE A GOOD DAY Y’ALL
Philosophy
How does determinism apply to our perception of the self?
Answer:
Explanation:
It applys Because determinsim is the events of everything so it would be the use of everything.
Brief the system of proportional representation
Explanation:
ROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION
Sections
HomePolitics, Law & GovernmentPolitics & Political Systems
Proportional representation
politics
Cite Share More
WRITTEN BY
The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Encyclopaedia Britannica's editors oversee subject areas in which they have extensive knowledge, whether from years of experience gained by working on that content or via study for an advanced degree....
See Article History
Proportional representation, electoral system that seeks to create a representative body that reflects the overall distribution of public support for each political party. Where majority or plurality systems effectively reward strong parties and penalize weak ones by providing the representation of a whole constituency to a single candidate who may have received fewer than half of the votes cast (as is the case, for example, in the United States), proportional representation ensures minority groups a measure of representation proportionate to their electoral support. Systems of proportional representation have been adopted in many countries, including Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Luxembourg, Norway, Russia, Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland.