Answers
When a company repatriates foreign earnings and repatriates cash, it may result in a higher tax bill, higher tax expense, and higher effective tax rate.
This is because repatriating foreign earnings involves bringing back profits earned in a foreign country to the company's home country, where it may be subject to additional taxes. The tax rate may be higher than the rate in the foreign country, resulting in a higher tax bill and expense. Additionally, repatriating cash may trigger taxes on dividends, capital gains, or other income. The company may also need to consider foreign tax credits or other tax planning strategies to minimize the tax impact of repatriated earnings. In summary, repatriating foreign earnings and cash can have significant tax implications, and companies need to carefully consider the tax consequences before making any decisions.
To know more about tax visit:
https://brainly.com/question/12611692
#SPJ11
Related Questions
the ____ is a general construction rule that states that fall protection is required
Answers
The General Industry Fall Protection Standard is a general construction rule that states that fall protection is required
This standard is issued by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in the United States and applies to various industries and workplaces to ensure the safety of workers at heights.Under this standard, employers are responsible for providing fall protection systems, such as guardrails, safety nets, or personal fall arrest systems, to protect workers from falls that could cause injury or death. The specific requirements for fall protection systems may vary depending on the nature of the work, the height of the elevated surface, and other relevant factors.It's important for employers and workers to adhere to these fall protection requirements to minimize the risk of falls and promote a safe working environment.Failure to comply with fall protection standards can result in penalties, citations, and legal consequences for employers. Workers should be trained on the proper use of fall protection equipment and follow safety protocols to prevent accidents and injuries related to falls.
To learn more about workers, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/30203906
#SPJ11
Who is the Chief Law Enforcement Officer in thr State of California???
Answers
Answer:
Attorney General Becerra
A woman looking at cosmetics in a drug store was noticed by the store
manager because she was not carrying a purse. She was pushing a
shopping cart and put several cosmetic items into the cart. She went to
the checkout stand and paid for all the items but one lipstick, which
remained in the shopping cart. The manager noticed the lipstick in the
cart and followed the female to her car. As the manager approached the
female, she was picking the lipstick up from the cart. When the manager
told her he was arresting her for shoplifting, she said that she did not see
the lipstick in the cart until she got to her car and picked it up to return it
to the store. The lipstick cost $5.99, and the female had $1.09 on her
person. Answer the following questions:
1. Was there any responsibility on the part of the clerk or manager to ensure that
all items were paid for because she left the store? Why, or why not? As to part of
the representative or supervisor, indeed, without a doubt, there exists an obligation. For the
explanation that chiefs ought to be
2. Should she be arrested? If so, on what charges, and why? If not, why not?
Write a statement reflecting your decision as though you were filling out a
police report.
3.
Answers
2. She should be arrested, for trying to steal. Even though she said she forgot it was there, she attempted to put it in her car and steal it. So this has to be a lie, she was indeed trying to steal the lipstick.
I didn’t think much about my answer but maybe you could use these as ideas for your Anders
When a person is Imprisoned, they have just lost their:
OA. life.
OB. liberty.
OC. right to appeal.
OD. 8th amendment rights.
Answers
Answer:
8th amendment rights
Explanation:
this is common knowledge
why is the term judicial administration multifaceted
Answers
Answer:
Judicial administration
Explanation:
Judicial administration consists of the practices, procedures and offices that deal with the management of the system of the courts. Judicial administration, or administration of the courts, has traditionally been concerned with overseeing budgets, selecting juror pools, assigning judges to cases, creating court calendars of activities, and supervising non-judicial personnel. Court administrators, or clerks of the court, accept the filing of court documents, maintain a file system of cases and a record of all final judgments, and process paperwork generated by judges. Court administrators are also responsible for eliminating racial and gender bias in the courts, ensuring diversity in the court system, and providing easier access to the courts for persons representing themselves without an attorney (pro se or pro per litigants).
Can I helpfull of you
What are the requirements for an individual to claim damages under the workers' compensation laws? (Check all that apply.)
The employer and employee are covered under the state workers' compensation system.
He or she must be an employee.
The injury occurred on the job.
Answers
Answer:
All of the above
Explanation:
All of the options are correct. The requirements for an individual to claim damages under the workers' compensation laws are:
The employer and employee are covered under the state workers' compensation system.
He or she must be an employee.
The injury occurred on the job.
What are the categories of controlled substances and how are they different from one another?
Answers
Controlled substances are drugs and other substances that are regulated by the government due to their potential for abuse and dependence, as well as their medical benefits. There are five categories, or schedules, of controlled substances in the United States, as defined by the Controlled Substances Act:
Schedule I: This category includes drugs that have no accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. Examples include heroin, LSD, and marijuana.
Schedule II: This category includes drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence, but also have some accepted medical uses. Examples include oxycodone, fentanyl, and Adderall.
Schedule III: This category includes drugs that have a moderate to low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include codeine and anabolic steroids.
Schedule IV: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include Xanax and Ambien.
Schedule V: This category includes drugs that have a low potential for abuse and dependence, and have accepted medical uses. Examples include cough medicines that contain codeine.
The categories are differentiated based on the substance's medical uses, potential for abuse, and likelihood of causing dependence. The stricter regulations on Schedule I substances reflect the fact that they are considered to have a higher potential for harm and abuse, while Schedule V substances are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse and dependence. The schedules are used to guide the regulation of these substances, including their manufacture, distribution, and prescription.
A) What three sentencing objectives is a judge supposed to downplay or minimize when they consider the accuse mental health as a mitigating factor?
b) What two objectives should the judge emphasize?
The sentencing objectives:
1. To denounce unlawful conduct
2. Specific deterrence & general deterrence
3. To separate dangerous offenders (think jail)
4. To rehabilitate offenders
5. To repair harms to victims and communities
6. To get offenders to acknowledge responsibility and the harm they have caused others
Answers
The fundamental purpose of sentencing is to contribute to the maintenance of a just, peaceful and safe society through the imposition of just sanctions. The court [shall/may] consider the following objectives in assessing the appropriate sentence to be imposed upon an offender: denouncing blameworthy behaviour.
Do you support or oppose the death penalty? Give me couple sentences and why.
Answers
Answer:
Well I do support the death penalty. Even thought it might sound harsh, I still belive in the fair law. Like what they did in the Persian empire, an eye for an eye. If you kill someone, sure you won’t be affected that much but their families won’t see you sitting in a cell for 2-3 life sentences and eventually being set free as a “justice is served” moment. In fact if you killed someone, you would be put to death. It also sets an example for other people to not convict this crime to prevent future murders or whatever violent and unlawful things that could be comed up with.
What was the issue in the Garratt v. Dailey case?
Answers
Answer:
The Garratt v. Dailey case involved the issue of intentional tort, specifically the tort of battery. In this case, the plaintiff, Brian Garratt, alleged that the defendant, Denny Dailey, intentionally and unlawfully pulled a chair from beneath him as he was attempting to sit down, causing him to fall and sustain injuries. The main question in the case was whether the defendant's actions constituted intentional battery, even though he claimed it was an accident. The court ultimately ruled in favor of the plaintiff, holding that the defendant's actions were indeed intentional and constituted battery, regardless of his intent to harm.
I believe this is your answer, I hope this helps!
how does human rights law differ from the law of war? (the law of war and other bodies of law
Answers
Human rights law and the law of war, also known as international humanitarian law, are two distinct legal frameworks that govern different aspects of human conduct in different contexts.
Human rights law is a body of international law that focuses on the protection and promotion of the inherent rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their nationality, ethnicity, gender, or any other status. It encompasses a wide range of civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights, such as the right to life, freedom of expression, equality, and non-discrimination. Human rights law applies during peacetime and in situations of armed conflict, and it places obligations on states to respect, protect, and fulfill the rights of individuals within their jurisdiction.
On the other hand, the law of war or international humanitarian law specifically deals with the rules and principles that apply during armed conflicts. It aims to regulate the conduct of parties to the conflict, including states and non-state armed groups, in order to limit the suffering caused by armed conflict and protect those who are not taking part in hostilities, such as civilians, prisoners of war, and the wounded. The law of war includes principles such as the distinction between combatants and civilians, prohibition of targeting civilians or using excessive force, and respect for humanitarian assistance and medical personnel.
While human rights law applies in both times of peace and conflict, the law of war specifically addresses the conduct of parties involved in armed conflicts and provides guidelines to mitigate the humanitarian impact of war. It is important to note that both frameworks complement each other and share common principles, such as the protection of human dignity and the prohibition of torture, genocide, and other grave crimes. However, the law of war focuses specifically on situations of armed conflict and the conduct of parties involved, while human rights law has a broader scope encompassing all aspects of human rights in various contexts.
Learn more about Human rights here:
https://brainly.com/question/30349401
#SPJ11
QUESTION:
You are a candidate attorney at a law firm in the process of consulting a client, Mr. Masuku. He informs you that he bought a vehicle from one Mr. Havenga, who makes a living by buying and selling secondhand cars. He further informs you that the trustee of Mr. Havenga however approached him (Mr. Masuku), took back the vehicle that he bought from Mr. Havenga and informed him that he is claiming the vehicle under section 29 of the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936. Mr. Masuku now seeks your advice on how to get the vehicle back.
During your research, you find that dispositions which may be set aside, include those not made for value, voidable preferences, undue preferences, collusive dealings, and those made in fraud of creditors.
1. Which of the dispositions above may be set aside in terms of the common law, and what is the relevant action that may be used to set the disposition aside? (2)
2. What must the trustee prove to set aside a disposition made for no value? (2)
3. Regarding the factual scenario above, advise your client what a section 29 disposition is, state whether there is an exception to section 29 that may protect him, and what that exception is. Lastly state which test is applied to determine whether the exception applies.(3)
4. State whether the following statement is true or false and provide a motivation for our answer:Referring to Collusive Dealings, 'collusion' in terms of section 31(1) of the Insolvency Act refers to any agreement with the results that one creditor is preferred over another. (3)
Answers
The common law allows for the setting aside of dispositions made in fraud of creditors. The relevant action that may be used to set the disposition aside is an action for the avoidance of a fraudulent preference.
How to set aside a disposition made?To set aside a disposition made for no value, the trustee must prove that the debtor was insolvent at the time of the disposition, that the disposition was made within six months of sequestration, and that the debtor did not receive any value in return for the disposition.
Section 29 of the Insolvency Act allows for the setting aside of dispositions made for no value within six months of sequestration. An exception to section 29 is the "running of the business exception", which may protect Mr. Masuku if he can prove that the vehicle was bought in the ordinary course of Mr. Havenga's business. The test applied to determine whether the exception applies is whether the transaction was entered into in the ordinary course of the seller's business.
False. Collusive dealings, in terms of section 31(1) of the Insolvency Act, refer to any agreement between a debtor and a creditor with the intent to defraud other creditors or to prefer one creditor over another.
Read more about common law here:
https://brainly.com/question/30128303
#SPJ1
a federal statute applies only to those states that agree to apply it within their borders.
Answers
A federal statute applies only to those states that agree to apply it within their borders - False.
Federal statutes are laws adopted by the United States Congress that apply to all states, territories, and possessions of the United States, whether or not a state decides to apply it inside its borders.
Federal law takes precedence over state law, and if there is a dispute between the two, federal law takes precedence. This means that whenever a state law conflicts with a federal statute, the state law must give way to the federal law, whether or not the state agrees with it.
In general, federal law is applicable to all states and serves as the legal framework for the entire country, providing consistency and uniformity across the nation.
For such more question on federal statute:
https://brainly.com/question/30515263
#SPJ4
The following question ay be like this:
A federal statute applies only to those states that agree to apply it within their borders.
True/False?
The United States is on par with Russia in having more persons per capita in prison. Is that a sign that the United States is a nation that enforces its laws, or is it an
indication that something is inherently wrong with its criminal justice system? Please explain and then respond to a
Answers
According to the criminal justice system, the United States is the one that enforces the laws, and the poor are disproportionately represented in the prison population.
What is criminal?
The person who committed a crime is referred to as a "criminal." A individual is legitimately arrested if they are the indifferent perpetrator of the crime. Lawbreakers are classified into four types: persistent, moralistic, juridical, and organized. The perpetrator must be punished by the court.
According to the criminal justice, the United States is the one that writes the laws, and the crimes police are overburdened. A substantial proportion of the poor end up in prison.
Hence, the significance was the criminal aforementioned.
Learn more about on criminal, here:
https://brainly.com/question/23059652
#SPJ1
How does this help you understand the hierarchy of the courts and what you can do as a citizen on trial?
Answers
It is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.
Understanding the hierarchy of the courts is essential for citizens involved in the legal system, as it helps navigate the judicial process and know the appropriate steps to take when on trial. Here's how the court hierarchy works and what citizens can do when facing a trial:
1. Court Hierarchy:
- Trial Courts: At the base of the hierarchy are trial courts, where legal proceedings begin. These courts handle cases at the initial level, where evidence is presented, and decisions are made based on the facts of the case and applicable laws.
- Appellate Courts: Above trial courts are appellate courts, which review decisions made by the trial courts. Appellate courts assess whether errors of law occurred during the trial or if there were procedural irregularities. They do not re-evaluate the facts or conduct new trials. Instead, they focus on matters of law and ensure proper application of legal principles.
- Supreme Court (or Highest Court): At the top of the hierarchy is the highest court in the jurisdiction, often known as the Supreme Court or Court of Appeals (depending on the country). The highest court generally reviews cases that involve significant legal issues or conflicts in interpretation of the law. Its decisions set precedents and have a binding effect on lower courts.
2. As a Citizen on Trial:
- Know Your Rights: As a citizen on trial, it is crucial to understand your rights. This includes the right to legal representation, the right to remain silent, the right to a fair trial, and the right to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses.
- Seek Legal Counsel: It is advisable to seek legal counsel to guide you through the legal process, ensure your rights are protected, and provide expertise in building your defense.
- Present Your Case: During trial proceedings, you can present evidence, call witnesses, and testify in your defense. Your legal counsel will help you navigate the process and present your case effectively.
- Appeal if Necessary: If dissatisfied with the outcome of the trial, you may have the right to appeal the decision. Contract with your attorney to determine if there are grounds for an appeal based on errors of law or procedural irregularities.
It is important to note that specific legal procedures and rights may vary depending on the jurisdiction and legal system in which the trial takes place.
Therefore, it is crucial to consult with legal professionals who have expertise in the relevant jurisdiction to understand the specific rights and steps available to citizens on trial.
learn more about contract here: brainly.com/question/32254040
#SPJ11
Discuss organ of states and examples
Answers
Answer:
The term “organs of state” is used to refer to a range of institutions, including national and provincial government departments, municipalities and their business agencies. “That would be a time-consuming and an almost impossible task, even for an office as well-resourced as mine”, he said.
the powers of the united states congress are outlined in which constitutional article?
Answers
The powers of the united states congress are outlined in the article I, section B, clause 18.
According to the Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, the Congress shall have Power to make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States or in any Department or Officer thereof. It is known as the Necessary and Proper Clause which gives Congress the authority to create any laws that are necessary and proper to carry out the enumerated powers of the Constitution. The Necessary and Proper clause of it has been up for interpretation since the writing of the Constitution. According to the clause 18, everyone has the right to freedom of association.
To learn more about Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
https://brainly.com/question/17256238
#SPJ4
Which of the following statements is true about foster homes?
A.The effectiveness of many foster home placements is inhibited by problems such as frequent movement of youths from home to home.
B.Unlike group homes, foster homes are closed, secure, community-based facilities excluded from both halfway-in and halfway-out programs.
C. Although foster homes are rarely used by juvenile courts in any jurisdiction, there are many sound evaluations of their effectiveness.
D. Foster homes are somewhat larger and frequently less family-like than group homes
Answers
The statement which is true about foster homes is Unlike group homes, foster homes are closed, secure, community-based facilities excluded from both halfway-in and halfway-out programs. Thus, option B is correct.
What is Foster homes?Foster homes are a home where an orphaned, neglected, or delinquent youngster is cared for. Prior to 1945, "fostering" refers to a variety of situations in which children were cared for in households other than their own. The concept was intended to contrast institutional care with family placements.
Foster homes give children who have been abused, neglected, or abandoned with protection, stability, and refuge. Fostering is a temporary care arrangement, with the ultimate objective of reuniting foster children with their natural relatives after they have been judged as capable of caring for them. Hence, option B is correct.
Learn more about Foster homes here:
https://brainly.com/question/29603747
#SPJ1
Tort suits generally come from:a. customer carelessness or ignoranceb. unexpected instances of carelessness or bad behavior c. failure to plan for unexpected catastrophesd. natural disasterse. repeated failure to comply with industry regulations
Answers
Tort suits generally come from unexpected instances of carelessness or bad behavior. option (b)
A tort is a civil wrong that causes harm or injury to another person or property. Tort suits can arise from a wide range of circumstances, including accidents, intentional wrongdoing, and negligence. Negligence is the most common basis for tort claims and arises when a person or entity fails to exercise reasonable care, causing harm to another person.
Tort claims can also be based on intentional conduct, such as assault or battery, defamation, or false imprisonment. While failure to comply with industry regulations or planning for unexpected catastrophes may contribute to tort claims, the primary source of such claims is unexpected instances of carelessness or bad behavior.
Learn more about Tort suits
https://brainly.com/question/29890817
#SPJ4
12 angry men viewing guide 2. several jurors give reasons why they are voting guilty. list 3 jurors and the explanation for each of their votes
Answers
Juror 3: Juror 3 votes guilty due to his personal biases and emotions. He has a strained relationship with his son,
leading him to see the accused as a troubled youth who is guilty of the crime. Juror 3's belief in the accused's guilt is based on his own personal experiences rather than the evidence presented in the case.
His emotions cloud his judgment, making it challenging for him to evaluate the case objectively. It is crucial to challenge his preconceptions and encourage him to separate his personal biases from the facts of the case.
By highlighting the flaws in his arguments and encouraging him to consider alternative perspectives, it may be possible to shift his stance and help him make a more informed decision.
Juror 10: Juror 10's vote is rooted in racism and prejudice. He holds strong views on people from the accused's background being prone to criminal behavior, which drives his belief in the accused's guilt.
Juror 10's vote is a prime example of how personal biases can undermine the integrity of the justice system. It is essential to challenge his discriminatory beliefs and encourage him to evaluate the evidence impartially.
By emphasizing the importance of fairness and equality, it may be possible to shift his perspective and help him recognize the flaws in his reasoning.
Juror 7: Juror 7 votes guilty due to his lack of interest and indifference towards the case. He is primarily concerned with attending a baseball game and wants to wrap up the deliberation quickly.
Juror 7's indifference undermines the integrity of the justice system, and it is important to engage him in the discussion and encourage him to take the case seriously.
By highlighting the importance of his role as a juror and the potential consequences of a hasty decision, it may be possible to shift his focus from personal interests to the pursuit of justice.
It is crucial to ensure that every juror understands the significance of their role and is committed to fulfilling their duties with the utmost seriousness and impartiality.
To know more about evidence click here
brainly.com/question/14584633
#SPJ11
Which action is part of the naturalization process?
O A. Buying property in the United States
O B. Getting accepted to college
C. Serving in the U.S. military
O D. Passing a background check
Answers
Answer: b
Explanation: i pick b because accepted to college is better
___________ pertains to the responsibilities supervisors have to oversee the actions of their supervisees.a. Breach of confidentialityb. Breach of informed consentc. Direct liabilityd. Vicarious liability
Answers
Direct liability pertains to the responsibilities supervisors have to oversee the actions of their supervisees. Direct liability refers to the legal responsibility that a supervisor or manager may have for the actions of their subordinates, particularly in cases where those actions lead to harm or injury to others.
Under direct liability, a supervisor or manager can be held responsible for their own actions, as well as the actions of their subordinates. This means that if a supervisor fails to properly oversee the actions of their supervisees or fails to take appropriate action when they become aware of wrongdoing, they may be held legally responsible for any harm that results.
Learn more about responsibilities supervisors
https://brainly.com/question/30509694
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an unbudgetable spending shock?
Property tax bill
Semi-annual dental visit
Gas used on a planned road trip
Parking Ticket
If you use your Rainy Day fund to pay for a shock, how should you replenish the account?
As a part of your normal savings each month, use part fo refill the fund
With small regular payments as part of your budget moving forward
In as large of payments you can make each month until the account is refilled
Using your emergency credit card as a cash advance
How can you avoid Budgetable spending shocks?
By updating your spending plan or budget regularly
By keeping a Rainy Day fund
By keeping an Emergency Credit Card
Spending shocks cannot be avoided
Answers
Answer:
1)D 2)C 3)A
Explanation:
i took the test
A goal of the forensic investigator is to secure and document the crime scene while minimizing changes to crime scene evidence. True or false?.
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation: Brainliest
A goal of the forensic investigator is to secure and document the crime scene while minimizing changes to crime scene evidence is a true statement.
What is an investigation?The investigation is the initial data collection that occurs after conducting some research. Scientific research or any other information or data may be involved in the investigation.
To make a point and establish a fact, the data must be carefully examined. The person who does the investigation is called an investigator.
Preserving and recording the murder investigation while minimizing alterations to the crime scene investigation is one of the professional investigator's objectives. In this manner, the crime scene will be protected and there will be no misinterpretation of misleading done.
Learn more about investigation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28499710
#SPJ2
juvenile court, probate court, and traffic court are examples of ________.
Answers
Juvenile court, probate court, and traffic court are examples of limited jurisdiction courts.
These courts are set up to deal with particular cases within their respective fields of expertise. Cases involving minors accused of committing crimes or in need of protection and guidance are heard in juvenile court. It emphasizes the welfare and rehabilitation of young offenders.
Wills, estates, guardianships, and trust related issues are handled in probate court. It supervises the division of property, the payment of debts and the selection of guardians for minors or disabled people.
Infractions of traffic laws and regulations are dealt with in traffic court. It makes decisions in cases involving traffic infractions like reckless driving, parking in the wrong place and speeding. According to the types of cases they handle each of these courts operates within a set of rules and regulations.
Learn more about Juvenile court at:
brainly.com/question/15179832
#SPJ4
Question #4
Multiple Choice
plaintiff, he or she must be in the "zone of danger" where injury
To determine if someone is
could occur.
a worried
an injured
a foreseeable
an irresponsible
Answers
Explanation: An injured
I don't know if this is right, but I tried.
Solutions to counteract poor service delivery
Answers
Poor service delivery can be a serious problem for businesses. There are several results that can help offset this issue.
The first step is to identify the root causes of poor service delivery, which could include shy training, understaffing, or ineffective processes. Once the issues have been linked, businesses can work to address them by investing in comprehensive staff training retaining fresh personnel where necessary, and enforcing process advancements to increase effectiveness.
Collecting feedback from clients, regularly reviewing service delivery criteria , and enforcing nonstop enhancement action can also help to enhance service delivery over time. A client centric culture should be established where customer satisfaction is the top priority.
To learn more about Service Delivery:
https://brainly.com/question/27475639
#SPJ1
The correct question is:
What are the possible solutions to counteract poor service delivery?
Explain any TWO (2) principles of bureaucracy
according to Max Weber.
Answers
Answer:
Max Weber bureaucratic theory
Max Weber, a German scientist, defines bureaucracy as a highly structured, formalized, and also an impersonal organization. He also instituted the belief that an organization must have a defined hierarchical structure and clear rules, regulations, and lines of authority which
Explanation:
Max Weber bureaucratic theory
Max Weber, a German scientist, defines bureaucracy as a highly structured, formalized, and also an impersonal organization. He also instituted the belief that an organization must have a defined hierarchical structure and clear rules, regulations, and lines of authority which
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally
Answers
The set of laws allowing you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is commonly known as tort law.
Tort law is a branch of law that handles wrongful actions and their consequences. In this situation, the broken window of your home caused by someone else is classified as negligence. Negligence refers to a breach of duty to take reasonable care that causes harm or loss to another person. The person who broke the window of your home was not careful enough to prevent such damage, and as a result, you experienced financial harm or loss due to the cost of repair or replacement of the window.
Therefore, you are entitled to seek financial compensation or restitution from the person who broke the window. In order to claim financial restitution, you must prove that the person who broke your window was negligent, that you experienced harm or loss, and that the harm or loss was a direct result of the other person's negligence. If you can prove all of these elements, then you have a strong case for financial restitution.
In the event that the person who broke your window refuses to pay for the damages or is unable to do so, you can take them to court, where a judge or jury will evaluate the evidence and determine whether you are entitled to financial restitution. In conclusion, the set of laws that allows you to seek financial restitution from a person who broke the window of your home accidentally is governed by tort law, specifically the principles of negligence.
Know more about Tort law here:
https://brainly.com/question/33013975
#SPJ8
questions for muslium.....
Answers
Answer:
Hadith is a form of Islamic tradition recorded in oral sources. A hadith is usually a short and out of context account of what Muhammad said or did. Usually its purpose was to confirm something in accordance with the law of God. Together, the hadiths form the sunnah, the most important source of Muslim morality and law after the Qur'an. Initially, they were passed on orally through the chain of messengers. According to the traditional view of Muslim scholars, this contributed to the creation of many false hadiths, which were to support the interests of individual groups, and by about 200 years after the prophet's death, there were already around 200,000 Arab scholars therefore proceeded to a careful study of these messages, checking the chain of transmitters of each hadith. On the basis of this research, they created collections of hadiths believed to be authentic.