Terry was named in his parents’ will as the trustee of the family farm. He does not want the position as he has no interest in farming. His brother, Harold, has worked the farm for the last five years and would be a far better trustee. His parents chose Terry, however, because he was older. What can Terry do in this situation?
Terry can resign as the trustee and nominate Harold to take his place. He can do this by submitting a written resignation to the probate court.
What is probate court?
Probate court is a court of law that handles matters related to the estate of a deceased person. Probate court oversees the distribution of a person's assets, including real estate, investments, and other property. The court also determines the validity of any wills and trusts left by the deceased and appoints guardians for any minor children. The court also investigates any disputes over the estate, such as disagreements among heirs or creditors. The court also ensures that all taxes and debts of the deceased are paid before any assets are distributed.
The court will then consider whether Harold is qualified to serve as trustee, and if so, they will likely approve the nomination. This will allow Harold to take on the responsibility of being the trustee of the family farm.
To learn more about probate court
https://brainly.com/question/15055462
#SPJ1
What does it mean when a state government passes a law that forbids texting while operating a vehicle
Answer:
It's employing concourent power according to the numbers they collect of how many people text and drive, and how many people get into accidents because of texting and driving.
Explanation:
The punitive conditions are used only for the most severe crimes and usually result in incarceration.
True or False
Domestic violence may increase the likelihood of homelessness for all of the following reasons, EXCEPT
O A
OB.
O C
O D.
the danger forces people to leave their current home.
the victims often cannot afford separate housing.
the shelters designated for victims are often full.
the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
The correct answer is option (d) the abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction.
Domestic violence is a complex issue that can significantly increase the likelihood of homelessness for its victims. Here are the explanations for the other three options:
a. The danger forces people to leave their current home: Domestic violence often involves physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, creating an unsafe environment for the victims. To protect themselves and their children, victims may be forced to flee their homes and seek safety elsewhere, sometimes without adequate resources or support networks.
b. The victims often cannot afford separate housing: Many victims of domestic violence face financial limitations, as their abusers may exert control over financial resources or prevent them from working. This financial dependency makes it challenging for victims to secure separate housing and maintain their independence.
c. The shelters designated for victims are often full: Domestic violence shelters provide temporary refuge for victims seeking safety and support. Unfortunately, due to the prevalence of domestic violence, these shelters often operate at full capacity, leaving many victims without immediate access to a safe place to stay.
d. The abusers often have a drug or alcohol addiction: This statement does not directly contribute to an increased likelihood of homelessness for victims of domestic violence. While substance abuse can be a factor in some cases of domestic violence, it does not directly impact the likelihood of homelessness for the victims themselves.
It is important to recognize the complexities of domestic violence and its impact on homelessness. By understanding the reasons behind homelessness resulting from domestic violence, we can work towards developing comprehensive support systems and interventions to help victims rebuild their lives and secure safe and stable housing. Therefore the correct option is D
Know more about Domestic violence here:
https://brainly.com/question/31836260
#SPJ8
OK so I wrote a question that I put an answer to because I had found out the correct answers for the question. I felt like it would be nice if there wasn't any guessing for that question because if you try to find the answer for the question they were all wrong. Then someone named "Supernova" reported my question/answer for putting the answer in the question because somehow that's WRONG. So am I wrong for wanting people to know the right answer to the question?
Answer:
no you're not in the wrong
why do people get epilepsy and how can it be treated
Answer:
Anyone can develop epilepsy. Epilepsy affects both males and females of all races, ethnic backgrounds and ages. Brain conditions such as brain tumors can cause it. Strokes are also the leading cause of epilepsy. Infectious diseases like meningitis can also cause epilepsy.
Explanation:
Treatment usually involves anti epileptic medications or sometimes surgery can control seizures for the majority of people with epilepsy. Other treatments like devices and changes in diet are used. Some people require lifelong treatment to control seizures, but for others, the seizures eventually go away. Some children with epilepsy may outgrow the condition with age. As of now there is no cure for epilepsy.
Which court process describes when a juvenile case goes to trial, where both attorneys present evidence, questions witnesses and discuss the case?
Adjudicatory hearing
Intake review
Arraignment
Disposition hearing
Answer:
Adjudicatory hearing
Explanation:
An adjudicatory hearing is the juvenile court's version of a trial. In an adjudicatory hearing, both parties present information so that the judge may examine the case.
This is where a bill goes to reconcile differences between the house and the senate
Answer:
conference committee - A temporary, ad hoc panel composed of House and Senate conferees which is formed for the purpose of reconciling differences in legislation that has passed both chambers. Conference committees are usually convened to resolve bicameral differences on major and controversial legislation.
Explanation:
Critically Analyse the Implications of lack of access to the media
Media are the communication channels or instruments used in mass communication to transmit and store information or data. The phrase applies to areas of the mass media communications sector such as print media, publishing, news media, photography, film, broadcasting, digital media, and advertising.
The communication channels via which we spread news, music, films, education, promotional messages, and other data are referred to as media, which is the plural of the word medium. It comprises print and digital newspapers, magazines, billboards, radio, television, the Internet, fax machines, and telephone.
Information is communicated through media, a communication instrument. The three media are typically referred to as news media, social media, and web media, although you may also hear the terms earned media, shared media, and web media.
Learn more about the Media here:
https://brainly.com/question/7887964
#SPJ1
What is the job of law enforcement when arriving at the crime scene?
Answer:
to look after the scene and collect uncompromised evidence.
Answer:
Hey mate.....
Explanation:
This is ur answer.....
Police Identification and Records Officers collect and preserve evidence found at crime scenes, such as hairs, fibers, or shoe impressions. They photograph crime or accident scenes for evidence records. They dust selected areas of a crime scene and lift latent fingerprints.
Hope it helps!
Brainliest plz....
Follow me! :)
3. Many countries do different things in their elections. For example in Australia, you can be fined if you don't vote. In France, there is a news blackout for the 48 hours prior to election day...there can be no appearances by the candidates and nothing can be said on TV or in newspapers about the election...except to say that it is being held. In England and Canada, elections are done very quickly...none of this two years of running for office that we see in American elections. In what ways would you change the election processes in the United States? In what ways are you ok with what we have? List or describe three thoughts
Here are three thoughts on potential changes and areas of satisfaction:
Potential Changes:
Election Duration: Some people might suggest shortening the duration of election campaigns in the United States, as they can be lengthy and costly. Reducing the campaign period could potentially reduce expenses and the influence of money in politics.
Voting Obligation: Some individuals may propose implementing a compulsory voting system, similar to what exists in Australia. The idea is that making voting mandatory could increase voter turnout and promote civic engagement.
Election Communication Regulations: There could be discussions around implementing stricter regulations on election-related communications, similar to the news blackout in France. Limiting campaign advertising or certain types of messaging in the days leading up to the election might aim to reduce potential biases or misinformation.
Areas of Satisfaction:
Freedom of Speech: The United States' strong protection of freedom of speech allows for a wide range of political discourse and expression during election campaigns. This allows candidates and citizens to voice their opinions, engage in debates, and freely express their political views.
Election Accessibility: The United States has made efforts to enhance voting accessibility, such as through early voting options, mail-in voting, and accommodations for individuals with disabilities. These measures aim to ensure that citizens can exercise their right to vote conveniently and inclusively.
Democratic Processes: The U.S. electoral system, with its separation of powers, checks and balances, and regular elections, is designed to uphold democratic principles. Many appreciate the democratic foundations and institutions that facilitate the peaceful transition of power and provide opportunities for citizen participation.
prior to entering an enter section a driver should cheak the
Answer:
lights engine tire
Explanation:
Is a non judicial settlement of a case in which the defendant exchanges a guilty plea for judicial concessions and reduced sentences
Answer:
Plea bargaining
Explanation:
Plea bargaining is described as the kind of non-judicial settlement as regards a case. In such a settlement the defendant or the accused reciprocates a guilty plea in return for judicial compromise and reduction in the period of sentences. It is type of negotiation between the defense and prosecution with an aim to settle a criminal case out of court i.e. without involving the judiciary. The defedents expect a judicial leniency in punishment or severity of charges filed in return for the guilty plead by the accused in such agreements. Thus, 'plea bargaining' is the correct answer.
Drag each tile to the correct box to complete the sequence.
Drag the steps of the policy-making process so that they are in the correct order.
issue identification
and agenda setting
policy formulation
policy adoption
policy implementation
and evaluation
Į
The correct order of these steps in the policy-making process is correct. 1.- issue recognizable proof and plan setting. 2. the creation of policies. 3. Policy implementation . 4. the evaluation and implementation of the policy.
What is the adopted policy?The public policy process that follows policy formulation defines policy adoption. The selection of alternative policies includes policy adoption.
The following actions are examples of how this can be applied.
To begin, the government includes a problem or issue that must be resolved among the considerations it must make.
The government then begins to prioritize in order to select the type of policy with the best chance of success in addressing the problem. At that point, the specialists develop and implement the particular policy. Finally, in order to make a decision, government officials must monitor and assess the policy's effectiveness: to carry it out, change it, or make big changes.
To learn more about policy-making visit :
https://brainly.com/question/24249658
#SPJ1
phyllis has worked as a mechanic for boeing corporation for the last ten years. phyllis recently found out she is pregnant, so she requests a transfer to another position that does not require as much lifting. boeing refuses to transfer phyllis and fires her instead. phyllis files a complaint with the eeoc for a violation of the pregnancy discrimination act, and that agency, the eeoc, decides the case in boeing’s favor. after exhausting all administrative remedies, phyllis files a lawsuit in federal court, which will:
Phyllis files a case in federal court after exhausting all administrative options, and the court will respect the agency's judgment on both legal and factual issues by upholding it unless it is clearly arbitrary.
What two legal standards do courts employ to evaluate judgments made by agencies?Arbitrariness-or-capriciousness and substantial evidence are the two standards of review that the APA established for courts evaluating the conduct of administrative agencies.
When does a court examine an administrative agency's decision?The process through which courts assess the decisions made by the three branches of the government—the legislative, executive, and administrative branches—is known as judicial review. It also establishes if such activities are compliant with the nation's constitution.
What impact does the Pregnancy Discrimination Act have on businesses?In all areas of employment, including hiring, firing, promotion, compensation, and other employment perks, the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) forbids discrimination on the basis of pregnancy. Policies that restrict or forbid women from working just because they are expecting or of childbearing age are forbidden under this law.
Learn more about Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA): https://brainly.com/question/10692857
#SPJ4
A man left his wife when he found out she had cancer and just assumed she had died, so he married another without getting a divorce. Years later, he discovers his wife was alive all this time.
IS HE GUILTY OF BIGAMY? BIGAMY IS THE ACT OR CONDITION OF ANY PERSON MARRYING YET ANOTHER PERSON WHILE STILL BEING LAWFULLY MARRIED.
Answer:
No. He didn’t know that his other wife was alive so it’s not his fault unless he knew his wife was dead. I hope this helped.
Explanation:
There was a thunderstorm in your area and the power went out. The traffic lights are not functioning. What is the first thing the law requires you to do when you arrive at an intersection?
Answer:
You stop and look at any possible direction a car could come from then go where you want to go don't forget to report it.
Explanation:
Conduct an online search for organizations that fall into each of the four categories presented in the lecture: Cooperative, Pressure, Profit,
and Service. Post the name of THREE organizations for each of the identified types of organizations. Do not duplicate an organization
someone else has listed...SO THE EARLY BIRD GETS THE WORM!!! Make a comment about whether or not you agree with the way your
classmates categorized the organizations. Also comment on why some types of organizations fall into more than one category
What is an organization?
An organization can be described as an organized group of people which has a a particular purpose , they may be for business purpose as well as the government department.
These organizations could be Cooperative, Pressure, Profit, and Service.
Examples of profit organizations are:
Airlines construction companies freight hauling companies publishing companies restaurants retail storesExamples of service organizations are:
Benefits plans payroll processors insurance medical claims processors trust companieshosted data centersLearn more about organizations on:
https://brainly.com/question/17320867
#SPJ1
Under which exception can a police officer legally enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant?
A. The police believe the person has committed a crime based on eyewitness testimony.
B. The evidence is in plain sight and the officer has a legitimate reason for finding the evidence.
C. The police officer believes that the person in the home is harboring a fugitive.
D. The person who owns the home has already been arrested by the police.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
since the answer is in plain sight he has an actual reason to go in because he's almost definetely finding an evidence
why would a select committee need to focus on a particular issue
A select committee is a sort of committee in a legislative body established for a particular reason or problem, as opposed to a standing committee that includes a wide variety of subjects. When there is a need for in-depth study or examination of a specific problem that is not addressed by established groups, a special committee is often formed. Here are some of the reasons why a select group might be required to concentrate on a specific issue:
Select committees are frequently formed when there is a need for in-depth study or examination of a complicated or specialized problem that necessitates skill or knowledge beyond what is accessible in the current groups.
Urgency or time-sensitive matters: Select groups can be established to handle urgent or time-sensitive problems that require instant attention, such as a crisis or emergency scenario.
Select panels can be used to handle nonpartisan problems such as national security, foreign policy, or economic issues that may necessitate teamwork and coordination between members of different parties.
Select panels can be used to examine or supervise government organizations or officials, as well as hold them responsible for their actions or decisions.
Public input and involvement: Through hearings, public statements, and other forms of interaction, select committees can provide opportunities for public input and participation on a specific topic.
Overall, select committees can be an effective instrument for governmental organizations to handle particular problems that require close scrutiny and expertise, and can help to ensure that important issues are addressed effectively and efficiently.
May the prosecution/defense accuse to a witness from the same team?
For example, if I am a lawyer from the defense, but, to declare the defendant guitless I need to blame a witness from the defense.
What should I do? Look for another witness from the other team or use the perfect witness from my own team.
Please answer with US system, it's for a mock trial
For the defense of the defendant, I will choose for another witness from the same team.
What is defense?A defense is supporting or defending someone in an argument when he has been criticized.
After choosing the another witness from the another team, as a lawyer I will make try to make him puzzled by asking the complex questions again and again. So that he will not be able to respond in a proper manner.
I will also make sure that the statement of this witness varies with the statement of another important witness of the same team. Giving contradictory statements by the witnesses of the same team makes no important conclusion in accusing my defendant.
Learn more about defense here:
https://brainly.com/question/16223801
#SPJ1
Investigating careers
which of the following allows the person to have a normal job while also serving in the armed forces?
A. National Guard
B. Navy
C. Air Force
D. Coast Guard
The National Guard allows individuals to have a normal job while serving in the armed forces (option a).
1. The National Guard is the option that allows individuals to have a normal job while serving in the armed forces.
2. The Navy, Air Force, and Coast Guard are branches of the military that require full-time commitment without the possibility of a civilian job.
3. However, the National Guard is a unique reserve component of the United States Armed Forces that operates in both a federal and state capacity.
4. National Guard members typically serve part-time, usually one weekend per month and two weeks during the summer, allowing them to maintain civilian employment.
5. In times of need, such as during a natural disaster or in times of war, National Guard members can be called upon to serve on active duty.
6. While on active duty, National Guard members receive the same benefits and responsibilities as full-time active-duty personnel.
7. Once the active duty period is over, National Guard members return to their civilian jobs and continue with their normal lives.
8. This unique arrangement provides individuals the opportunity to serve their country while also pursuing a civilian career.
For more such questions on armed forces, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/14542723
#SPJ8
Examine the following diagram:
Federalists
Wanted a strong
central government
to share power
with the states
Supported
ratification
Anti-Federalists
?
Opposed
ratification
Diagram copyright Discovery Education
Which phrase completes the diagram?
Worried about abuses of individual rights
Objected to separation of powers
Opposed the institution of slavery
Wanted a more unified national system
Answer:
wanted a more unified national system
Audrey is showing a customer a beautiful diamond ring at her calorie suddenly two mast man come in smashing display case and growing the jewelry Audrey puts her hand on the phone to call the police and one of them and shoots her Audreys rest of the hospital but does not survive in the middle captured by the police what crime would be most likely be charged with in addition to murder
- institutional robbery
- first-degree armed robbery
- second-degree armed robbery
- third-degree armed robbery
In addition to the murder charges, the robbers, who attacked Audrey, would be charged with the crime of A. institutional robbery.
What is institutional robbery?Institutional robbery refers to a robbery occurring in a commercial setting.
Institutional robbery involves "taking or attempting to take valuable items from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force or threat of force or violence."
Thus, the two robbers would not be charged with first-degree, second-degree, or third-degree armed robbery but murder and institutional robbery.
Learn more about the robbery at https://brainly.com/question/16032473
Answer:
First degree armed robbery
Explanation:
took test
The work of private security personnel is analogous to law enforcement officers, which means: the work of both is exactly the same, the work of both is similar but the levels of legal authority are different and unequal, the work of law enforcement is more important for people's safety from cyber attacks, in essence the work of the police is much different than that of security guards
Answer:
The work of both is similar but the levels of legal authority are different and unequal
Explanation:
Took the quiz on edge
How can consumers use consumer protection laws to protect themselves in the marketplace?
Why did the police officer kill George Floyd?
Answer:
Police Brutality
Explanation:
The police officer applied a knee to Mr.Floyds neck to pin him down and refused to get up or get the knee of him even tho the man couldn't breathe and later died from lack of oxygen.
Answer:
He apparently used a fake $20 bill and the police officer used to much force to hol a already down person.
Explanation:
The form used by employers to determine how much of your paycheck to
withhold is a
O A. W-4
O B. W-2
O C. 1099
O D. 1040
The form used by employers to determine how much of your paycheck to withhold is the W-4. Hence, option A is appropriate.
What is the meaning of Employers?According to the provisions of their employment contract, the employer pays an employee's salary. Benefits for employees are a responsibility of the business as well. Depending on regional legislation or labor union contracts, these could include insurance, gratuities, and retirement benefits. An employee works for a business, group, or individual.
More specifically, an employer is an organization, institution, government entity, agency, company, professional services firm, nonprofit association, small business, store, or individual who employs or puts to work others who may be called employees or staff members.
Any person in charge of managing, supervising, or controlling a workplace is an employer. An employer is a legal person or organization that controls an employee under an express or implied contract.
Hence, option A is correct.
Learn more about Employer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29603057
#SPJ5
Which of the following is NOT one of the punishments for speeding?
Answer:
Explanation:
Every human is bound by the rules of society. We are expected to follow the rules, be it family, school, college, office, etc. On an individual level, rules help us in conducting our lives in a meaningful way. They put limits on our actions. Rules guide our behavior and actions. On a societal level, rules facilitate the better organization of every stakeholder. Rules are like codes of conduct for society. They promote harmony, cooperation, equality, etc. No society can sustain without rules. Hence, ensuring that rules are properly followed is important. Punishment is one of the means to achieve the goal of a rules led society. Punishment acts as a deterrence against violation of rules. For example, fines are imposed on people violating traffic rules. The imposition of fines is a tool of punishment and it motivates the public in obeying traffic rules. Obeying rules led to discipline in one's life. They guide every action and avoid dilemmas. In a work, coordination is very crucial and having specific guidelines promotes coordination. A proper rule based work culture diminishes chaos, encourages discipline, and boosts efficiency.
what's your favorite billie eilish song ? mine is no time to die for now.
Answer:
probably the classic, ocean eyes :)
Explanation:i like my future but also no because i dont wanna seem like that girl who only knows her new songs so ig sHEs brOKen?