why do people ask me if this is a dating app!!!!!!!

The magical element that was involved in the healing of the leper is this:

C. His sores sprouting sunflowers

The magical element in these two poems was the sprouting sunflowers in the face of the man which worked well in healing the leper. Magical realism is a genre of writing where elements of magic or the spiritual world are incorporated into real life.

In the real world, it is quite unusual to expect sprouting flowers from a person's face to be a source of healing but this was the exact depiction in the text.

Learn more about magical realism here:

https://brainly.com/question/840830

#SPJ1

Answer: This is a long read haha

Anyways,

Explanation: During the British occupation of India, they exerted colonial monopolies and control against

the Indian people. The Indians rebelled against these monopolies, similar to the American revolution

against the British. However, the movement in India was largely driven by nonviolent acts of civil

disobedience, led by Mahatma Gandhi. Throughout his letter, Gandhi applies a conciliatory, yet forceful

tone, he places the blame onto the British, and he continually repeats his plan for the march in order to

convince the British to reverse their policies before he acts.

Throughout his letter, Gandhi is conciliatory and respectful. He writes to the British with the

intent of asking for the reversal of a law, so he knows that he must be polite and courteous. His

demeanor conveys to the British his sense of servitude to the British in lines 16-20. However, he is not

stepping down, but rather standing up to the British respectfully. He states that he “does not seek to

harm your people,” which simultaneously reassures the British of nonviolence but also conveys Gandhi’s

sense of urgency. He is going to act, he is going to do something, and he is informing the British of it.

Gandhi is not submitting; he is asserting himself, but with respect. Through his letter, he uses imperative

verbs, but states them politely so to not convey a violent tone. He says, “I invite you,” which sounds

polite, but indirectly is an order to the British to reverse their ways. He finishes his letter by reminding

the British that he is not threatening them, but merely reminding them that he will act if they do not.

Through the letter, his tone is both respectful to the British but is also clear and forceful in its message.

Gandhi’s rhetorical tactics place the blame onto the British. When he continually reassures

them of his nonviolence, he is demonstrating that the Indians are not going to act violently, thereby

indirectly asking the British if they too will follow the Indians. He uses phrases such as “unless the British

nation…retraces its steps” and “if the British commerce with India is purified of greed.” These

statements are Gandhi’s way of placing responsibility on to the British. They evoke the sense that the

violence and conflict are the British’s fault not the Indians. In this way, Gandhi leaves it to the British to

decide whether they want to stop their actions, thereby evoking a sense of guilt and responsibility in the

British. These methods serve Gandhi’s purpose of asking the British to revise their laws without

outrightly asking. His methods make the British the aggressors and, in this way, makes the British

consider their position more fully.

By repeating his plans to march, Gandhi is showing the British that he will not make any

surprises. He, from the start of the passage, informs the British of his nonviolent plans. By ensuring that

the British know of his plans, he is showing a sense of responsibility and honesty in his actions. This

causes the British to regard him more favorably, because they recognize that his actions and motives are

clear and honest. This will serve to make them more receptive to his demands. Gandhi also describes

the situation in such a way to make the British pity the Indians. He calls the tax the “most iniquitous

from a poor man’s standpoint,” and he wonders how they “have submitted to the cruel monopoly for so

long.” By describing the situation in such terms, he gives reason for the British to pity the Indians, and

again to see the harm they have caused them. These all serve to further Gandhi’s case.

Throughout his letter to the British, Gandhi evokes a sense of imperative, yet polite force,

evokes a sense of guilt in the British, and clearly states his demands. He is trying to ask the British to revise their salt act before he marches, so throughout his letter, he implores the British to consider his

demands, yet still presents himself respectably and worthy of consideration. Although the letter did not

work, retrospectively this letter shows the fault of the British to not accept Gandhi and furthers Gandhi’s

legacy as the nonviolent aggressor. This causes the British to be more respectful of Gandhi, for respect

will be met with respect. Gandhi is now in a position to gain the British’s favor, and now they will be more likely to accept him.

Answer:

1.05882352941

Explanation:

The importance of the age difference between the two characters in the chaser by john collier is it represents different sides of two personalities as confident and nervous

The play chaser by john collier highlights the desire for the love of the young man for which he is looking for a magic charm in order to please the lady he loves in his dreams.

The reality that the elderly man appears to have a great deal of business expertise gives him an identity appearance. The old guy might be seen as an intelligent character who is an expert in his field.

The opposite character Alan Austen is shown as a frightened, passionate, and inexperienced young man who is battling for his lady love and is fervently trying to win her attention.

Learn more about the chaser, here:

brainly.com/question/4699771

#SPJ1

Answer:

a.simple sentence.

Explanation:

i don't know why tho

Both recognize the threat of the enemy but emphasize America's power to defeat it.

Roosevelt's infamy speech:

It was given just one day after the infamous attack by the Japanese military on Pearl Harbor. In this speech to Congress, Roosevelt discusses how this was a cowardly attack that negatively affected America. However, he goes on to discuss that America will experience a triumph no matter what it takes.

George W. Bush has a similar message after the terrorist attacks on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001. Bush express the sadness that occurs with this event but also discusses how America will defeat the individuals responsible for this disastorous event.

Learn more about Roosevelt's infamy speech on:

https://brainly.com/question/3687294

#SPJ4

Answer:

Both recognize the threat of the enemy but emphasize America's power to defeat it.

Explanation:

its right

Answer:

In order to write a good claim statement, I'd choose all of the above.

Explanation:

:)

Answer:

If you are once unable to achieve success analyse your performance and better next time.

I think time would be fit in this sentence

hope it is correct ,(ﾉ◕ヮ◕)ﾉ*.✧

Answer:

If you are once unable to achieve success analyse your performance and better next

time.

I think that time can be a correct word for this sentence.

Answer:

Shared characteristics always exist in the common ancestor and in the modern organism.

The more characteristics organisms share, the more closely related they are.

Explanation:

They're passed down from an ancestor, and if they have more it must mean they had more in common with them, and they are closer related.

(also i do edge2020)

Answer a and c

Explanation: 100% on edg

The vertical component of the pebble's initial velocity needs to be 9.6 m/s in order to hit the window.

To determine the vertical component of the pebble's initial velocity, we can use the equation of motion:

d = v0 * t + (1/2) * g * t^2

where d is the vertical displacement (4.1 m), v0 is the initial vertical velocity, t is the time of flight, and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s^2).

Since the horizontal component of velocity is given as 2.0 m/s, we can find the time of flight using the horizontal distance:

1.3 m = 2.0 m/s * t

Solving for t, we find t = 0.65 s.

Now, we can substitute the time of flight into the equation of motion:

4.1 m = v0 * 0.65 s + (1/2) * 9.8 m/s^2 * (0.65 s)^2

Simplifying and solving for v0, we find v0 = 9.6 m/s.

Therefore, the vertical component of the pebble's initial velocity needs to be 9.6 m/s in order to hit the window.

For more questions on: velocity

https://brainly.com/question/30237820

#SPJ8

Answer:

a! ^^

Explanation:

umm.....it'll help you progressively?

Answer: is below

⬇️⬇️

Explanation:

1) There is a rainbow in the sky.

2) Who is the man outside.

3) Seems like this person didn't write an answer for this!

4) Paul opened the door.

5) Mark is 15.

6) What's the time?

7) There's a rainbow!

8)Sue is writing a book.

9) Seems like this person didn't write an answer for this!

Answer: Calm

Explanation:

The definition that matches the bold word 'placidly' in the sentence "The canoe floated placidly down the river" is "calmly."

The word 'placidly' used in the given sentence describes the movement of the canoe down the river. The definition of the word 'placidly' means something that is calm or tranquil. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'A. calmly'. Here are the definitions of the given options: a. Calmly: In a peaceful and quiet manner b. Slowly: In a manner that is not fast or quick c. Merrily: In a cheerful and lively manner d. Solemnly: In a serious and formal manner. Thus, we can see that among the given options, the word 'placidly' can be matched with the definition 'calmly'.

More on placidly: https://brainly.com/question/18542855

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Modernity, a topic in the humanities and social sciences, is both a historical period (the modern era) and the ensemble of particular socio-cultural norms, attitudes and practices that arose in the wake of the Renaissance—in the "Age of Reason" of 17th-century thought and the 18th-century "Enlightenment".

In A Neural Architecture Search for Efficient Object Detection. The authors address the problem of designing efficient object detection models.

Efficient object detection is important for a variety of applications, such as real-time scene understanding, autonomous driving, and augmented reality.

The authors propose a neural architecture search (NAS) method for efficient object detection. NAS is a technique for automatically searching for the best architecture for a given task. The authors use NAS to search for a model that is both accurate and efficient.

The authors' approach is still under development, and there are some shortcomings that need to be addressed. For example, the search space is large, which can make the search process computationally expensive.

Overall, the authors' approach is a promising step towards designing efficient object detection models. However, there are still some challenges that need to be addressed before the approach can be widely deployed.

Learn more about author on

https://brainly.com/question/12851463

#SPJ1

Cassius sends Titinius down the hill on horseback to find out whether the soldiers by his tents are friends or enemies. In the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, the character of Cassius sends Titinius down the hill on horseback to check whether the soldiers by his tents are friends or enemies.

Cassius is a Roman politician who leads a group of conspirators that assassinate Julius Caesar. He has a deep mistrust of Mark Antony, one of Caesar's closest allies, and fears that he may have brought his soldiers to attack the conspirators. The scene where Cassius sends Titinius down the hill on horseback takes place during the Battle of Philippi.

The conspirators are fighting against the forces of Mark Antony and Octavius Caesar, two of Caesar's closest allies who have come to avenge his death. Cassius and Brutus are the leaders of the conspirators, and they are trying to win the battle and secure their position of power after Caesar's death. Cassius is initially reluctant to send Titinius down the hill, as he fears that he may be killed or captured by the enemy forces.

know more about William Shakespeare here

https://brainly.com/question/8912844#

#SPJ11

Eileen has a job. The first place Eileen should look for health care coverage is her employer. The costs will probably be the lowest for the most generous terms and coverage, because coverage under a policy through her employer is a group plan, which spreads the costs and risks among more people than individual plans do.

The company has more than 20 workers, and the employer pays 20% of workers' health insurance premiums. Assume that Eileen enrolls in her employer's group plan. If Eileen leaves her job she probably will be able to exercise her COBRA rights. If eligible, Eileen can remain on the group plan for up to 18 months as long as she pays the premiums. An additional administrative fee would not be due from Eileen.

Jared, Rodrigo, and Carl are shopping for health insurance coverage. To begin their research, they should look at compare plans to understand their coverage options.

Having a wide range of choices among doctors, hospitals, and other health services is very important to Rodrigo. All other factors being equal, Rodrigo is willing to pay more for greater access to a wide range of choices among doctors, hospitals, and other health services.

Rodrigo and his spouse plan to start a family in the near future. They are concerned about maternity and pediatric care. Carl has a risky lifestyle. He is concerned about emergency treatments and physical rehabilitation. Although Rodrigo and Carl have different concerns, they should follow appropriate steps to ensure the plans they consider adequately cover their individual requirements.

Jared has narrowed down his choices to two HMOs. He should check their accreditation. To assess their reputations and degrees of stability, Jared should investigate the reasons for significant changes in membership. All other factors being equal, Jared will probably favor the network in which the majority of his current providers participate.

Carl is young and healthy. Carl will probably take more risk when selecting his health insurance plan than someone, who, although the same age, has a history of leukemia.

He is more likely to choose a high-deductible health care plan (HDHP).

Why? Because between the two of them, he is the more healthy and, therefore, willing to take the risk.

To learn more about insurance premiums link is here

brainly.com/question/13724529

#SPJ4

Answer:

yes

Explanation:

It's intense all the way to the end and knowing he shot his own brother.

Answer:

i prefer takis fuego because of the sourness and the condition of the chips which camirizes in the taste buds which realeses nutritions called shhushhhhhhhhh

Explanation:

The correct answer to the question is:

D. They do not connect the two poems as a person would expect.

The allusions to Whitman in Galway Kinnell's "Vapor Trail Reflected in the Frog Pond" create tension because they do not establish a clear connection between the two poems as one would typically expect. The reader might anticipate a thematic or stylistic link between Kinnell's poem and the works of Whitman, but the allusions do not fulfill those expectations, thus creating tension.

First person refers to a narrative point of view in which the narrator is a character in the story and uses the pronouns "I" or "we." This point of view allows for a more personal and subjective perspective of the events and characters in the story.

Second person refers to a narrative point of view in which the narrator addresses the reader directly using the pronoun "you." This point of view creates a sense of immediacy and involvement for the reader, as if they are a part of the story.

Third person limited refers to a narrative point of view in which the narrator is not a character in the story but only has access to the thoughts and feelings of one character. The narrator uses the third person pronouns "he," "she," or "they" to refer to the characters, but the perspective remains limited to that of the single character

Third person omniscient refers to a narrative point of view in which the narrator has access to the thoughts, feelings, and motives of all the characters in the story. The narrator uses the third person pronouns "he," "she," or "they" to refer to the characters and is able to move freely between different characters' perspectives. This point of view allows for a broader and more objective understanding of the events in the story.

Learn more about point of view on

https://brainly.com/question/13107415

#SPJ1

The cultural context of a piece of literature is the social background of the characters or author.The correct answer is option C.

The cultural context of a piece of literature refers to the social, historical, and intellectual environment in which the text is created and interpreted. It encompasses various elements that shape the meaning and significance of the literary work.

While all the options provided have some relevance to understanding a text, the most accurate choice for defining cultural context is option C, the social background of the characters or author.

The social background of the characters or author encompasses factors such as their race, ethnicity, gender, class, religion, and nationality. These factors influence the values, beliefs, and experiences of the characters or author, which in turn shape the themes, perspectives, and messages conveyed in the literary work.

For example, understanding the cultural context of a novel set in the 19th century United States would involve considering the prevailing attitudes towards slavery, women's rights, and social class during that time period.

The cultural context also includes broader historical and intellectual influences that shape the literary work. It involves examining the societal events, political movements, and philosophical ideas that were prominent during the author's time.

These factors can provide insights into the author's motivations, intentions, and the overall significance of the text.

In conclusion, the cultural context of a piece of literature encompasses the social background of the characters or author, along with the historical, intellectual, and societal influences that shape the text. Understanding the cultural context is crucial for interpreting and appreciating the deeper meanings and implications of a literary work.

For more such questions literature,click on

https://brainly.com/question/20848481

#SPJ8

One example of verbal irony is when Juliet tells her mother, "I will not marry yet; and, when I do, I swear it shall be Romeo, whom you know I hate, rather than Paris." But readers know that Juliet is planning to marry Romeo that very night.

Answer:

1. G

2. B

3. A

4. J

5. F

6. D

7. E
8. C
9. H
10. I

Explanation:

Rhetoric is language that has been carefully crafted to convince, inspire, or inform the reader or listener about the speaker's or writer's perspective. The phrase may have come up when talking about politicians and political objectives.

Since antiquity, academics have argued about the range of rhetoric. Although some have restricted rhetoric to the particular field of political speech, many contemporary researchers liberate it to cover all facet of culture. In comparison to ancient studies, modern rhetorical studies include a far wider spectrum of topics perspective. .

Contemporary rhetoric studies human discourse as a whole, as opposed to classical rhetoric, which prepared speakers to be persuasive in public settings and institutions like courtrooms and assemblies.

Learn more about Rhetoric, from :

brainly.com/question/12327267

#SPJ1

Answer:

man vs fate

Explanation:

Can you give us an example of the passage? Because if no one else have read the story no 1 can give you an answer.