Abraham Lincoln is often described as an autocratic democratic leader because he believed in the supremacy of the Constitution and the rule of law, but he was also willing to take decisive action when necessary to preserve the Union and end slavery.
As President, Lincoln faced the difficult task of leading the country through a period of intense division and upheaval. He believed that the Constitution and the principles of democracy were the foundation of American society, but he also recognized that preserving the Union required strong and decisive leadership. In some cases, he was willing to take actions that went beyond the limits of traditional democratic governance, such as suspending the writ of habeas corpus and imposing martial law. However, he always did so with the goal of preserving the Union and advancing the cause of freedom for all Americans.
In this sense, Lincoln can be seen as an autocratic democratic leader who was willing to take bold action when necessary to protect the democratic values and principles that he held dear.
Learn More about Constitution here :-
https://brainly.com/question/9515546
#SPJ11
During the 1880s, Cameron was convicted of a felony and given a prison sentence. He observed that the peculiar prison that he was sent to looked like wheels with rows of cells emerging from a central hub. Which design or style did this particular prison use?
A.
telephone-pole style
B.
plantation-style system
C.
radial design
D.
campus style
1. From your prospective what could be a major internal problem/threat to the US? What incentives are creating this threat? Do you think their could or should be a way to change the incentives?
2. From your prospective what could be a major external threat that could cause problems in the US? What incentives are creating this threat? Do you think their could or should be a way to change the incentives?
Externally, geopolitical conflicts and tensions with other world powers such as China and Russia could pose a significant threat to the United States. The incentives driving this threat include competition for resources, influence and geopolitical dominance.
Changing incentives will require diplomatic efforts, dialogue and cooperation to build mutual trust and find common ground on global issues.
Whereas Internally, the polarization and fragmentation of society can pose a grave threat to the United States. The stimuli that fuel this threat include politics, economic inequality, and identity.
Changing incentives would mean focusing on shared values to foster dialogue, empathy, bridge divides and foster a sense of national unity and social cohesion.
To learn more about threats faced by U.S:
https://brainly.com/question/22059453
#SPJ4
________ refers to an official notice that the supreme court will review a case.
The statement is completed as: ''Writ of certiorari refers to an official notice that the Supreme Court will review a case.'' Therefore, the correct alternative is option A.
A writ of certiorari is a legal term that refers to an official notice from a higher court, such as the Supreme Court of the United States, indicating that the court has agreed to review a lower court's decision. This writ is issued at the discretion of the higher court, and it is not guaranteed that the court will choose to hear the case.
When a party files a petition for a writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, they are essentially asking the court to review the lower court's decision and potentially overturn it. The Supreme Court receives thousands of petitions for writs of certiorari each year, but only a small fraction of them are granted.
The writ of certiorari is an important legal mechanism that allows the Supreme Court to exercise its authority as the highest court in the United States. By reviewing lower court decisions, the court can ensure that the law is being applied fairly and consistently across the country.
In conclusion, the correct alternative is option A. Writ of certiorari.
Complete question is:
______ refers to an official notice that the Supreme Court will review a case. A) Writ of certiorari. B) Stare decisis. C) En banc review. D) Sua sponte.
See more about writ of certiorari at https://brainly.com/question/31643838.
#SPJ11
When you see this type of traffic sign, the listed speed
A: Is the maximum speed you can safely travel in this area.
B: Is the minimum speed allowed on the highway.
C: Is the speed you should drive during bad weather conditions.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Assume that the federal law and the NYC law do not conflict. How would you challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban in a different way? Select an option from the choices below and click Submit. a. You could argue that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban. b. You could argue that the law is unfair to movie theatres. c. You could argue that New Jersey has a conflicting law, which is supreme over the New York Law.
A is the correct answer.
If the federal law and the NYC law do not conflict, one can challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban by arguing that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban.
The New York City soda ban aimed to restrict the sale of large-sized sugary drinks in restaurants, food courts, and movie theaters. However, a federal court found that the city's Board of Health had overstepped its authority in passing the ban because the New York City Council had not approved the law. As a result, one can challenge the validity of the NYC Soda Ban by arguing that the NYC Health Department does not have the authority to pass such a soda ban.
To know more about NYC Health Department visit:
brainly.com/question/49579850
#SPJ11
the main source of law in the united states which was developed over many generations comes from
Answer:
l think is United States Constitution or the Common law system of English law
Explanation:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is:
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is Debra P. v. Turlington.
The case was decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1984. In Debra P. v. Turlington, a group of Florida high school students challenged the state's minimum competency examinations program, arguing that it violated their right to equal protection under the law. The students claimed that the testing program was not connected to the state's curriculum and that it unfairly penalized students who had not received instruction on the topics covered by the test.
The court agreed with the students and held that there must be a "rational nexus" between the testing program and the state's curriculum. The court noted that the purpose of the testing program was to ensure that students had acquired the basic skills and knowledge necessary to function as citizens, and that this goal could only be achieved if the testing program was based on the state's curriculum.
The court's decision in Debra P. v. Turlington set an important precedent in the development of educational law in the United States. It established that minimum competency examinations must be connected to the curriculum and that states must ensure that all students have access to the instruction necessary to succeed on these exams. The decision also highlighted the importance of equal protection under the law in the context of education and helped to ensure that all students have equal opportunities to succeed in school.
To learn more about competency examinations, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/31646918
#SPJ4
The court case that set the precedent that there must be a connection between the curriculum and minimum competency examinations is ___________
Cameron was astonished when a group of homeowners in her subdivision informed her that she could not have a toolshed in her yard. cameron felt that this was not fair especially since most of the other subdivision owners had toolsheds in their yards. what might best explain this?
Answer:
Cameron has not paid an extra fee to install a toolshed. OR According to the agreement she signed to receive the house, there was no mutual agreement that he/she could install one.
true or false? justification defenses provide that acts that are ordinarily criminal are justified or carry no criminal liability under certain circumstances.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value has two elements, they are
Select one:
a. the land value plus the value of the improvements on the land
b. the land value and area improvements
c. comparable improvements plus land value
d. none of the above
Answer:
d. none of the above
Explanation:
The cost depreciation approach of estimating value is a method of getting the value of real estate by estimating the price a buyer should pay for the property, based on the depreciation factors involved.
Using this approach, the value of the property is equals to the land cost, plus the total costs of construction, minus depreciation.
Therefore, the correct answer is none of the above as the answer is not in the given answer choices.
What are the 3 aspects they use in adult internal management system ?
The three aspects commonly used in adult internal management systems are self-awareness, self-regulation, and motivation. Self-awareness involves understanding one's emotions, strengths, and weaknesses. Self-regulation refers to the ability to control one's emotions and impulses, and motivation is the drive to achieve personal and professional goals.
These aspects work together to help individuals manage their internal states and achieve success in their personal and professional lives. 1. Planning: This aspect involves setting goals and objectives, determining the necessary resources and actions, and developing strategies to achieve the desired outcomes. 2. Organizing: This aspect focuses on allocating resources, assigning tasks, and establishing communication channels to ensure efficient and effective functioning of the management system. 3. Monitoring and Evaluation: This aspect involves regularly assessing performance against set objectives, identifying areas for improvement, and making necessary adjustments to ensure continuous growth and development. These three aspects work together to create a cohesive internal management system that enables adults to manage their personal and professional lives effectively.
To know more about internal management system visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13407997
#SPJ11
Which is these is most common likely contribute to a sexually hostile work environment
Answer: b
Explanation:
Answer:
Actions that can contribute to a hostile environment include sexual assaults or offensive touching of employees, demanding sexual favors from subordinates, and sexually oriented statements, comments, jokes, or pictures that are intended to create an intimidating or offensive workplace.
FILL THE BLANK.
___ was protected in the constitution many times without once being mentioned.
The right to privacy was protected in the constitution many times without once being mentioned.
Although the word "privacy" does not appear explicitly in the United States Constitution, the right to privacy has been recognized and protected by the courts through interpretation and legal precedent. The Constitution provides a framework of rights and protections that are open to evolving interpretation over time.
One of the key cases that established the right to privacy is Griswold v. Connecticut in 1965. In this case, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution protects an individual's right to privacy in the realm of marital relations and the use of contraception. The Court found that various provisions in the Bill of Rights, such as the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, create "zones of privacy" that protect personal autonomy and individual liberty.
Subsequent cases, such as Roe v. Wade (1973) and Lawrence v. Texas (2003), further expanded the concept of privacy, recognizing it as encompassing matters of reproductive rights, sexual relationships, and personal autonomy.
Therefore, while the specific term "privacy" may not be explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, the right to privacy has been upheld and protected by the courts through constitutional interpretation and legal analysis.
Learn more about constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/29799909
#SPJ11
choice of law clauses in contracts stipulate in advance which country's laws will apply to a dispute regardless of which court hears the case. true or false
Choice of law clauses in contracts are used to specify the country's laws that will apply to a dispute in case it arises, regardless of where the case is heard. These clauses are common in international contracts where parties involved may belong to different countries, and therefore, the question of which country's laws apply can be complex.
True. Choice of law clauses in contracts are used to specify the country's laws that will apply to a dispute in case it arises, regardless of where the case is heard. These clauses are common in international contracts where parties involved may belong to different countries, and therefore, the question of which country's laws apply can be complex. By stipulating in advance which country's laws will apply, parties can avoid uncertainty and potential disputes that may arise from conflicts of laws. The choice of law clause is binding, and parties are expected to abide by it unless it is challenged in court and proven to be unfair or unreasonable. Overall, choice of law clauses play a vital role in international business and help to streamline legal proceedings and ensure consistency in decision-making.
to know more about international visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31944920
#SPJ11
when did Stalin died?
Answer:
Explanation:
Joseph Stalin, second leader of the Soviet Union, died on 5 March 1953 at the Kunsevo Dacha, aged 74, after suffering a stroke. He was given a state funeral, with four days of national mourning declared. His body was subsequently embalmed and interred in Lenin's & Stalin's Mausoleum until 1961.
what represents a formal mode of control
How do i stop a person from commiting sauicide
Answer:
sunăla poliție ,sau incearca sa-l ajuți, Nush sper ca te-am ajutat
Case Study Ahmad and his friend, A.G. Pennypacker, have come up with a great idea they have developed a fluoroelastomer liner (a rubber lining) for oil tankers. With this innovation, they believe they can eliminate most oil spills that result from tanker accidents. The liner is highly resistant to fluctuations in temperature as well as physical punctures Ahmad wants to set up a company, but is unsure of his options and has come to you for advice for the type of business entity formation he should select. He has the following concerns: 1. He does not want his other business concerns being held liable should there be a lawsuit arising from use/sale of this product. 2. He wants an entity form that will minimize his tax liability. Based on the entity forms detailed in Chapter 35, select one you feel satisfies his concerns. Make sure to explain why it is the best for Ahmad and Pennypacker.
The option that is going to be the best choice for Ahmad and his friend is the Limited liability Partnership.
Why the Limited Liability would be the best choiceThis is because if the partnership is formed, no partner is going to be liable for the conduct or the negligence of the other person.
Each of the members is not going to be held liable in a way that is more than the share that they have.
The LLP is also going to reduce the tax liability that he has. Therefore this option is the best for him.
Read more on Limited Liability partnership here: https://brainly.com/question/25012970
Miranda rights must be advised only when a person is in custody.
True
False
Answer:
true
Explanation:
Miranda applies only to custodial interrogations, which means the police don't have to give Miranda warnings every time they question or talk to someone. Miranda rights come into play when the police arrest or detain someone. Detention here means that the person reasonably believes he or she is not free to leave.
Which of the following statements is true of the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act?
A. They are only imposed on foreign officials.
B. They are only imposed on foreign companies.
C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
D. Fines imposed on individuals do not exceed $10,000.
E. If corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, only the intermediaries are fined.
The correct statement regarding the criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act is: C. Fines imposed on individuals may not be paid by their employer.
The criminal penalties imposed for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) are not solely limited to foreign officials (Option A) or foreign companies (Option B). While foreign officials and companies can be held accountable under the FCPA, the scope of enforcement extends to any individual or entity, regardless of nationality, involved in corrupt practices.
Under the FCPA, fines imposed on individuals cannot be paid by their employer (Option C). This means that an individual found guilty of violating the FCPA cannot rely on their employer to cover the financial penalties. Each individual is personally responsible for paying the fines imposed as a result of their misconduct.
Furthermore, fines imposed on individuals for FCPA violations can exceed $10,000 (Option D). The actual fines can vary depending on the severity of the violation, the benefits obtained from the corrupt practices, and other factors considered during sentencing. The fines can be substantial, often reaching into the hundreds of thousands or even millions of dollars.
Lastly, if corrupt payments are made through intermediaries, both the intermediaries and the individuals involved can be fined (Option E). The FCPA does not shield intermediaries from penalties; rather, it holds all parties involved accountable for their role in the corrupt activities.
Learn more about Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
brainly.com/question/30626255
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements is TRUE regarding negligent misrepresentation?
1) False statement of fact made knowingly.
2) False statement of opinion made with no reasonable grounds to believe it to be true.
3) False statement of fact made without due care.
4) False statement of opinion made without fault on the part of the maker.
The true statement regarding negligent misrepresentation is option 3: False statement of fact made without due care. Negligent misrepresentation occurs when someone makes a false statement of fact without taking reasonable care to verify its accuracy, and another person relies on that false statement to their detriment.
Among the statements you provided, the true statement regarding negligent misrepresentation is:
3) False statement of fact made without due care.
Negligent misrepresentation occurs when someone makes a false statement of fact without exercising the proper care or reasonable diligence in ensuring its accuracy.
The person making the statement may not have knowingly intended to deceive others but failed to exercise the necessary caution in providing accurate information. This negligence can lead to liability if the false statement causes harm or damage to another party who relied on it.
Learn more about accurate information
https://brainly.com/question/26038141
#SPJ4
Law is a practical discipline, theory has no place in law. In two pages, Discuss with specific references to the law of contract.
Answer:
Check Explanation since we have to discus it.
''LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES''.
Explanation:
LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
Law is truly a practical discipline because at one time in our various lives we all have actually observe the law. Here, our reference is going to be on the LAW OF CONTRACT.
CONTRACT is a form of aggreement between two or more people. Contract may be written or maybe spoken. Contracts are enforceable under the law if there is a physical evidence that shows that their is surely an agreement.
We all at some point in our lives make agreements and sign a contract(written) or even just with mouth for instance your oath to be law abiding to school rules and regulations and many more.
When contract are breached, the LAW OF CONTRACT is being used in determining the guilty and the innocent. These laws are that is LAW OF CONTRACTS are made BASED ON REAL LIFE CASES which makes law LAW to be A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE.
Almost everyday in our various lives, we all practice law, hence LAW IS A PRACTICAL DISCIPLINE, THEORY HAS NO PLACE IN LAW.
2 practical ways that could ensure that employers abide by the labour laws in our country
Answer:
Giving rewards to employers who abide by the labour laws, and punishing those who don't.
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
1. You are a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state. Your state is running short of money to carry out some much needed programs. As a possible solution you suggest that the state government issue its own currency to people who work for it. The currency can be exchanged for dollar bills at a rate that is to be fixed by the state the first of every month. Is your idea constitutional?
2. Later in the legislative session mentioned in exercise 8, you become disenchanted with your fellow citizens when you learn that only 28 percent of those eligible to vote actually did so in the last election. Consequently, you pass a law requiring that everyone vote in every election. What arguments can you make in support of such a measure? Against?
Answer:
Explanation:
As a member of the legislature of a large Midwestern state, suggesting the issuance of a state currency as a solution to the financial challenges and funding for necessary programs raises constitutional considerations. The U.S. Constitution grants the federal government the power to coin money and regulate its value. Therefore, the idea of a state issuing its own currency might be in conflict with the Constitution.
Article I, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly prohibits states from coining money, emitting bills of credit, or making anything other than gold and silver coin legal tender for payment of debts. The purpose of this provision is to ensure a unified national currency and prevent individual states from creating their own currencies, which could lead to economic instability and confusion in interstate commerce.
While states have the authority to regulate various aspects of their economies, the exclusive power to issue currency lies with the federal government. Therefore, issuing a state currency that can be exchanged for dollar bills may raise concerns about encroaching on the federal government's constitutional authority.
However, it's worth noting that states can adopt alternative measures to address their financial challenges, such as implementing state bonds or seeking federal assistance, within the boundaries of the Constitution.
In response to the disappointment over low voter turnout in the previous election, passing a law that mandates compulsory voting raises important considerations regarding individual rights and freedoms.
Arguments in support of compulsory voting may include:
1) Civic Duty: Mandatory voting can be seen as a civic duty and a way to foster a more engaged and participatory society. It encourages citizens to actively participate in the democratic process and make their voices heard.
2) Representation: A higher voter turnout can lead to more representative and legitimate elected officials. It ensures that the views and interests of a broader segment of the population are reflected in the decision-making process.
3) Accountability: Compulsory voting can enhance the accountability of elected officials to the electorate. With a larger and more diverse pool of voters, politicians may be compelled to address a broader range of issues and be responsive to the concerns of the electorate as a whole.
On the other hand, arguments against compulsory voting include:
1) Freedom of Choice: Forcing individuals to vote can be seen as a violation of their freedom of choice and freedom of expression. Some people may choose not to vote as a form of political protest or because they feel uninformed or disenchanted with the available candidates or political system.
2) Informed Voting: Mandatory voting may lead to a higher number of uninformed or disinterested voters. Some argue that it is better to have a smaller, but more informed, electorate making thoughtful decisions rather than compelling everyone to vote regardless of their level of knowledge or interest.
3) Practical Challenges: Implementing and enforcing compulsory voting can present logistical challenges, such as ensuring that everyone is registered, tracking compliance, and administering penalties for non-compliance. These challenges can strain resources and potentially lead to unintended consequences.
im trying not to fail answer this to get points XD ,
Answer:
?????
Questions???
Explanation:
What is the question?
Consider the society/country you live in, or another other country with which you are familiar. Evaluate
that country according to substantive and procedural fairness, and consider which aspects of fairness you
would prioritise.
(a). To make the country fairer (according to the substantive judgement of fairness),
(i). do you prefer greater equality of income, happiness, or freedom? Why? [10]
(ii). Is there a trade-off between these aspects?
Pilots flying over a national wildlife refuge are requested to fly no lower than.
Pilots flying over a national wildlife refuge are requested to fly no lower than 3,000 feet above ground level.
Always fly at least 2000 feet above ground level (AGL) over all national marine sanctuaries, wildlife refuges, parks, and other noise-sensitive areas, according to the FAA's suggested best operating practice (see AC 91-36D). This safeguards local wildlife as well as the pilot.
Flying the coast at 2000 feet AGL gives pilots plenty of response time should a problem arise so they can prepare a safe landing. Flying high can lower the risk of bird strikes because investigations of the FAA's Wildlife Strike Database have revealed that the majority of bird hits happen at altitudes beneath 1000 feet AGL.
Direct flyovers or frequent runs through regions with sensitive species might endanger the animals and put pilots in danger. All motorized aircraft must abide by these NOAA overflight requirements.
To know more about Wildlife refer:
https://brainly.com/question/27180478
#SPJ4
What change caused agencies like the pinkerton detective agency to reduce private policing efforts?
Reduced crime led tofewer criminals to apprehend
some states began requiring security licences
criminals began to attack the private force officers
decreases in pay made private policing less lucrative.
There were several changes that caused agencies like the Pinkerton Detective Agency to reduce private policing efforts
What change caused agencies like the pinkerton detective agency to reduce private policing efforts?Some states began requiring security licenses, which made it harder for private policing agencies to operate without meeting certain requirements and regulations.
Criminals began to attack private force officers, which made the job more dangerous and less appealing for potential hires.
Decreases in pay made private policing less lucrative, which led to fewer individuals being interested in pursuing a career in the industry.
The growth of public police forces also played a role, as they began to take on more responsibility for maintaining law and order, which reduced the demand for private policing services.
Overall, these factors contributed to a decline in the popularity and effectiveness of private policing agencies, leading many to reduce their efforts or go out of business entirely.
Learn more about private policing efforts from
https://brainly.com/question/30479209
#SPJ1
Shawn files for bankruptcy. However, he does not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings. The farmhouse is later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings. Which of the following is true in this case?
A) Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
B) Shawn can use the discovery of the estate as a defense to his concealment.
C) Shawn is guilty of larceny as he did not reveal his estate during bankruptcy proceedings.
D) Shawn can be found guilty of counterfeiting.
E) Shawn is likely to be found not guilty since the estate was recovered and included in the proceedings.
Based on the available options and the situation described, the truth of the case is that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
What is the Offense of Concealment?The offense of Concealment is a term that is used to describe the offense committed with direct or indirect intent.
Generally, the concealer must know at the moment of committing the deed, in any of the normative ways, that the good comes from committing a deed provided by criminal law.
Therefore, in this case, since it is revealed that Shawn did not mention his farmhouse in Farmington in the bankruptcy proceedings and was later discovered by the mortgage firm and included in the proceedings, or will be concluded that Shawn is guilty of the offense of concealment.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is option A.
Learn more about the Offense of Concealment here: https://brainly.com/question/30033867
#SPJ1