Answer:
Explanation:
Dowry and bride price are two distinct payment systems in marriage that are practiced in many societies, including India. Both of these payment systems unite families, but they do so in different ways.
Dowry is a payment made by the bride's family to the groom's family before or during the wedding ceremony. It includes gifts, money, and other valuable items. The purpose of the dowry is to make the bride more attractive to possible husbands by showing her family's wealth and status. The groom's family sees the dowry as a way of compensating them for the expenses they will incur in taking care of the bride. Dowry payments can also serve as a way for the bride's family to maintain control over their daughter's welfare in her new household. Therefore, the dowry payment system unites families by creating a bond between the bride's family and the groom's family, ensuring that the bride is taken care of after she is married, and maintaining control over the daughter's welfare.
On the other hand, bride price is a payment made by the groom's family to the bride's family to compensate them for the work and children of one of their daughters. Bride price payments often involve animals, cash, or other valuable items. The purpose of the bride price is to recognize the bride's family's contributions to the new household by compensating them for their daughter's labor and potential fertility. Therefore, the bride price payment system unites families by creating a bond between the groom's family and the bride's family, recognizing the bride's family's contributions, and establishing the groom's family's status as a provider for the bride and her family.
In both systems, the payment of money or goods creates a connection between the families of the bride and groom. However, the purpose of each payment is different. The dowry is intended to ensure the bride's welfare, while the bride price is intended to recognize the bride's family's contributions to the new household.
The presidential election of 1888, won by Benjamin Harrison, is an example of how a candidate can
A. be chosen by the House of Representatives after tying in the electoral vote
B. win the election while also winning the popular vote
C. be chosen by the Senate after tying in the electoral vote
D. win the election despite losing the popular vote
Answer:
D. win the election despite losing the popular vote
Answer:
I agree I think D is the answer
Explanation:
:)
John F. Kennedy, Nomination Speech
January 20, 1961
What was Kennedy's purpose in making these statements?
O A.
to reflect on the failures of previous administrations and solutions to fix the current problems
О в.
to convince America's youth to sign up for the military to assist the war effort in Vietnam
O c.
to uphold the decisions made by past presidencies and promise to continue their policies
OD.
to challenge Americans, especially young people, to join him in the fight for change in this new era
The answer to the question is C, to uphold the decisions made by past presidencies and promise to continue their policies
HELP PLEASE
Which BEST explains why the major powers of Europe became involved in the conflict between Austria-Hungary and Serbia in 1914?
А
They thought that the expansionist policies of the two nations would reach their borders.
B
They were driven by humanitarian concerns for the civilians.
C The monarchies were all interrelated.
D
They were all bound by treaty to one side or the other.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
The primary reasons a lot of countries got involved was because they either had treaties with Serbia or Austria-Hungary. Like France being allies with Serbia and Germany being allies with Austria-Hungary. In the end Serbia had more allies and they won the war
8. Mao's role as a Communist Commissar was to control what the people within the party ____
Mao's role as a Communist Commissar was not specifically to control the people within the party, but rather to ensure that Communist Party members were following the party line and adhering to Communist ideology.
As a Communist Commissar, Mao was responsible for political education and propaganda work among Party members and was tasked with ensuring that the Party's policies were being implemented correctly. He was also responsible for maintaining Party discipline and enforcing Party directives.
Mao's role as a Commissar was important in the early years of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as the Party faced many challenges and internal divisions. Mao's leadership and political acumen helped to unify the Party and build support for Communist ideology among the Chinese people.
Later, as Mao rose to power within the Party and became Chairman of the Communist Party of China, his role expanded to include overall leadership of the country. However, even in this role, Mao continued to prioritize Communist ideology and Party unity, often at the expense of individual freedoms and human rights.
#SPJ1
Why did Reagan earn the nickname "Teflon President"?
A. He was constantly in trouble with the media and law
B. His scandals lost a number of international allies
C. He was able to bring together countries as allies
D. His popularity never decreased after scandals
Ronald Reagan earned the nickname "Teflon President" due to the fact that he was never held accountable for the shortcomings of his government.
Why was Ronald Reagan dubbed the "Teflon President"?
Since criticism and blame never seemed to attach to him, Ronald Reagan was sometimes referred to as the "Teflon President". Former politician and actor Ronald Reagan was elected as the 40th President of the United States, serving from 1981 to 1989. Under his administration, the nation's wealth was restored with the intention of securing "peace by strength" overseas. The phrase "Teflon president" refers to a leader who has an apparent miraculous capacity to deflect responsibility.
A Teflon president is so charming that nothing unwelcome can stick to him, just like a Teflon pan. No matter how much dirt his adversaries turn up, the voters still overlook his transgressions. owing to his capacity to accept praise for accomplishments while avoiding taking responsibility for mistakes.
Learn more about Reagan:
https://brainly.com/question/12067217
#SPJ1
The excerpt below describes conditions in Florida in the 1920s.
Governor Sidney Catts was a prohibitionist, and many Florida counties already
prohibited alcohol even before the ratification of the 18th Amendment. Nevertheless
Florida became a center of illegal alcohol in the 1920s.
Which statement best explains why these violations occurred?
Answer:
These violations occurred as very few Floridians supported prohibition.
Explanation:
The 18th Amendment, known as Prohibition Amendment, was ratified on January 16, 1919. The Prohibiton amendment banned manufacturing, transportation, and sale of intoxicating liquors across the nations.
In the 1920s, after prohibition Floridians objected the amendment stating that the prohibition violated their right to drink. Being in proximity with Caribbean, bootlegging paved its way into Florida.
Therefore, the reason for violation in the given instance is because very few Floridians supported prohibition.
If we accept moral or cultural relativism, would it make sense to talk abc
moral progress? Why? What would be the basis for understanding moral
rogress?
If we accept moral or cultural relativism, the concept of moral progress becomes problematic.
Is moral progress possible in a relativistic framework?In moral relativism, there is no objective standard by which to measure moral progress since moral values and norms are determined by individual cultures or personal beliefs. What may be considered morally progressive in one culture may be seen as regressive or even immoral in another.
So, without universal standard for morality, the notion of moral progress loses its foundation. Progress implies a movement towards an objectively better state, but in relativism, what is considered better or worse is subjective.
Read more about relativism
brainly.com/question/10627704
#SPJ1
As restrictions and prohibitions are multiplied in the Empire, the people grow poorer and poorer. When the
people are subjected to overmuch government, the land is thrown into confusion. ... The greater the numb-
of laws and enactments, the more thieves and robbers there will be."
What were Lao-Tzu's views on government?
Lao-Tzu's views on government emphasized the negative consequences of excessive governance, such as increased poverty, societal disorder, and the proliferation of criminal behavior.
Lao-Tzu, the ancient Chinese philosopher, and founder of Taoism, advocated for a minimalistic approach to governance. His views centered around the idea that an overly intrusive government, characterized by excessive restrictions, prohibitions, and an abundance of laws and enactments, had detrimental effects on society. Lao-Tzu believed that when the government imposed too many regulations and intervened excessively in people's lives, it led to the impoverishment of the population and the disruption of social harmony. He argued that a heavy-handed government created a climate of confusion and disorder, fostering an environment conducive to criminal activities.
Lao-Tzu's philosophy suggested that a wise ruler should govern with minimal interference, allowing individuals to live by the natural order of things. He believed in the importance of non-action (wu-wei) and the cultivation of inner virtue rather than relying on external regulations and control. Lao-Tzu's emphasis on a less intrusive government and the negative consequences of excessive governance resonated with the Taoist principles of simplicity, spontaneity, and harmony with nature.
For more questions on Lao-Tzu's
https://brainly.com/question/28300061
#SPJ8
which statement best describes a difference between the french and american revolution
Answer: the American revolution created a lasting form of liberal government, while the French Revolution did not.
Explanation:
For the apex users
What is Keeyyata addeessa
Its is an app, and a yt vid
Gemma is an Army information system technician repairing a gyrocompass that won’t consistently find true north. What MOST likely is Gemma’s specialization?
missile and space systems
nodal network systems
multichannel transmission systems
test measurement and diagnostic equipment
Based on the scenario provided, it's most likely that Gemma's specialization is test measurement and diagnostic equipment. Therefore Option no 4 is correct
As an Army information system technician, Gemma's part involves repairing and maintaining information systems and outfit used by the service. A gyrocompass is a nautical tool that helps determine direction, and Gemma is specifically working on a gyrocompass that isn't constantly chancing true north.
This suggests that the issue is related to estimation or alignment, which would fall under the horizon of test dimension and individual outfit( TMDE) specialists. TMDE specialists use technical tools and outfit to diagnose and repair issues with complex systems and outfit, similar as nautical instruments like gyrocompasses.
Learn more about gyrocompass:-
https://brainly.com/question/29509090
#SPJ1
Explain what prevented Colonial America from becoming a united empire?
Why were the Native Americans against assimilation
Answer:
About 100,000 Native Americans were forced to attend these schools, forbidden to speak native languages, forced to renounce native beliefs, and forced to give up their Native American identities, including their names. Many children were placed with white families as indentured servants.
Explanation:
How did Native Americans in the Great Plains make their living? How did the Fort Laramie Treaty disrupt this way of living?
Answer:
marten luthar is amongin
In chapters 7,8 and 9of the book Give Me Liberty by Eric Foner (brief 6th edition) explain in three paragraphs two major arguments in support of the constitution given by the federalists represented by Alex Hamilton and two major arguments against the constitution put forth by the anti federalists represented by Thomas Jefferson. Cite the text book chapter as your source
Give Me Liberty! explores how, from colonial times to the early twenty-first century, freedom has taken on different meanings, existed in different social contexts, and had different borders.
What were the major arguments in support of the Constitution given by the Federalists? What were the major arguments against the Constitution put forth by the Anti-Federalists?Americans had trouble finding money to pay the war since their country was at war. The Congress released a huge (written promises to pay money back from a loan). The government was unable to make the loan payments because it lacked a source of funding or income. shays defying the established order. Crowds of (debt-ridden) farmers shut down the courts in Massachusetts in late 1786 and early 1787 to stop the seizure of their lands for failing to pay taxes. Gov. James Bowdoin put an end to them. The struggle against authority made it clear that the government needed to be reinforced in order to create consistent money-based policy. People began to think that the Articles of Confederation weren't working because money is constantly an issue.
Only those powers necessary for the fight for independence were specifically granted to the national government by the Articles of Confederation People consequently came to believe that it solely supported specific American regions.
The anti-Federalists sought a weaker central government, whereas the Federalists advocated a strong government and powerful executive branch. The Federalists believed that the new constitution was adequate and did not desire a bill of rights. A bill of rights was demanded by the anti-federalists.
The "Constitution," in Hamilton's opinion, struck the ideal balance between liberty and authority. He thought that the constitution was already set up to guard against abuses of power. But a lot of individuals, even now, disagree with Hamilton, and they are known as "Anti federalists." They continued saying that the new administration will be headed by creditors, businessmen, and other such figures. They were regarded as being opposed to the interests of the average American. The absence of unprotected rights like trial by jury and free expression was noted by Anti Federalist. Interesting themes regarding what people desired from their governments. Hamilton, however, gained support by pledging to pass a bill of rights. Madison kept his word and developed the“Bill of rights” That protected its people.
To know more about Give Me Liberty,by Eric Foner,refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28461496
#SPJ1
How does a monopoly increase a corporation's profits?
A. by using mass production to lower costs
B. by minimizing financial risks for investors
C. by outlawing labor unions
D. by eliminating competition to control prices
Question 2(Multiple Choice Worth 5 points)
[06.05 MC]Read the selection and answer the question that follows:
First Inaugural Address of Andrew Jackson, selected quotes
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 4, 1829
"Fellow-Citizens:
… In administering the laws of Congress I shall keep steadily in view the limitations as well as the extent of the Executive power trusting thereby to discharge the functions of my office without transcending its authority. …
In such measures as I may be called on to pursue in regard to the rights of the separate States I hope to be animated by a proper respect for those sovereign members of our Union, …
This I shall aim at the more anxiously both because it will facilitate the extinguishment of the national debt, the unnecessary duration of which is incompatible with real independence, …
that the spirit of equity, caution and compromise in which the Constitution was formed requires that the great interests of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures should be equally favored …
As long as our Government is administered for the good of the people, and is regulated by their will; as long as it secures to us the rights of person and of property, liberty of conscience and of the press, it will be worth defending …"
According to Jackson, what is required of the national government for it to "be worth defending"?
The national government must favor the interests of agriculture over all others.
The national government must restrict freedoms of the press and assembly.
The national government must allow the president to act as he sees fit.
The national government must protect people's rights and property.
Answer:
well it would be spirit and equity
HELP ME ASAP PLEASE AND THANKS
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Ronald Regan, because the economy was really well under his terms in office.
My friend says that they're leaning into Anarchist Ideology. What is it, and is it a good or bad thing?
Anarchist ideology is a diverse and decentralized political philosophy that advocates for the elimination of hierarchical authority, such as governments, in favor of a society based on voluntary cooperation, mutual aid, and individual freedom.
Anarchists argue that such authority structures perpetuate inequality, oppression, and coercion and that a truly just and egalitarian society can only be achieved through the abolition of these hierarchies. Anarchism encompasses a wide range of perspectives and approaches, from individualist anarchism to collectivist anarchism, with variations in tactics and strategies.
Common themes include opposition to the state, capitalism, and other forms of oppressive power, as well as an emphasis on direct action, grassroots organizing, and community autonomy. As for whether anarchism is a good or bad thing, opinions differ widely. Supporters of anarchism argue that it promotes individual freedom, voluntary cooperation, and social equality.
They believe that by removing centralized authority, people can self-organize and make decisions collectively, leading to a more equitable and harmonious society. Critics, on the other hand, express concerns about the potential for chaos, lack of security, and the absence of a mechanism to address collective problems and conflicts.
know more about Anarchist here:
https://brainly.com/question/843610
#SPJ8
2) Congress comes to together and decides to close the borders to the United States from both Canada and Mexico. They say that no one is allowed in the United States from either of these countries and no citizen of the United States is permitted to enter into either of these countries unless there are extreme circumstances. The U.S. Congress is tired of illegal immigration and thinks that this will send these countries a message. They also dislike Canada's political beliefs and believe their citizens are influencing U.S. citizens negatively.
What power(s) is Congress using?
What line from the scenario supports your opinion?
The Congress of the United States is the country's legislative body. It was formed by the Constitution of 1789 and is fundamentally distinct from the administrative and judicial departments of government.
Do legislation requirements in both Houses of Congress apply?Before being considered by the President, a law must to pass both houses of Congress. A Conference Committee made up of representatives from both chambers is established to align the measures.
What distinguishes Congress from the president?While some foreign policy authorities are shared by the president and Congress or are not expressly delegated by the Constitution, others are. Conflicts between these two pillars of government over foreign policy are common, especially when it comes to military operations, international assistance, and immigration.
To learn more about constitution here:
https://brainly.com/question/30337690
#SPJ1
How have the teachings of Judaism influenced modern society? (Image included of the answer choices) asap pleasw
Answer: C. Jewish ethical and Moral traditions form the basis for many democratic societies.
Explanation:
Due to evictions from their ancestral homeland in the Holy Land, first by the Babylonians and then by the Romans, Jews are spread out across the entire world. They are a very proud and cultural people however, who have followed their laws and moral traditions regardless of where they were.
As a result, they have influenced the laws of many democratic countries including Roman Law and English law. Even the U.S. Constitution has some parts of it inspired by Jewish ethical and moral tradition.
This term refers to the domestication of animal and livestock
Answer:Livestock Ranching
Explanation: this means raising domestic animals on farm land
By the fall of 1914, the nations of Europe had been competing for twenty-five years for colonies. natural resources, and markets. Explain at least two actions the nations of Europe took during these years of competition that guaranteed that almost any spark would ignite a war that would pull all of Europe into it.
Nationalistic pride, Imperialism, and symbiotic relationships all contributed to the escalating tensions that would lead to war.
What are the actions that ignited a war?The heir to the Austro-Hungarian crown, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, and his wife was killed on June 28, 1914, by a terrorist with support from Serbia.
A series of political, diplomatic, and military choices were made by Europe's leaders during the ensuing crisis that turned a small-scale struggle in southeast Europe into a world war.
On July 28, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia with support from Germany. France entered the conflict as a result of Russia's assistance to Serbia.
Russia and France both received wartime declarations from Germany on August 1.
Britain and its empire entered the war on August 4 as a result of Germany's violation of British and Belgian neutrality concerns over German dominance in Europe.
These behaviors are a reflection of the aspirations, concerns, and fears of the European powers.
The choice to go to war was decided in the context of rising nationalism, militarism, rivalries between empires, and the struggle for dominance and influence.
The leaders of Europe were prepared to wage war in order to protect or advance national interests, and their decisions were influenced by a variety of factors, including long- and short-term foreign policy objectives, domestic political pressures, previous crises, and the system of adversarial alliances that had evolved over the preceding 35 years.
Therefore, the two actions were nationalism and imperialism.
Learn more about the Europe war below;
https://brainly.com/question/12298257
#SPJ1
Which statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause-
and-effect relationship shown in the diagram?
Cause
The British tax
American colonists but
don't give them any say
in the British
government.
Effect
American colonists
declare their
independence from
Great Britain.
OA. The British treatment of the American colonists was one of the
causes of the American Revolution.
B. The British treatment of American colonists had no effect on daily
life in the colonies.
OC. The British treatment of American colonists was one of the
reasons the British got rid of their colonies in North America.
D. The British treatment of American colonists inspired support for
the British king.
The British treatment of American colonists was one of the reasons the British got rid of their colonies in North America statement is the most likely conclusion you can draw from the cause-and-effect relationship shown in the diagram. Thus, option C is correct.
The history of England, Scotland, and, after 1707, Great Britain's development of authority over, settlement of, and colonization of the American continents is known as the British colonization of the Americas. The process of colonization started in the late 16th century with unsuccessful attempts by England to build long-term colonies in the North. In 1607, Jamestown, Virginia, became the first of the long-lasting English settlements in the New World.
At the time, there were about 30,000 Algonquian inhabitants of the area. More colonies were founded in North America, Central America, South America, and the Caribbean over the following several centuries. The majority of British colonies in the Americas eventually attained independence, although several colonies have chosen to continue to be British Overseas Territories, remaining under British rule.
Learn more about British colonization here:
https://brainly.com/question/1160519
#SPJ1
How were women affected by the Depression?
People expected women to give up their jobs to unemployed men.
Women became drifters and stayed in homeless shelters.
Women started their own businesses to support their families.
Answer:
Women tried to find work as many of their husbands who used to earn the money were now without a job.
Do supply side economics relate to the industrialist philosophies like social Darwinism
and free market capitalism? Why?
Answer:
Reagan´s supply-side economics embraced the ideas about the pursuit of personal wealth and the free-market, claiming that it was the wealthy who should get governmental support to be able to prosper and create more jobs to benefit the whole society.
In the end, only the already wealthy corporations were benefited while poor people paid more taxes despite seeing programs meant to support them being shut down by the Reagan Administration.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism supports the competitive pursuit of personal wealth, justifying the economic power of the wealthy.
Adam Smith´s free-market system claimed that supply and demand were meant to should rule the economic system without any governmental interference.
You are waiting in line to use the diving board at your local pool .while watching people dive into the pool from the board you realize that using a diving board to spring into the air before a dive is a good example of Newton’s third law of motion explain how a diving board illustrates Newton’s third law of motion.
Because anytime a thing produces a force on another, that other object will exert an equal and opposite force on the first, diving is related to Newton's third law. Every action has an equal and opposite response, according to the third rule of motion. (When the diver leaps from the diving board.
What is Newton's third law.?Generally, Newton's third law states that if an object A applies a force to another object B, then the second object must apply a force to the first object that is equal in magnitude but in the opposite direction.
This rule illustrates a certain symmetry that may be seen in nature, since it states that forces always act in pairs, and that a body cannot exert a force on another without also being subject to a force itself.
When you walk, you exert an action force on the ground of the roadway, which causes a reaction force that propels you ahead. In other words, you push the street when you walk.
When a person shoots a gun, the action force pulls the bullet outside of the gun, while the reaction force causes the gun to move backward.
Read more about Newton's third law.
https://brainly.com/question/974124
#SPJ1
what role did the military play in the government of latin anerica?
The military has historically played a significant role in the governments of several Latin American countries often intervening in politics and governance.
What role has the military played in the government?The military has had a complex relationship with the governments of Latin America by frequently exerting influence through direct involvement in politics or through indirect pressure.
Throughout the 20th century, military coups were common leading to the establishment of military regimes in various countries. These regimes often involved military leaders assuming power by suspending democratic processes, and implementing authoritarian policies.
Read more about latin america
brainly.com/question/1486837
#SPJ1
Briefly explain ONE specific military action that added territory to the United States in the period 1840 to 1855.
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was a military action that resulted in the addition of land to the United States in 1848. In addition to incorporating the states of California, Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, and Wyoming, it put a stop to the Mexican-American War.
What is the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo?The United States and Mexico's war was put to an end by this treaty, which was signed on February 2nd, 1848. Mexico agreed to give up 55% of its territory, which included sections of Oklahoma, Kansas, and Wyoming as well as the modern states of California, Nevada, Utah, and New Mexico, as well as the majority of Arizona and Colorado.
The pact effectively reduced Mexico's area in half and increased the United States' territory by double. Both countries were impacted long after this geographical transaction.
The war and treaty brought the United States closer to the Pacific Ocean and gave the developing nation a wealth of ports, minerals, and other natural resources.
Learn more about the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, from:
brainly.com/question/21603849
#SPJ2
this is a map of Asia
Answer:
3
Explanation:
Answer:
3
Explanation: