How is a summary different from a book review?(1 point) A book review includes the most important details in the book, while a summary includes only the main ideas. A book review includes the opinions of others that have read the book, while a summary includes only the opinion of the person writing it. A book review may include the opinions of the person writing the review, while a summary should not include opinions. A book review includes ideas in the writer's own words, while a summary copies quotations directly from the text.

Shakespeare and Wordsworth both use suspense, surprise, and ambiguity to play with the expectations and presumptions of their readers. Shakespeare makes use of both personification and imagery in this sonnet.

1) Shakespeare frequently accomplishes this by adding unanticipated scenes, people, or imagery. Shakespeare frequently changes the meter in his poem, omits important words in the middle of phrases, and rearranges words to create an air of surprise and uncertainty. This gives the poem a deeper level of complexity and thought-provoking and compels readers to look more closely.

2. Personification is a literary device that is used to give characteristics of the human experience to an animal, a thing, or an idea. Shakespeare, for instance, personifies death in the sonnet as a "gentleman" who "knocks at the door." This technique of speaking about death lends the poetry a more humanitarian feel.

The poetry also employs imagery to evoke clear mental images. For instance, the metaphor of death "knocking at the door" makes one think of a timeless figure rapping on the door of an old house. Readers are both frightened and intrigued by this.

To learn more about Shakespeare link is here

brainly.com/question/30851195

#SPJ4

Answer:

part a is answer a and part b is d? correct me if im wrong

Explanation:

Answer: around 1000 or 600

Explanation: Depends what business it is and plus you need supplies such as packaging and the stuff to make something if you are doing a homemade store such as necklaces or rings

Swift provides a proposal in "A Modest Proposal" to end the Irish famine in the early 1700s.

What are the satires in "A Modest Proposal"?

Swift utilised satire in this instance to ridicule the affluent people's treatment of the impoverished people during the famine and to convey the issue of poverty in Ireland. To be clear, Swift is not advocating eating children as a feasible solution to the issue; rather, he is highlighting the problems he sees with the Irish government while illustrating the uncaring and harsh mentality of the privileged. Swift has an intense, sombre tone throughout "A Modest Proposal" as a whole.

A Modest Proposal makes its argument using a technique known as satire, which is the use of sarcasm, comedy, or exaggeration to critique the beliefs of others. Swift plainly has no true desire for the Irish people to sell their children as food, but he is attempting to make a point by utilising the absurd idea.

The pamphlets that were being distributed at the time are parodied in Swift's song "A Modest Proposal." He emphasises this by making fun of the fake modesty in the tone of many of his contemporaries' pamphlets through the use of language throughout the poem, including the term "modest" in the title. Although their approach appeared logical, their suggestions revealed a British ruling class arrogance toward their citizens in Ireland that is all too prevalent.

Swift expresses his mounting rage at the ineptitude of Irish politicians, the hypocrisy of the affluent, the oppression of the English, and the poverty and misery he seen so many Irish people experiencing in his proposal. Swift's disdain for the Irish people's seeming unwillingness to stand up for themselves is shown in "A Modest Proposal," which laments the grim predicament of an Ireland that is almost entirely exploited by England. He claims that the Irish themselves are also to blame for the level of poverty in their country, not only the English.

To learn more about "A Modest Proposal" from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/9066127

#SPJ1

read the opening paragraphs in “a modest proposal” and find the satirical techniques, or how the author showed you satire in the beginning. i need this in a PQC. please answer asap, thank u

The name of the knife with a long, wide blade is a cleaver. A large, rectangular-shaped knife with the general name "cleaver" is used to cut thick meats, as well as vegetables and fruits with thick skin.

Cleavers typically have heavier, thicker blades that can separate meat from bones. Since the Acheulean era, cleavers have been a common tool. In the late 17th century, the word "cleaver" was frequently spelled smart. The most adaptable knife blade shapes are drop point, which are suitable for specific jobs requiring precision. The greatest blade shapes for piercing, puncturing, and stabbing are tanto point, spear point, and needle point. The blade of a leaf knife has a spine that slopes downward and an upward-curving sharp edge.A cleaver is a large knife that varies in its shape but usually resembles a rectangular-bladed hatchet. It is largely used as a kitchen or butcher knife and is mostly intended for splitting up large pieces of soft bones and through thick pieces of meat.

To know more about frequently refer :

brainly.com/question/29806804

#SPJ4

The change that should be made in sentence 12 is to Change how to How. Thus, the correct option for this question is B.

The significance of changing words in literature is determined by the fact that new words are borrowed or invented, the meaning of old words drifts, and morphology develops or decays. It makes the literature more attractive and useful compared to the previous.

According to the context of this question, each sentence needs some changes until it is written in an exact correct format. The same condition is applied in sentence 12 where the word how is used and has to be replaced by How.

Therefore, the change that should be made in sentence 12 is to Change how to How. Thus, the correct option for this question is B.

To learn more about Word changes, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/24885032

#SPJ1

The Articles of Confederation led to the creation of Congress within the national government.

Answer:

Sylvia probably values simplicity and nature over the hustle and bustle of the city. She may also be adaptable to change and able to appreciate the beauty and uniqueness of each environment she is in.

Kelley Armstrong would always include evil dolls and undead girls in her tales about girls and dolls, much to the chagrin of her teachers. She could not be persuaded to compose "normal" stories.

The current capital of Earth is New Chicago, a metropolis with at least 10 million residents.

In Chicago, Illinois, in the United States, the Greek Revival-style home formerly known as the Henry B. Clarke residence is now a house museum. Having been finished around 1836, it is generally regarded as the oldest remaining house constructed in Chicago.

It has functioned as Chicago's centre. The three main migrations that took place in the US—the influx of immigrants from Europe, the exodus of black families from the South, and the move from rural to urban areas—were all significantly influenced by the town.

To know more about Chicago, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/24096893

#SPJ1

Answer:first part is right

Explanation:

Answer:

In my opinion, at the end of The Giver Jonas and Gabriel just fainted and before he closed his eyes he had memories that were getting recalled.

The reason why I strongly believe that Jonas was just remembering his past is because before Jonas closed his eyes, Jonas noticed the houses in the other community he reached to. When he went on the sled with Gabriel he perceived the memories he experienced during the training with the giver. That moment just returned the memories he had. Another moment they had before they fainted was when he saw the houses filled with people singing, laughing, enjoying. I am assuming that Jonas just had a theory and the voices simply echoed in his mind due to the state he was in. The reason why they passed out is probably because of their weakness. They didn't get a good source of good and warmth and were very tired of travelling form one community to another. In conclusion, Jonas and Gabriel just passed out and the people on the other community will probably take care of them and give them the warmth the other community didn't. Hope this helps!

Answer:

Declarative

Explanation:

It is simply stating that you went somewhere. Hope this helped :)

The best way to revised this text is to say, "Channel Six’s science... Derwent University’s ... It's a once-in-a-decade ...shouldn’t miss... I'll be over the moon."

Apostrophes are used like this:

With contractions like in you're or in terms of belonging, like Marco's house.

How can I fix this paragraph?

Add an apostrophe where:

so the complete text is gonna be

Tonight, the release of energized particles from the sun, coupled with particularly helpful overnight conditions, is predicted to make the Northern Lights (Aurora Borealis) visible much further south than normal.

Interviewed earlier today by Chris Ross, Channel's Six science correspondent, Derwent University's Professor Andrew Higgins told her that, "It's a once-in-a-decade opportunity that people really shouldn't miss. Thanks to several fronts of high air pressure, the skies tonight will be particularly clear. I'll be over the moon come the dawn."

For more information on apostrophes, see brainly.com/question/18077041.

#SPJ4

Answer:

D romeo has fought tybalt in the past and lost

Explanation:

Answer:

B. Romeo is now married to Juliet, who is Tybalt's cousin.

Explanation:

Answer: A dialogue tag is a phrase that precedes, breaks up, or follows a bit of written dialogue and establishes who the speaker is, how they are delivering the dialogue, and whether or not a new speaker is talking.

Answer:

Dialogue tags are those short little phrases in dialogue that identify the speaker.

a) I, is the correct answer.

The correct answer to the question is "I." Andrew and I worked overtime on Saturday to ensure that the customer's order would be shipped on Monday. The pronoun "I" is the correct choice in this sentence because it functions as the subject of the sentence, which refers to the individuals who worked overtime on Saturday.

The pronoun "myself" is a reflexive pronoun, which means it can only be used when the subject and object of a sentence refer to the same person. In this case, "myself" would not be the appropriate pronoun to use because it does not make sense to say "Andrew and myself worked overtime on Saturday." The correct phrasing would be "Andrew and I worked overtime on Saturday."

Similarly, the pronoun "me" is an object pronoun, which means it can only be used as the object of a sentence. In this case, "me" would to use as the subject of the sentence because it does not make sense to say "Andrew and me worked o not be the appropriate pronounvertime on Saturday." The correct phrasing would be "Andrew and I worked overtime on Saturday."

In summary, the correct pronoun to use in this sentence is "I," which functions as the subject of the sentence and refers to the individuals who worked overtime on Saturday.

know more about pronoun here,

https://brainly.com/question/1494508

#SPJ11

The given text is an excerpt from "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe. It describes the counterculture of the 1960s, which was characterized by a rejection of societal norms and a focus on individual freedom and expression.The phrase "More sports for everyone, group spirit, fun, and you don't have to think, eh?" represents the desire for leisure and enjoyment without the need for critical thinking and hard work.

The author's use of repetition with "organize and organize and super organize super-super sports" emphasizes the emphasis on organization and regimentation in sports. Similarly, the desire for "more cartoons in books" and "more pictures" reflects a preference for entertainment that does not require deep thought or analysis. The phrase "The mind drinks less and less" suggests that people are becoming less intellectually engaged and more focused on sensory experiences. The reference to "impatience" suggests a desire for immediate gratification, which is reinforced by the image of "highways full of crowds going somewhere, somewhere, somewhere, nowhere."

This passage describes a society that is becoming increasingly mobile and nomadic, with people moving from place to place in search of adventure and excitement. The image of "towns turn[ing] into motels" suggests that traditional notions of home and community are being eroded by this trend. Overall, this passage reflects the countercultural values of the 1960s, which were characterized by a desire for individual freedom, leisure, and sensory experience.

To know more about Tom Wolfe visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30324258

#SPJ11

Answer:

The next day, Jonas finds the Giver in incredible pain, and the Giver asks him to take some of the pain away. The Giver transmits the terrible memory of a battlefield covered with groaning, dying men and horses. Jonas, himself horribly wounded, gives water to a young soldier and then watches him die.

Explanation:

Answer:

Jonas gave Gabriel memory of sailing in the lake. It was a pain of being injured during a war. Jonas was so happy to be the receiver at the starting of chapter 16.

unnecessary

___________

Answer:

See below.

Explanation:

June 29th 2020

Notice: Quiz Competition

This is to inform you that the Cultural Club is organizing a quiz competition on Dr. Ambedkar. The quiz will take place in the Auditorium on July 6th from 8 to 10 am. If you're interested in participating give your name to your class teacher before July 3rd.

Campaigning politicians never use incendiary speech to excite crowd in accordance with the Supreme free speech Court's ruling on corporate political advertisements. This statement is True.

Political campaign funding is an acceptable form of free speech. Detractors assert that the Republican National Committee permits limitless free expression by accepting campaign funds.

Contributions would promote corruption and cause candidates to place a greater emphasis on attracting a small number of rich voters who would help them raise money for their campaigns than on serving the general public. Others contend that restrictions on contributions compromise the right to free speech because they can be used to pay for many forms of speech, such as pamphlets, billboards, television commercials.

To know more about Free speech visit:

https://brainly.com/question/31807211

#SPJ4

An inference that can be made about Dr. Mesmer is that he is more interested in making a profit than in helping the sick.

Throughout the book, it becomes clear that Dr. Mesmer was primarily motivated by financial gain and prestige rather than a desire to help his patients. He charged exorbitant fees for his treatments and often made grandiose claims about their effectiveness without providing any scientific evidence to back them up. Furthermore, when his methods were challenged by other doctors and scientists, he became defensive and refused to engage in open debate or respond to criticism in a constructive way.

While it's true that Dr. Mesmer did have some supporters who believed in the validity of his work, it seems clear that his primary motivation was not to improve the health and well-being of others but rather to advance his own reputation and financial interests.

learn more about Dr. Mesmer here

https://brainly.com/question/13293639

#SPJ11

Answer:

Can you see her breathing??

Answer:

shes dead

Explanation:

The comparison between Creon's decision and how Oedipus governed is that if it was Oedipus he would have acted in a harsh and thoughtless manner.

Both of them have two different personalities. Creon is a very thoughtful and wise person. But Oedipus on the other hand is his opposite.

Even with the accusations that Oedipus faced, Creon still tried to stop the public display of shame and said he would only take action on him if it was approved by the Gods.

Oedipus would have acted in a completely different way if he was the one to make this decision.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/17767752?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

D. Crime backfires on a criminal

Explanation:

I got the answer right on my test!

In response to the comprehension questions;

A. "Nowhere as absolute as the grave." can be interpreted as;

B. Those who are wounded in the war will become "prisoners in a fortress of falling walls."

C. What the author meant by "the shattered shall become prisoners in a fortress of falling walls," was that the war has caused immeasurable losses for victims without hopes of getting justices although they continue to yawn for it. Therefore they remain trapped in the fortress of falling walls.

D. The author says that we are casualties of war because whether or not we were present when the war happened, we are still experiencing the effect of the war politically, socially, economically, and psychologically.

The comprehension questions are from the poem "The Casualties" by John P. Clark. The poem speaks about the war and the post war repercussion for Nigerians.

See more comprehension questions here:

https://brainly.com/question/24217588

#SPJ1

Autoimmune diseases are rising despite the fact that humans should have exceptionally high immune systems. This can be explained by the fact that sexual selection is at play, leading to a reduction in immune function.

The excerpt explains the correlation between women's preference for symmetry and their fertile phase of their cycle. It is observed that women tend to prefer the scent of symmetrical men as their fertility increases. This indicates that women use scent as a factor in determining mating partners, which is an example of sexual selection.Sexual selection is a special type of natural selection in which individuals with certain traits are more likely than others to obtain mates.

This leads to traits that improve an individual's ability to secure a mate being favored, while traits that do not aid in mate selection are not favored.As a result, it is suggested that sexual selection may have favored traits that lower immune function in order to signal traits related to mate quality. This could explain the rising incidence of autoimmune diseases despite the fact that humans should have exceptionally high immune systems.

To know more about  Autoimmune diseases visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14766876

#SPJ11

Yes, the argument is valid. The conclusion logically follows from the premises given.

Premise 1 states that either Amy joins the army or Mary joins the Marines. Premise 2 states that it is not the case that Mary joins the marines. From these two premises, it can be concluded that Amy must join the army.

This is a valid argument because the conclusion necessarily follows from the premises. It is impossible for the premises to be true and the conclusion to be false. This type of argument is known as a disjunctive syllogism, where a statement is made between two options and one option is eliminated, leaving the other as the only possible conclusion.

In this case, the argument is valid because it follows the structure of a disjunctive syllogism and the conclusion logically follows from the given premises.

Know more about Marines here:

https://brainly.com/question/13487811

#SPJ11

The problem in this ineffective selection is a misplaced modifier.

A misplaced modifier is a type of grammatical error that occurs when a modifier (such as an adverb or an adjective) is placed too far away from the word it is supposed to modify, leading to confusion or ambiguity in the sentence's meaning.

In the given sentence, the modifier "in preparation for Bill Gates's visit at 1:00 p.m." is misplaced because it seems to modify "washing the windows tomorrow" instead of the intended meaning of removing items from the sills. This can create confusion for the reader or listener.

Learn more about misplaced modifier

brainly.com/question/30282683

#SPJ11

Answer:

Matt Keeslar

Explanation:

pls mark as brainliest! :D