Answer:
$0.78 i think
Explanation:
Answer:
12.235
Explanation:
BECAUSE
vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to winnie. winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. winnie has
Vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to Winnie. Winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. Winnie has disaffirmed the contract. The correct answer is c.
Winnie's continued use of the laptop after turning 18, as opposed to an implied or express ratification, shows a disaffirmation of the agreement. The act of a minor voiding or rejecting a contract they signed before turning 18 is known as disaffirmation.
Winnie is essentially indicating their intention not to be bound by the terms of the contract by using the laptop without taking any explicit action to affirm or accept it. This is a common legal safeguard for minors to make sure they aren't unduly burdened by contracts they signed while lacking the mental capacity to fully comprehend the implications.
Learn more about contract at:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
The complete question is "Vijay enters into a contract to sell his laptop to Winnie. Winnie takes possession of the laptop as a minor and continues to use it well after reaching the age of majority. Winnie has a. expressly ratified the contract. b. impliedly ratified the contract. c. disaffirmed the contract. d. none of the choices.
1. What are at least two key distinctions between a developed and a developing nation that the
table suggests? What is a key distinction between the United States and both other nations? (2
points)
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
You did not give the table but here are some differences between a developed nation and a developing nation.
First and foremost, we should note that a developed country is one that is highly industrialized, has a high GDP and has a high per capital income while a developing nation is one that has low industrialization, low GDP and low per capita income.
Secondly, a developed nation typically has a low unemployment rate while a developing nation has a high unemployment rate.
Thirdly, a developed nation has a low birth rate and a low infant mortality rate while a developing nation has a high birth rate and a high infant mortality rate.
Furthermore, a developed nation has a high standard of living and good infrastructural facilities such as good road network, constant power supply etc while a developing nation has a low standard of living and poor infrastructural facilities.
Lastly, the resources of a developed nation are effectively and efficiently used while a developing nation mismanages its resources.
1.
Bentham and Kant agree on?
Answer:
Morality constrains individual self-interest
Explanation:
both authors believe that morality puts limits on what any given individual may do in the pursuit of his or self-interest. For example: Kant argues that one should never make a lying promise, even if is one's interest to do so; Bentham argues that one shoukd maximise everyone's aggregate pleasure minus pain, not only one's own.
voters in north carolina approve a new state constitution, after which the ocean city council passes new ordinances, the north carolina department of parks and recreation issues new rules, and the ocean city chamber of commerce sends out new instruction. sources of law do not include
Answer:
Explanation:
Sources of law do not include instructions from the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce. While the Chamber of Commerce can provide guidance and recommendations to its members and the community, it does not have the legal authority to create or enforce laws.
The sources of law in this scenario include:
The new state constitution approved by voters in North Carolina. This is a fundamental source of law that establishes the framework for government and the legal system.
The new ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council. These are local laws that are created and enforced by the city government.
The new rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation. These are administrative regulations that are created by government agencies to implement and enforce laws and policies.
Overall, sources of law include constitutional provisions, statutory law, administrative law, and common law, which are created through court decisions. Instructions or guidance from private entities such as the Chamber of Commerce do not hold the force of law.
Yes, voters in North Carolina approved a new state constitution.
This new constitution affects many aspects of law, including ordinances passed by the Ocean City Council, rules issued by the North Carolina Department of Parks and Recreation, and instructions sent out by the Ocean City Chamber of Commerce.
Sources of law do not include the new state constitution, ordinances, rules, and instructions mentioned above, but rather come from the U.S. Constitution, state laws, state court decisions, and federal laws and regulations.
These sources are all recognized as legitimate forms of law and can be used to help interpret and make decisions.
To know more about federal laws click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14867447#
#SPJ11
Sebastian is skateboarding outside the local rec center. On the sidewalk, he finds a wallet that someone has dropped. Sebastian does not see anyone around, and the wallet does not contain an ID, so he takes the wallet inside the recreation center to give to the desk. He hopes that the owner will come looking for it. What are Sebastian’s actions an example of? A. crime B. folkway C. more D. law
Answer:
law i think
Explanation:
if not its more
firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act violates public policy.
True
False
Firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act violates public policy is true. It is generally an illegal act to fire a worker for refusing to commit an illegal act.
To keep things in order, both the employer and the employee must comply with the law and act in accordance with it. A worker who refuses to perform an illegal act may not be lawfully discharged. Similarly, the employee must be sure that the act he or she is refusing to do is truly illegal before refusing to do it. As a result, the employee is usually legally protected, and the firing may be deemed wrongful termination. In general, workers who refuse to perform illegal or unethical acts are protected by whistleblowing laws and are protected from retaliation by their employers. In most cases, whistleblowers are people who have inside information about fraud or other misconduct that is being carried out by their employers. Whistleblowers must go through the appropriate channels to report the misconduct, and they must be protected from retaliation. Many laws have been passed to protect whistleblowers, but there is still a lot of work to be done to ensure that they are not punished for doing the right thing. Firing a worker who refuses to perform an illegal act is not only wrong but also illegal. Employers must be aware of the laws in their jurisdiction and must follow them. It is illegal to fire an employee who refuses to commit an illegal act. Such a termination of employment is usually regarded as wrongful termination, and employees who have been fired for this reason may be able to take legal action against their former employers. It is critical for both the employer and the employee to be aware of the law and to act in accordance with it.
to know more about termination visit:
brainly.com/question/11848544
#SPJ11
Do you think it is possible to find a balance between justice and the implementation of Ubuntu and it’s inherent ideas rehabilitative justice
Answer:
Yes
Explanation:
Ubuntu is the long tradition of african cultures where criminals or people that have done something wrong have to do right by the people they injured or hurt, and they have to help them healing the social tissue and restoring relationships in order to be able to go back into society.
It's a very close matter to rehabilitative justice, in the sense of wanting to restore the social tissue and helping the person get back to society as a good, productive and healthy member of the society, Ubuntu has proven to be a good method and state of mind when dealing with hurt societies by the narcotrafic and organized crime.
what is the difference between an executive order and a law?
The manner in which a law is implemented distinguishes it from an executive order.
Either the President of the United States or the Governor of a state may issue an executive order. The President's directives are related to how the federal government is run. They are frequently employed by governors in issues involving public health.
An executive order has legal standing, thus breaking it could have repercussions. Also, executive orders are often issued considerably more quickly than laws. Unlike presidential orders, which cannot be revoked by Congress, laws must be approved by Congress.
Additionally, they are both well-documented and formally recorded. The Code of Federal Regulation, the official compilation of all federal rules and regulations, governs both presidential executive orders and federal statutes.
To know more about "executive order" visit-
brainly.com/question/18973126
#SPJ4
In University and Community College System of Nevada v. Farmer, Chief Justice Steffen references "strict scrutiny" of judicial review of affirmative action cases by a government employer. Strict scrutiny is best categorized as:
There is a (1) compelling interest for the law/policy and (2) a rational basis for the law/policy to address the compelling interest.
There is a (1) letigmiate government interest for the law/policy and (2) the law/poicy is rationally related to this interest.
There is (1) an important government objective for the law/policy and (2) the law/policy is substantially related to achieving this objective.
There is (1) a compelling government interest for the law/policy and (2) the law/policy is narrowly tailored to achieve this result.
Strict scrutiny is best categorized as There is (1) a compelling government interest for the law/policy and (2) the law/policy is narrowly tailored to achieve this result.
A standard known as "strict scrutiny" is used in judicial review to determine whether a law or policy could potentially violate fundamental rights or involve dubious classifications like race or religion. It calls for the government to show two essential components-
(1) a compelling government interest, which indicates that the goal is of the utmost importance and (2) the law or policy is narrowly tailored which indicates that it is specifically created to achieve the desired result without unduly restricting or interfering with individuals rights. The government must provide a strong justification for any law or policy that is the subject of strict scrutiny analysis at this level of scrutiny which is the most rigorous.
Learn more about Strict scrutiny at:
brainly.com/question/27458017
#SPJ4
Which of the following events from World War II is an extreme illustration of the Principal-Agent Problem?
O The invasion of Pearl Harbor
The loss of the U.S.S. Indianapolis
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan
O The Nazi establishment of concentration camps
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort
Answer:
Hitler's leadership of the Third Reich's war effort.
Explanation:
By definition, a party (agent) agrees to work in favor of another (principle) in return for some incentive.
does chase freedom unlimited have foreign transaction fees?
Answer:
Explanation:
No, Chase Freedom Unlimited does not have foreign transaction fees. This means that you can use your card for purchases outside the United States without incurring any additional fees. However, keep in mind that foreign merchants may charge a fee for using a credit card, which is separate from any fees charged by the card issuer. It is always a good idea to check with the merchant and your credit card issuer about any fees before making a purchase.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
An important law in the protection of civil rights is the Civil Rights Act of 1871. This act has been amended a number of times since 1871, and it is now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For this reason, claims brought under the statute are known as § 1983 actions.
The Civil Rights Act of 1871 was enacted to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. That amendment provides, in part, that states shall not "make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny any person within its jurisdiction equal protection of the laws." The Fourteenth Amendment resulted from the Civil War. The Civil Rights Act resulted from the need to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment. The statute’s goal is to prevent states from violating the Fourteenth Amendment and to provide plaintiffs with compensation for violations of civil rights.
May the United States, its various states, or local governments be sued under § 1983? May officials of the United States, states, or local governments be sued individually under § 1983?
Need just a few sentences in simple terms! Just yes/no and simple why explanation!
Yes, both the United States, its various states, or local governments can be sued under § 1983, while officials of the United States, states, or local governments can be sued individually under § 1983.
This act has been amended a number of times since 1871, and it is now codified as 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For this reason, claims brought under the statute are known as § 1983 actions.
to know more about states visit
https://brainly.com/question/33633166
#SPJ11
The scope of the authority and power held by an agency is called _____.
jurisdiction
police discretion
sphere of influence
pleasure to serve
Answer:
police discretion because that's the one that makes more sense
Answer:
police discretion
Explanation:
took the quiz and got it correct
which are torts rather than crimes? select all that apply.
A crime is defined as an unlawful conduct that has an impact on the entire social structure of our communities, whereas a tort is something that is classified as wrongdoing against an individual.
A tort is a civil wrong for which a person is legally responsible. A tort is an act or omission that causes harm to another person. When referring to torts, the terms "injury" and "harm" refer to the violation of a person's legal rights, respectively, and the actual loss or harm that person really experiences. Legal jargon frequently causes misunderstandings in general. Crime and tort are two of them. They are occasionally used interchangeably, but that is not how things actually work. Both phrases are entirely distinct from one another. Each of them has unique characteristics and effects. Understanding the actual meaning of these legal terminology is crucial for a comprehensive understanding of the legal system. In this piece, we'll examine the definitions of crime and tort as well as how they differ from one another.
Learn more about to tort visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/14614720
#SPJ4
WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST
1. Which of the following documents would an individual involved in a traffic accident
complete?
A. Insurance claims
B. Police reports
C. Fault documentation
D. Driver's crash report
Answer:
It's important to contact the police any time you're involved in a car accident. ... This will work to your benefit if there is a lawsuit filed following the accident. ... it is still important to make sure an accident report is filed to document exactly what ... Man hand on Mobile radio in his car. Is Your Police Report Complete?
Explanation:
An individual will be listed in the Driver's crash report. Therefore, option (D) is the proper choice.
What are the steps for road safety?
Road traffic safety refers to the methods and measures used to prevent death or serious harm to users of the roads. Vehicles, cyclists, pedestrians, horseback riders, and those utilizing on-road public transportation are examples of common road users.
Accidents most frequently occur as a result of a road user's carelessness or lack of awareness about road safety. Therefore, learning about road safety is just as crucial to survival as studying other fundamentals.
Road safety measures include using seatbelts and helmets, only crossing at zebra crossings, walking carefully on sidewalks, paying attention to speed limits, and never drinking and driving.
Hence, option (D) is accurate.
Learn more about road safety measures, from:
brainly.com/question/23563058
#SPJ2
For DASA, the widely-accepted definition of bullying was expanded to include: Choose only ONE best answer.
a single incident, not just a series of incidents.
acts of aggression intended to cause harm.
acts by a person operating from a position of strength or power.
physical or verbal acts that are repeated over a period of time
For DASA, the widely-accepted definition of bullying was expanded to include physical or verbal acts that are repeated over a period of time.
DASA (Dignity for All Students Act) is a New York State law that addresses the issue of bullying in schools. It aims to create a safe and supportive environment for students by prohibiting harassment and discrimination based on various characteristics. When it comes to defining bullying, DASA expanded the widely-accepted definition to include physical or verbal acts that are repeated over a period of time.
This definition emphasizes the repetitive nature of bullying, acknowledging that it is not just a one-time incident but a pattern of behavior that occurs over an extended period. It recognizes that bullying can manifest in various forms, such as physical aggression, verbal insults, social exclusion, or cyberbullying. The repetition of these acts is a key element because it distinguishes bullying from isolated conflicts or disagreements.
By including the requirement of repetition, DASA acknowledges that bullying has a significant impact on the victim's well-being and creates a hostile environment. It allows school administrators and educators to identify and address persistent bullying behavior, providing support to the victims and taking appropriate disciplinary actions against the perpetrators.
This expanded definition helps to create a comprehensive understanding of bullying, enabling schools to effectively address and prevent this harmful behavior while fostering a positive and inclusive learning environment.
Know more about bullying here:
https://brainly.com/question/32060545
#SPJ8
You are a contract manager for ABC Construction Co. ABC receives an invitation from John, a landowner, to submit a bid for building a new skyscraper on his property. You reply to the invitation and submit your best terms which you believe delivers higher quality at a lower price than your competitors. That same day, you receive an email from Zappo Electrical Inc. offering to support an ABC construction project for $20,000. Zappo states, "I'm sure we can provide you the best service. If I don't hear from you in three days that means you want to work with us." You do not reply to the email, and three days later Zappo emails again, "Glad we have a contract and I look forward to working with you shortly." Does ABC have a contract with John or Zappo Electrical Inc.? Explain your answer.
Answer:
neither unless Jhon excepted the bid. and the answere is we do not have a contract, and if they sue then counter sue them and defende yourself with a lawyer/ lawyers
All federal statutory laws are part of the
A. United States Code
B. state constitutions
C. U.S. Constitution
D. regulatory agencies
SUBMIT
Thời kì nào chưa có nhà nước
c. In a criminal case, should a lawyer defend a client he or she knows is guilty? Would you defend someone you knew was guilty? Explain.
Answer: lawyers have a legal responsibility to their clients that they must uphold. This means if the lawyer knows the client is guilty, they must still defend them. That’s there job.
Explanation: The job of a criminal defense lawyer is to defend you against the charges that are presented, know matter what.
What is a contract that has been concluded as a result of undue influence
Explanation:
A contract is said to be induced by 'undue influence' where the relations subsisting between the parties are such that one of the parties is in a position to dominate the will of the other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage over the other.
On what ground, does Thomas Hobbes prefer a country contract an absolute monarch as the best ruler? [7 marks]
Thomas Hobbes' ideas about hiring an absolute monarch as the best ruler come from his ideas based on absolutism, as the governmental system capable of promoting social order.
Thomas HobbesHe was an English philosopher born in 1588, whose central ideas were based on absolutism and the divine right of kings. He developed the concept of Social Contract, a theory that defines the abstention of the rights of natural human freedom in favor of the order and social security provided by the State.
As his main work, he published the book The Leviathan, which promoted absolutism and authoritarianism as the only way to promote order and the maintenance of society.
Find out more information about Hobbes here:
https://brainly.com/question/907163
a person trained in conflict resolution is considered: a. an arbitrator. b. a mediator. c. a negotiator. d. a judge.
A person trained in conflict resolution is considered a mediator. Option B is the correct answer.
The mediator works with the parties to help them reach their own settlement. The mediator does not make the final decision; instead, they assist the parties in identifying and concentrating on the crucial problems that must be resolved. Option B is the correct answer.
The mediator's securities knowledge aids in elucidating the problems and determining the advantages and disadvantages of each party's position. The mediator maintains an objective viewpoint while providing original ideas and creative techniques. The tasks of a mediator are:
to mediate a case in a fair and impartial manner;if the mediator is unable to act impartially, to refuse or resign from a mediation;During and after a mediation, a conflict of interest, or the appearance of a conflict of interest, should be avoided;Learn more about Conflict here:
https://brainly.com/question/26083560
#SPJ4
A person trained in conflict resolution could be considered, depending on their role and the context, as either an arbitrator, a mediator, or a negotiator. Arbitrators, mediators, and negotiators each have distinct roles in the resolution of conflicts.
Explanation:A person trained in conflict resolution could be considered, depending on their role in the situation, as either an arbitrator, a mediator or a negotiator.
An arbitrator is essentially a decision-maker, often used in contract disputes or other legal issues where both sides have agreed to accept the arbitrator's decision as final. A mediator, on the other hand, doesn't make the decision but attempts to help the parties to the conflict reach their own agreement. A negotiator typically represents one of the parties involved in the conflict and tries to get the best possible outcome for their side.
In some cases, a judge, who is a professional appointed to judge and conduct court proceedings, can also play a role in conflict resolution as part of the judicial system or judicial branch. However, in this context, option d. a judge may not be the most suitable answer.
Learn more about Conflict Resolution here:https://brainly.com/question/31558006
#SPJ11
should law makers have a moral agenda?
Answer:
Law should only reflect moral values if a person can harm others. ... This is regarded as a liberal approach between law and morality, in otherwords the state should not make any laws against an individual unless it will cause harm to another.
A person may legally ride in the back of a pickup truck when: The sides of the pickup bed are at least 24 inches high. The back of the pickup is covered with a camper shell. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Answer:
C. In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
Explanation:
Pick up trucks are manufactured for the purpose of transporting goods or other equipment but not for the transportation of humans. While riding at the back of a pickup truck can seem enticing, if appropriate measures are not considered, then there would likely be an accident for the driver might take a sharp turn which could cause the passengers behind harm.
One of the laws for riding in the back of a pickup truck is possessing a federally-approved restraint system which protects the rider in the bed of the truck. So, the rider should seat in a secured seat with an approved safety seat belt to keep him protected in the event of a crash.
Legally speaking, a person can only ride in the back of a pickup truck when In a secured seat and while using an approved safety belt.
When can a person ride in a pickup?The back of a pickup truck is open and can lead to someone falling off if they aren't careful.
For this reason, the law demands that the back should have a secured seat which has a seatbelt that is approved by the relevant authority. If this isn't the case then no one should sit in the back.
Find out more on driving regulations at https://brainly.com/question/11291892.
Which of these resulted from the exonerations of the separate wrongful 1986 convictions of Timothy Cole and Michael Morton?A state-level advisory panel recommended reforms.A prosecuting attorney was criminally convicted for actions leading to wrongful conviction.Compensation was increased for wrongfully convicted and imprisoned individuals.Information collected by prosecutors in discovery must be made available to the defense.
A prosecuting attorney was criminally convicted for actions leading to wrongful conviction resulted from the exonerations of the separate wrongful 1986 convictions of Timothy Cole and Michael Morton .
Reforms were advised by a state-level advisory body. For those who were unfairly convicted and imprisoned, compensation was increased. Texas has had the most false convictions in the country, according to the National Registry of Exonerations. This is caused by a variety of causes, including an over reliance on eyewitness testimony and excessively zealous prosecutors.
One of the main causes of erroneous convictions is incorrect eyewitness identification. In fact, according to the Innocence Project, it was a factor in around 70% of convictions that were subsequently acquitted using DNA evidence.
To know more about National Registry of Exonerations visit :
https://brainly.com/question/28213945
#SPJ4
what are the essential requisites of an obligation give example
An active subject, who has the power to demand the prestation, known as the creditor or oblige , A passive subject, who is bound to perform the prestation, known as debtor or obligor.
Examples of Obligations?If a person consistently misses their car payments, the automaker will seize and reclaim the vehicle.An obligation is a legal need to give, to perform, or not to do anything. Taxes are a type of duty, and failing to pay them results in steep fines or jail. 1. For an obligation to have legal force, it must be of a juridical type. Through this, the fulfilment of an obligation may be ordered by the court. An obligation can be natural or civil.
To learn more about Obligations refer:
https://brainly.ph/question/4063243
#SPJ9
Select the correct answer.
According to routine activity theory, which is a possible reason for internet fraud?
O A. increasingly motivated offenders
OB. easily available suitable targets
O C. lack of capable guardians
OD. people with no internet access
Answer:
Im not sure if this is right but i thnk its (B) Available Suitable Targets
Explanation:
100 POINTS!!
Which amendment protects citizens from having their private property taken by the government?
the Fourth Amendent
the Third Amendment
the First Amendment
the Second Amendment
Answer:
fourth ammendment protects citizens from that
The amendment that protects citizens from having their private property taken by the government is the Fourth Amendment. Thus, option (a) is correct.
The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which is a component of the Bill of Rights, forbids arbitrary searches and seizures. It establishes standards for the issuance of warrants, which must be authorized by a judge or magistrate, supported by oath or affirmation, and supported by probable cause.
The Fourth Amendment safeguards citizens against illegal government searches and seizures, but only those that fall under the legal definition of being unreasonable are covered.
Learn more about on amendment, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13276616
#SPJ2
Which restriction does the U.S. government place on personal freedoms?
A. Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
B. Personal freedoms must serve the U.S. government.
C. Personal freedoms can cause harm only to people in the minority.
D. Personal freedoms must contribute to the common good.
Answer:
A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Explanation:
Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.
the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All
Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.
The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.
When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?
The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.
But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.
Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.
That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.
- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.