Answers
Courts utilize strict scrutiny as a type of judicial review to assess whether specific legislation is constitutional. When a plaintiff accuses the government of discrimination, the courts frequently use strict scrutiny.
What part of the Constitution protects against discrimination?The 14th Amendment, which ensures "equal protection of the laws," has been interpreted by a strong majority of the U.S. Supreme Court to include safeguards against sex discrimination. This is first seen in the 1971 landmark decision Reed v.
No state shall enact or carry out any legislation that restricts the rights or privileges of US citizens; no state shall rob anybody of their life, liberty, or property without due process of law; and no state shall refuse to any person within its borders the equal protection of the laws.
Learn more about Discrimination By Law here:
https://brainly.com/question/14896067
#SPJ1
Related Questions
Select the correct answer.
Who can propose an amendment to the Constitution?
A a simple majority of Congress
B. the president
с.
the Supreme Court
D.
a two-thirds majority of Congress
Answers
Answer:
d
Explanation:
a two-thirds majority of Congress
law passed to prohibit the sale of mislabeled or expired foods, medicines, and cosmetics
Answers
The law passed to prohibit the sale of mislabeled or expired foods, medicines, and cosmetics is called the "Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act" (FD&C Act) of 1938.
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act" (FD&C Act) of 1938: This act aims to ensure the safety, efficacy, and proper labeling of these products. Here's a step-by-step explanation of the FD&C Act:
1. The FD&C Act was enacted in response to concerns about the safety and quality of products in the market.
2. The act provides the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with the authority to regulate and oversee the manufacturing, sale, and distribution of foods, drugs, and cosmetics.
3. Under the FD&C Act, it is illegal to sell misbranded or adulterated products, which include expired, contaminated, or improperly labeled items.
4. The act requires that all foods, medicines, and cosmetics be properly labeled with accurate and complete information, including ingredients, manufacturing dates, and expiration dates.
5. The FDA conducts inspections and enforces compliance with the FD&C Act, taking appropriate action against manufacturers or sellers who violate its provisions.
6. Penalties for violating the FD&C Act can include fines, product seizures, and even imprisonment, depending on the severity of the violation.
In summary, the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938 was passed to prohibit the sale of mislabeled or expired foods, medicines, and cosmetics. It aims to protect consumers by ensuring that these products are safe, effective, and accurately labeled.
Know more about the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act" (FD&C Act) here:
https://brainly.com/question/12424626
#SPJ11
2.1. Name and explain the purpose of one law/legislation that protects citizens
against the specific gender based violence
Answers
Answer:
Uniform
Explanation:
Growing up, we have all been taught the stereotypical clothing each person should wear. E.G, a few weeks ago in my English class we were having a debate about how till this day, most girls choose to wear skirts, even if there is the option of trousers. I just think that this is something that has grown with us, and i guess people will still be judgemental in the future elsewhere.
Strickland attempted to bribe Judge Sylvania Woods to show leniency toward one of Strickland's friends who had a case pending before the judge. Judge Woods immediately reported this to the state's attorney and was asked to play along with Strickland until the actual payment of money occurred. Strickland gave $2,500 to the judge, who promptly turned it over to the state's attorney's office. Strickland was indicted for bribery, pled guilty, and was sentenced to a four-year prison term. Three months after the criminal trial, Strickland filed a motion for the return of his $2,500. Will the court order the return of his money
Answers
Answer:
No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.
Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.
Explanation:
1. what does the immigration Law consist of?
2. How does it help people that have no papers?
3. how have the immigration laws changed over the year to help more people who are undocumented?
4.How do immigration laws differ among different states?
5.Why do immigration cases keep rising even when most countries are adopting democracy?
6.What is the relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise?
7.How much are the systems of taxation for the immigrants in the United States fair?
Answers
Immigration law consists of rules and regulations that govern the admission, residency, and deportation of non-citizens in the United States. It sets the criteria and processes for people who want to enter the country, work, study, or seek asylum.The relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise is complex, as different states may have varying degrees of enforcement and legislation. Stricter laws may deter some immigrants from entering, while lenient policies might encourage more immigration. It's important for a democracy to balance these laws with fairness and human rights considerations.The taxation system for immigrants in the United States can be considered fair in some aspects. Both documented and undocumented immigrants pay taxes through various means, such as property, sales, and income taxes. However, undocumented immigrants may not benefit from some public services they contribute to through taxation, raising questions about fairness and equity.
1. Immigration Law consists of a set of rules and regulations that govern the entry, residence, and employment of foreign nationals in the United States. The law is designed to protect American citizens and maintain the country's security while also ensuring that individuals who seek to immigrate to the United States have a fair opportunity to do so.
6. The relationship between immigration laws and the rate of their rise is complex. Some argue that strict immigration laws can discourage individuals from attempting to enter the country illegally, thereby reducing the rate of illegal immigration. However, others argue that overly harsh immigration policies can exacerbate the problem by driving undocumented immigrants further underground and making it more difficult for them to integrate into American society.
7. The systems of taxation for immigrants in the United States are generally considered fair. Undocumented immigrants are required to pay taxes just like any other worker, and many also contribute to the economy through their consumption of goods and services. However, some argue that the tax system could be made more equitable by providing a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants, which would allow them to fully participate in American society and enjoy the same rights and privileges as other citizens. Ultimately, the question of taxation for immigrants is a complex one that requires careful consideration of the many competing interests involved.
To know more about immigration visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29998020
#SPJ11
When a commercial real estate sale has two Agent sales associates the broker may create a?
Answers
When a commercial real estate sale involves two agent sales associates working under a broker, the broker may create a co-brokerage agreement or a dual agency arrangement.
A co-brokerage agreement is a contractual agreement between two real estate brokers, each representing different parties involved in a transaction. In this case, the broker representing the seller and the broker representing the buyer collaborate to facilitate the sale. The agreement outlines the responsibilities, duties, and compensation arrangement between the two brokers.
Under a co-brokerage agreement, the brokers typically share information, work together to market the property, coordinate showings, negotiate terms, and assist in the closing process. The agreement specifies how the commission will be divided between the brokers, typically based on a predetermined percentage or a negotiated split.
On the other hand, a dual agency arrangement occurs when the broker represents both the buyer and the seller in a transaction. In this scenario, the broker acts as a neutral intermediary, facilitating the transaction while maintaining impartiality.
know more about intermediary here:
https://brainly.com/question/29732040
#SPJ8
1. Means v. Clardy Case (Law Studies)
Do you agree with the court’s conclusion that Nancy Clardy did not ratify the note? Why or why not?
Answers
In the Means v. Clardy case, the court concluded that Nancy Clardy did not ratify the note.
The court's decision was based on several factors. First, Nancy Clardy did not sign the promissory note. Second, she did not receive any benefit from the loan proceeds. Third, she did not make any payments on the note. Finally, she did not know about the existence of the note until after her husband's death.
The court's conclusion that Nancy Clardy did not ratify the note appears to be reasonable and well-supported by the evidence. Ratification is a legal principle that allows a person to be bound by a contract or other legal obligation that was initially entered into by someone else. In order for ratification to occur, the person must have knowledge of the transaction and must either accept the benefits of the transaction or act in a way that suggests approval or agreement. In the Means v. Clardy case, the court found that Nancy Clardy did not sign the promissory note and did not receive any benefit from the loan proceeds. These two factors alone suggest that she did not intend to be bound by the note. Additionally, the fact that she did not make any payments on the note further supports the conclusion that she did not intend to ratify it. Moreover, the court noted that Nancy Clardy did not know about the existence of the note until after her husband's death. This is significant because it suggests that she did not have the opportunity to approve or disapprove of the transaction before it took place. If she had known about the note and had not objected to it, that might have been seen as evidence of ratification. However, in this case, she had no knowledge of the note and therefore could not have ratified it.
To know more about clardy visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30734447
#SPJ11
The Rule against Perpetuities is a common law restriction against creating interests that would vest at uncertain times or too far in the future. True False
Answers
The Statement "The Rule against Perpetuities is a common law restriction against creating interests that would vest at uncertain times or too far in the future" is True.
The Rule against Perpetuities is indeed a common law restriction that prohibits the creation of future interests in property that would vest or take effect too remotely in the future. The rule aims to prevent the tying up of property for an excessive duration and to promote marketability and certainty in property transactions.
The rule is based on the principle that property should not be tied up or held in a state of uncertainty indefinitely. It seeks to balance the interests of property owners who want to control the disposition of their assets and the broader public policy goal of promoting the free transferability and effective use of property.
So, the given statement is True.
Learn more about Perpetuities
https://brainly.com/question/28590130
#SPJ11
is a complaint in a divorce action required to be verified?
Answers
Yes, complaints in a divorce action must be verified by affidavit. Depending on the jurisdiction, several conditions may apply for a validated complaint in a divorce proceeding. Verification of a divorce complaint may be necessary in some states but not in others.
Verification is the act of attesting to the veracity of a document by signing it while under oath. When submitting a verified complaint in a divorce case, the plaintiff may be required to swear under oath that all allegations made in the complaint are truthful and accurate to the best of their knowledge.
As a result, if you're thinking about starting the divorce process, you should speak with a family law expert in your area to learn more about the procedures for submitting a complaint and whether or not it needs to be confirmed.
For such more question on divorce:
https://brainly.com/question/13405903
#SPJ11
Applying the job characteristics Model, how motivating are Uber’s jobs for drivers?
Answers
Uber's jobs for drivers can be moderately motivating based on the Job Characteristics Model. Factors like skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback contribute to the overall motivation level, although individual experiences may vary.
Applying the Job Characteristics Model (JCM) to Uber's jobs for drivers, the motivation level can vary for different individuals. The JCM proposes that motivation is influenced by five core job characteristics: skill variety, task identity, task significance, autonomy, and feedback. Uber's jobs for drivers generally exhibit some degree of skill variety as drivers perform various tasks like navigation and customer service. Task identity may be moderate, as drivers have a clear role in transporting passengers. Task significance can also be meaningful, as drivers contribute to the transportation needs of individuals. Autonomy is relatively high, as drivers have flexibility in choosing their working hours and locations. Feedback can vary depending on passenger ratings and reviews.Overall, Uber's jobs for drivers can provide a moderate level of motivation, with autonomy being a key factor. However, individual drivers' experiences and perceptions may influence the degree of motivation they derive from the job.
For more questions on Job Characteristics Model:
https://brainly.com/question/17228938
#SPJ8
one of the leading formative influences on the staff culture of corrections officers is the
Answers
One of the leading formative influences on the staff culture of corrections officers is the institutional culture of the correctional facility.
This includes the policies, procedures, and values that are established by the administration and reinforced by the staff. The nature of the work itself, including the inherent stress and danger of working in a prison or jail, also contributes to the development of a unique culture among corrections officers. This culture can be both supportive and insular, with a strong emphasis on loyalty and solidarity among staff members. Additionally, the history and legacy of the corrections system, as well as the broader social and political context in which it operates, can also shape the attitudes and behaviors of corrections officers. It is important for administrators to recognize and understand these influences in order to effectively manage and support their staff.
To learn more about culture, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30327560
#SPJ11
the law of universal gravitation states that any two objects in the universe:
Answers
The law of universal gravitation states that any two objects in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
The law of universal gravitation states that any two objects in the universe attract each other with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This law, first formulated by Sir Isaac Newton, is one of the most important discoveries in physics and has been used to explain a wide range of phenomena, from the orbits of planets around the sun to the behavior of subatomic particles. The law of universal gravitation is expressed mathematically as F=G(m1m2)/r², where F is the force of attraction between two objects, G is the gravitational constant, m1, and m2 are the masses of the two objects, and r is the distance between them. The value of G is approximately 6.67 x 10-11 N(m/kg)². The law of universal gravitation applies to all objects in the universe, regardless of their size or composition.
To know more about law of universal gravitation, visit
https://brainly.com/question/858421
#SPJ11
Which of the following is NOT true about the statute of frauds?
a.
The Statute of Frauds applies to real estate transactions.
b.
Two pieces of paper can be used together to make up the necessary writing.
c.
Both parties must sign the contract.
d.
A note or memorandum may be sufficient to satisfy the writing requirement.
Answers
The statement that is not true about the statute of frauds is d.A note or memorandum may be sufficient to satisfy the writing requirement.
What is Statute of Frauds?As implied by its name, the Statute of Frauds was established to stop deception in parties' oral agreements. Emails can occasionally fulfill the criteria for an enforceable contract. Certain contracts are subject to the Statute of Frauds, which lists the conditions under which it may be binding.
A statute of frauds is a type of law that mandates that specific agreements must be recorded in writing, signed by the party against whom they are to be enforced, and with enough detail to support the agreement.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Learn more about statute of frauds at:
https://brainly.com/question/29990570
#SPJ1
A man has been sentenced to prison for armed robbery, and admits guilt for the
deed. "But", he argues, "I'll never do anything of the kind again. I'm not insane or a
danger to society. I would be happier out of jail than in. My wife depends on me for
support and she and the children would be far happier if I were able to be the family
breadwinner again. As to the influence on others, almost no one would ever know
about it; you can keep the matter out of the newspapers and no one except you will
ever know that the crime was committed. Therefore, you should release me".
Assuming he is correct, what would you do?
Answers
Answer:
sentence him to 25 to life
Explanation:
laws are laws for a reason. a line in the sand is nothing if it is not enforce. this also leads to the old saying "if you can't do the time, then don't do the crime".
Việc xác định thuế suất thuế nhập khẩu do cơ quan hải quan quyết định.
Answers
HELPPPP pleaseeeeeee
Answers
I'm a little bit confused between a and b..
but I found this maybe it will help u..
Explanation:
The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within the home.
The District of Columbia argued that the opening phrase of the amendment, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,” known as the prefatory clause, limited the “right of the people” to have weapons only in connection with militia service. The city also pointed out that the law did not ban all guns, and that it was a reasonable way to prevent crime.
The Court agreed with Heller and overturned the District’s law. The Court reasoned that the prefatory clause gave one reason for the Second Amendment, but it did not limit the right listed in the operative clause—the second part of the amendment—to own weapons only for militia service. “The prefatory clause does not suggest that preserving the militia was the only reason Americans valued the ancient right…” The Court also reasoned that elsewhere in the Constitution, such as the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments, the phrase “the right of the people” is used only to refer to individual rights—that is, rights held by people as individuals. It is this phrasing that is used in the operative clause of the Second Amendment.
Finally, the Court reasoned that the right to own weapons for self-defense was an “inherent” (in-born) right of all people. “It has always been widely understood that the Second Amendment, like the First and Fourth Amendments, codified a pre-existing right. The very text of the Second Amendment implicitly recognizes the pre-existence of the right and declares only that it ‘shall not be infringed.’”
Therefore, the answer is A.
Pretend you are the world's leading expert in all things Critical Incident Management. Because of your expertise, you often consult with businesses about emergency preparedness. Create a document to summarize what an Executive Policy Group is as well as why a business should have one. For this exercise we will pretend you are presenting to a new Tech company, breaking into the social media world with a new platform. Company has 100 employees total. Your proposal for the business's EPG should be a page or more in length.
Answers
An Executive Policy Group (EPG) is a critical component of a business's overall emergency preparedness strategy, particularly for a tech company like yours, entering the competitive social media platform market. With a workforce of 100 employees, establishing an EPG helps to ensure your organization is well-prepared for any potential critical incidents.
An EPG is a team of senior executives and key decision-makers responsible for developing, implementing, and maintaining a comprehensive emergency response plan. This group ensures that the organization is well-equipped to handle critical incidents effectively and efficiently while minimizing potential impacts on operations, staff, and customers. Having an EPG is essential for several reasons. Firstly, it ensures a systematic and coordinated response to emergencies, enabling your company to react promptly and minimize potential damage. Secondly, it demonstrates a commitment to employee safety and security, fostering a positive work environment and attracting top talent. Thirdly, it safeguards the company's reputation and brand image by showing stakeholders that your organization takes crisis management seriously.
Learn more about Executive here:
https://brainly.com/question/31129751
#SPJ11
Must you have clear evidence to put away a criminal? Or can you have some evidence but not as valuable.
(What kind of evidence puts away a criminal)
Answers
Question 1
5 pts
The Rules of Evidence apply to
A)Criminal law cases only
B)Civil law cases only
C)Both civil and criminal law cases
Answers
Answer: A
Explanation:
Answer:
A.
Explanation:
thats just the answer
3 things that the Democratic party stands for today?
Answers
Answer:
Ideological social elements in the party include cultural liberalism, civil libertarianism, and feminism
Explanation:
Some Democratic social policies are immigration reform, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights. Some Democratic social policies are immigration reform, electoral reform, and women's reproductive rights.
the of the court also allows for higher courts to check bad decisions or incorrect rulings by lower courts. question 3 options: 1) criminal nature 2) adversarial nature 3) hierarchical nature 4) political nature
Answers
The hierarchical nature of the court system allows for higher courts to review and correct decisions made by lower courts. The correct option is 3.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits taxpayers to claim as an itemized deduction on their tax returns the interest paid on acquisition debt secured by a personal residence. The judicial system is referred to as having a hierarchical structure because higher courts have the authority to review and reverse decisions made by lower courts. The court system is typically divided into a number of levels, each with its own jurisdiction and authority. This includes the United States.
This hierarchical structure offers a mechanism for resolving mistakes or injustices that may happen at lower levels of the system as well as helps to ensure consistency and fairness in the application of the law. Additionally, it enables the formation of legal precedent, which may aid in directing subsequent choices and guaranteeing that the law is applied consistently over time. The correct option is 3.
Learn more about court system at:
brainly.com/question/3689905
#SPJ4
Which of these is an example of government corruption?
Answers
Answer:
Cronyism.
Explanation:
Answer:
cryonislism or however its spelt
Explanation:
The English law which first acknowledged the surpremacy of law over the ruler was the
Answers
Answer: The first Act of Supremacy was passed on 3 November 1534 (26 Hen. VIII c. 1) by the Parliament of England. It granted King Henry VIII of England and subsequent monarchs Royal Supremacy, such that he was declared the Supreme Head of the Church of England.
Explanation:
The Supreme Court has ruled that young peoples First Amendment rights may be limited
Answers
Answer:
True
Explanation:
which group led the charge of the change to incarceration instead of corporal punishment
Answers
Answer:
The prison population began to grow in the 1970s, when politicians from both parties used fear and thinly veiled racial rhetoric to push increasingly punitive policies.
Explanation:
Witch of the following its not considered proper tire maintenance
Answers
Answer:
include the answer choices.
What is the common term for a political party that exists that is not the Republicans or Democrats?
a
Outside Force
b
There is not such thing.
c
Third Party
d
Dealbreaker
Answers
Answer:
Third Party.
Explanation:
The other common term is 3rd party.
C). Third party
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
Answers
To measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy" it is to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity . Thus, option A is correct. Therefore, option A is correct.
Every time the federal government's expenditure outweighs tax receipts and other sources of money, a budget deficit results. The US Treasury distributes treasury bills, written notes, and bonds to cover the shortfall.
The sum of the annual budget deficits of the United States of America, less the infrequent surpluses to occur is known as the national debt. It serves as a gauge for the total amount of funding the federal government will require.
Learn more about deficit, here:
https://brainly.com/question/29602763
#SPJ1
The question is incomplete, Complete question probably will be is:
What does it mean to measure a government's deficit "relative to the size of the economy"?
to compare the size of the deficit to the productivity
to compare the size of the deficit to the unemployment rate
to measure the deficit as a percentage of the economy or GDP
to measure the deficit as a percentage of tax revenues
Why do you think a "reliable, scholarly
Source is always stressed in academic
writing?
Answers
What is habeas corpus please help due tommorrow
Answers
Answer:
Hi there! Answer is below :)
Explanation:
Habeas corpus was a law that was first introduced in Europe, to be more specific, Spain and Britain. This law gives an arrested person mandatory to appear before a judge and jury. It also requires the prosecutors to have evidence to make their point to jury.