In the British masacre did the soldiers commit murder or was it self defense?

We can fill in the blanks in comparison of the Senate/House of Representatives as follows:

The Senate is the upper chamber of the United States Congress, while the House of Representatives is the lower chamber.

Both together make up the national bicameral legislature of the United States.

Read more about bicameral legislature at brainly.com/question/2771114.

#SPJ1

The "We Shall Fight on the Beaches" speech was delivered by Winston Churchill, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, on June 4, 1940. This speech was delivered to the House of Commons of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, during the early stages of World War II. It is considered to be one of Churchill's most famous speeches, and it rallied the British people during a time of great uncertainty and danger.

~~~Harsha~~~

Bartolomé de Las Casas was the one that objected to the brutal treatment of native Americans.

The natives were treated brutally in the ways that they were made to leave the lands that they owned as heritage. The people that came to the lands took their resources and also engaged them in several battles where a lot of them died.

Also the people had to receive harsh treatments from the diseases and the illnesses that the explorers brought into their lands leading to the death of a lot of them.

Read more on native Americans here: https://brainly.com/question/24715290

#SPJ1

Let assume the context is educational sector, the Federal government's role in education is to provide funding, set standards and requirements, and enforce civil rights protections to promote high-quality education for all students.

The Federal government in the United States offers a range of programs and initiatives in the education sector, with the aim of promoting high-quality education for all students.

Some of the key programs and requirements include:

Read more about education sector

brainly.com/question/8461796

#SPJ1

Failed impeachment proceedings can result in the accused individual remaining in power, or damage to the credibility of the impeachment process.

Impeachment is the process by which a public official is charged with wrongdoing by a legislature or other legally constituted court. It can be understood as a unique process involving political and legal factors

If a federal official commits a crime or misbehaves, Parliament can impeach — formally impeach — that official. If the official is subsequently convicted in an impeachment trial in the Senate, she will be removed from office.

Learn more about impeachment:
https://brainly.com/question/29613803
#SPJ1

Answer:

A.  Oklahomans were angered that Congress never officially declared war in Vietnam, even though the conflict lasted for years.

Explanation:

got it right

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well

Answer:

Gerda Seifer's story is related to United States history in the sense that she is a Holocaust survivor who eventually emigrated to the United States. Her experiences provide a firsthand account of the horrors of the Nazi regime and serve as a reminder of the importance of international cooperation and human rights. Additionally, her story is a testament to the resilience of survivors and their ability to rebuild their lives in new and unfamiliar environments. The Gerda Seifer Yom HaShoah Fund also supports Holocaust remembrance and education initiatives in the United States

Explanation:

Answer:no answer

Explanation: what

Answer:

1775 — The Revolutionary War between the Colonies and Britain begins. 1781 — The last battle of the Revolutionary War takes place; the 13 states set up a federal government under laws called the Articles of Confederation.

Explanation:

This is some, and file answers are scams

Answer:

Turkey last week launched a military assault against the Kurds in northeast Syria, just days after the US pulled out its troops from the area due to “untenable” situation there.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Charter of 1732 permitted James Oglethorpe colonization authority over Georgia.

Explanation:

the number 4 on the map shows Puerto Rico.

From the given map of North America and the Caribbean Islands, Arrow 2 points to the largest island in the Caribbean, directly south of Florida.

Arrow 2 points to Cuba, and Arrow 3 points to an island just to the east of Cuba, that is, Hispaniola. Arrow 4 points to the east of the Dominican Republic, which is Puerto Rico. Thus, number 4 on the map shows Puerto Rico.

On the map of North America and the Caribbean Islands, Arrow 1 points to an island just off the eastern shore of Canada,

Arrow 2 points to the largest island in the Caribbean, directly south of Florida, Arrow 3 points to an island just to the east of Cuba, and Arrow 4 points to an island to the east of the Dominican Republic.

For more such questions on Puerto Rico, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/24373841

#SPJ8

Before  declaring independence, the Thirteen Colonies in their traditional groupings such as: New England, which included New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, and Connecticut, Middle, which included New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Delaware, and Southern state

Before the Revolutionary War, British colonies in North America had distinct governance and laws, but shared a connection to the British Crown. Their self-governance varied and was overseen by Crown-appointed colonial governments.

Each colony had a governor responsible for British policies and maintaining order, usually appointed by the Crown or a proprietor with land rights. Each colony had its own legislative body responsible for making local laws.

Learn more about   revolutionary war  from

https://brainly.com/question/18317211

#SPJ1

Answer:

France Revolution

Explanation:

I lika ya cut g hehehehe

can you provide an answer list? i'll update my answer once u have :)

Answer:

b

Explanation:

Answer:

1. democracy

2. totalitarian

3. not sure what this is asking

Explanation:

The Pendleton Act of 1883 addressed the issue of political patronage by establishing a merit-based system for government jobs, creating the Civil Service Commission, and prohibiting campaign donations from federal workers. It was a major reform of the American civil service system and helped to establish the modern, merit-based system that is still in use today.

The Pendleton Act of 1883 addressed the issue of political patronage in the United States by establishing a merit-based system for government jobs. Prior to the act, most government jobs were appointed based on a person's political connections rather than their qualifications or abilities. This system, known as the spoils system, led to widespread corruption and inefficiency in government.

The Pendleton Act created the Civil Service Commission, which oversaw the hiring and promotion of federal employees based on merit. Applicants for government jobs were required to take competitive exams to demonstrate their qualifications for the position. The act also prohibited government officials from soliciting campaign donations from federal workers and established a system for investigating and punishing violations of civil service laws.

The Pendleton Act was a major reform of the American civil service system and helped to establish the modern, merit-based system that is still in use today. It was the first federal law to regulate hiring and promotion practices in the federal government, and it marked a significant shift away from the corruption and inefficiency of the spoils system.

For more such questions on Civil Service Commission, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/13036232

#SPJ8

Answer:

One of the main strategies that the Song empire used to stay in power was the use of an army with professional soldiers, well prepared and well paid.

Explanation:

The Song Empire invested in an efficient military force to protect the dynasty from rebellions and riots that could harm or remove the dynasty from power.

For this, the Song empire invested in forming an army with strong and well-trained soldiers. It invested in the best and most technological training, so that soldiers were highly efficient, in addition to providing salary bins, to maintain soldiers' loyalty and effectiveness.

Nationalism cannot exist within an empire. Nationalism will most likely be responsible for the collapse of the empire because  nationalism delegitimizes imperial rule.

Nationalism refers to the absolute trust and support for a persons own Nation. Nationalism tends to show that a person places the interest of his own nation far above his personal interest and above the interest of other nations.

Nationalism emphasizes breeds patriotism, loyalty, devotion, or allegiance to a nation or nation-state and upholds the ideology that such obligations outweigh other individual or group interests.

An empire comprises of several nation-states which are under a sovereign rule. Nationalism cannot exist under an empire because the individual nations that make up the empire will always place the interest of their nations far above the interest of the empire. This is the reason why so many empires collapsed.

Learn more about Nationalism at https://brainly.com/question/25702229

#SPJ1

Answer: A, England

Explanation:

Liberal Democrats, British political party founded in 1988 through a merger of the Liberal Party and the Social Democratic Party (SDP). In the middle ground between the dominant Labor Party and Conservative Party, the Liberal Democrats occupy a center-left libertarian position

Answer:

A. England

Explanation:

Answer:

Progressive reform

Explanation:

Much of progressive reform began at the grassroots level and percolated upward into local, state, and eventually national politics as reformers attacked the social problems fostered by urban industrialism. While reform flourished in many different settings across the country, urban problems inspired the progressives' greatest efforts. Middle class women pushed for women's suffrage and progress and reform.

The connection between right-wing white Christian nationalism and the January 6, 2021, attack on the US Capitol can be explained in terms of the ideology that underlies this movement.

White Christian nationalists are a subset of the broader white nationalist movement, which is characterized by a belief in the superiority of white people over other races and a desire to establish a white-dominated society. In addition to their racial beliefs, white Christian nationalists also hold strong religious convictions. They believe that America was founded as a Christian nation and that Christianity should play a dominant role in American politics and culture. Many of these individuals view themselves as defenders of traditional American values, which they believe are under attack from liberals, immigrants, and other groups that they see as threats to their way of life.

The events of January 6, 2021, were driven by a combination of factors, including the belief that the election was stolen from former President Trump, a desire to prevent Congress from certifying the electoral college results, and a belief that the country was in the midst of a cultural and political crisis. For many white Christian nationalists, the storming of the Capitol was seen as a way to assert their power and defend their values against what they saw as a corrupt political establishment and a liberal cultural elite.

Overall, the connection between right-wing white Christian nationalism and the January 6th attack on the US Capitol is rooted in a belief system that sees white Christians as the rightful rulers of American society and seeks to maintain their dominance through political and cultural means.

Know more about racial beliefs here:

https://brainly.com/question/19891893

#SPJ8

Answer:

Paine asserts that mankind was originally in a state of equality, and, therefore, present inequalities must have been brought about by some circumstance. Paine says that a common distinction that lacks any natural or religious basis, is the division between kings and their subjects. This distinction, unlike those between male and female or good and evil, is not one "of heaven," and Paine wishes to inquire into its origin and its consequences.

Originally, Paine says, there were no kings in the world. Then, the ancient Jews copied the custom from the "heathens" who surrounded them. This was a grave mistake, and Paine maintains that in establishing a king for themselves, the Jews sinned. Man is supposed to have only God ruling over him, and to introduce a king, who in ruling over the people is like a God, is a grave misdeed. Eventually, Paine says, the Jewish people asked the prophet Samuel for a king. Samuel attempted dissuade the people, but they insisted that they wanted to have a King like the other nations, and God assented, even though he thought it evil that the people should want someone other than God to rule over them.

Featured on Sparknotes

XQUIZ: What % Hero and Villain Are You? | The SparkNotes Blog

Powered By  

Having considered the biblical origin of monarchy, Paine concludes that it is a practice begun in sinfulness. The many pages of scriptural evidence make it clear that God stands in opposition to monarchy. Paine moves on to attack the notion of the hereditary succession of the monarchy. Paine argues that, since all men are born equal, no man could have the right to establish his family as forever presiding over others. Even if a person deserves certain honors, his children may not deserve them, and that person has no right to pass those honors on.

Paine also observes that the recent kings of England have mostly been bad, which he says should indicate, even to those who favor hereditary succession, that the present line of kings does not exercise legitimate power.

Paine wonders where the power of kings originally comes from, and decides that this power is always based on one of three things: election, random selection, or usurpation. Paine says that if a king is chosen by election, this means all future kings should be chosen in the same way, and if the king usurped his throne, then the entire reign is illegitimate. Any way you look at it, hereditary succession is not valid. Paine adds that hereditary succession brings other evils with it. For example, people who see themselves as born into an elite existence are often "ignorant and unfit." Lastly, Paine refutes the theory that hereditary succession reduces civil wars, as there have been at least eight civil wars and nineteen rebellions in Britain's history. Monarchy and hereditary succession, Paine concludes have produced nothing in the world but bad governance and bloodshed.

Analysis

To the contemporary reader, Paine's slogging through mounds of biblical evidence might seem less interesting and less relevant, but in Paine's time, the bible shaped opinions on most matters. It was not uncommon to believe that kings ruled by divine right, and for this reason, many were hesitant to revolt against a King—after all, if the king's power was genuinely divine, a revolt against the king was akin to a revolt against God. Paine tries to undercut this line of thinking by attacking it on its own terms, and presenting Biblical passages that reject the idea of a divinely appointed monarchy. In this case, Paine presents an arsenal of Biblical evidence to show that monarchy is neither a natural nor a preferable institution.

Explanation:

Answer:

c

Explanation:

strictnjcfk Lal jhddgsdkkdshkds

Answer:

A

Explanation:

He was a liberal constructionist,  Liberal constructionism was linked to a strong National Government. Implied powers are those reasonably deduced from the expressed powers.

Explanation:

longitude is the vertical line while latitudeis the horizontal line

Answer:

food poison,stomach pain

Since he was out of office when World War I started, Otto von Bismarck had no direct influence on the conflict.

He had a huge influence on the events leading up to the war through his policies and deeds as the first Chancellor of the German Empire and the Chancellor of Prussia. By forging alliances and bolstering Prussia's military, Bismarck achieved his primary objective of improving Prussia's standing in Europe.

In order to make Prussia a powerful nation in Europe, he also orchestrated three brief wars against Denmark, Austria, and France. The complicated web of alliances and conflicts that ultimately resulted in the start of World War I was facilitated by Bismarck's policies and deeds.

As a result, the significance of the otto von Bismarck impact of WW1 are the aforementioned.

Learn more about on otto von Bismarck, here:

https://brainly.com/question/12801767

#SPJ1