Law is a practical discipline discipline ;theory has no place in law. With specific references to the law of contract discuss

The answer is "true." A contract entered into by an intoxicated person can be either voidable or valid.

When a person is intoxicated, their judgment may be impaired, and they may not fully understand the terms and implications of a contract. In such cases, the contract may be considered voidable, meaning that the intoxicated person has the option to either affirm or reject the contract. However, if the intoxicated person was still capable of understanding the nature and consequences of the contract despite their intoxication, the contract may still be considered valid. Ultimately, the determination of whether a contract entered into by an intoxicated person is voidable or valid will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the applicable laws and regulations.

To know more about voidable click here:

brainly.com/question/30471036

#SPJ4

Answer:

The officer has a basis to briefly stop and detain Sam and ask him what he is doing.

Explanation:

Sam probably walked away because he did not want the officer to detain him.

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

C.  Infant to fear a lab rat

Explanation:

The Little Albert Experiment expressed that traditional conditioning the relationship of a particular incentive or behavior with an irrelevant incentive or behavior works in human beings. In the research, psychologist John Watson was able to condition an earlier unafraid baby to become afraid of a rat.

Please give Brainliest :)

Answer:

Contract law deals with agreements made under the consent of the parties who have a sound mind. A sound mind means they are able to understand the rules and regulations of the contract and when does it not apply and they are able to take decision on their own that is they are above a certain age, not a minor.

Explanation:

These contracts could be of any nature like agreements , for marriage, sales , shipment any other stating the rules and the limits .

Example 1:

A agrees to sell his house to B for $ 100,000 on a particular date or within 6 months' time period. If A refuses or is unable to keep his agreement with B then he/ she will be responsible and penalized as stated in the contract or according to country rules.

Example 2:

A agrees to deliver the goods to B at a fixed time on a particular day for an exchange of equal amount of petrol ( or any other thing).

If B is unwilling to pay or given equal amounts of the goods as per contract A need not deliver the goods and the contract becomes void.

Example 3:

A and B enter a contract where B has to do a certain work . But A does not let him do it. So it is up to B either to continue or discontinue at his own will.

In all of the above three scenarios we see that the law is practical. For each agreement or law disobeyed there is an alternative either breaking the law or taking other steps. IT is not just theoretical.

Example 4:

A, a singer, contract with B, the manager of a theatre, to sing at his theatre for two nights in every week during the next two months, and B engages to pay her  100  Taka  for  each  night's  performance.  On  the  sixth  night,  A  wilfully  absents herself from the theatre, and B, in consequence, rescinds the contract. B  is  entitled  to  claim  compensation  for  the  damage  which  he  has  sustained  through the non-fulfilment of the contract.

In the example above we see that A will have to pay for the damages to B caused by her absentee.

Example 5:

A  lets  to  B,  for  hire,  a  horse  for  his  own  riding.  B  drives  the  horse  in  his  carriage. This is, at the option of A, a termination of the bailment.

In this example also the termination is by wrong usage  or mis usage of the horse.

In each of the examples above the law is not just theory. It has practical applications in our daily life.

If a manufacturer of computers sells 4100 units per year, the manufacturer carries approximately 169 days of supply in inventory.

Average Daily Sales = Total Units Sold per Year / Number of Days in a Year

= 4100 units / 365 days

≈ 11.23 units per day

Next, we calculate the number of days of supply by dividing the average number of computers in inventory by the average daily sales:

Days of Supply = Average Computers in Inventory / Average Daily Sales

= 1900 units / 11.23 units per day

≈ 169.29 days

Learn more about inventory at:

brainly.com/question/31827018

#SPJ4

The Wendy's chili example in this lesson demonstrates the damages that false statements and product disparagement can cause in tort law.

Defamation is a tort that encompasses false statements about a person or entity that harm their reputation. In this case, the false claim of finding a finger in the chili caused damage to Wendy's brand image, leading to a decline in sales and public trust.

Moreover, the false statement also constitutes product disparagement or trade libel, which involves making false statements about a business's products or services to harm their reputation and economic interests.

The Wendy's chili incident highlights the potential harm caused by false statements in tort law, leading to financial losses, reputational damage, and the need for legal recourse to seek compensation for the damages suffered.

Learn more about Defamation here:

https://brainly.com/question/28196525

#SPJ11

The quantum meruit standard is used to calculate each party's share of the compensation in a quasi-contract settlement.

Implied contracts are another name for quasi-contracts. The defendant is required to make restitution payments to the plaintiff or the harmed party once they have been mandated. Quantum meruit is the legal term for this payback, which is determined by the amount of money or item worth that the defendant unlawfully gained.

A plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant consented to the services they were to perform for them and anticipated paying them in order for their quantum meruit claim to succeed. The defendant must also be shown to have been unfairly enriched, which implies that they were given free products or services, according to the plaintiff.

Learn more about quasi-contracts: https://brainly.com/question/4392832

#SPJ4

The concept of discretion refers to the ability of criminal justice personnel to choose from an array of options or outcomes based on their own interpretation of events and experience levels.

Discretion allows for flexibility in decision-making and allows criminal justice professionals to take into account individual circumstances and context when making choices about how to respond to a situation. However, discretion can also lead to inconsistencies and biases in decision-making, which is why it is important for criminal justice personnel to receive ongoing training and guidance on how to exercise discretion in a fair and ethical manner.

This discretionary power allows them to exercise their professional judgment in determining the appropriate course of action, including the choice of outcomes or options, within the boundaries of legal and ethical considerations. Discretion plays a significant role in how criminal justice professionals handle cases, and make decisions regarding arrests, charges, plea bargains, sentencing, and other aspects of the criminal justice process.

Learn more about Criminal Justice :- https://brainly.com/question/28481896

#SPJ11

Answer: A

Explanation:

The chapter starts out with Gideon v. Wainwright, Clarence Gideon was a fifty-one-year-old man accused of stealing change from a poolroom in Panama City.

He could not afford to pay an attorney; he, therefore, was not able to have representation in the courtroom. In the process of his trial, Gideon requested that an attorney be provided, and he was denied by the judge. While Gideon was incarcerated, he mailed a petition to the Supreme Court and changed history. The Supreme Court ruled in his favor.The Gideon v. Wainwright case refers to a landmark decision by the US Supreme Court that mandated states to provide counsel to criminal defendants who were unable to afford legal representation on their own. The ruling was delivered on March 18, 1963. Clarence Earl Gideon was a poor Florida man who was charged with stealing wine and money from a pool hall in June 1961.

Gideon requested an attorney during his trial but was denied, and the court found him guilty and sentenced him to five years in prison. Clarence Gideon sent a handwritten letter to the Supreme Court from his cell, and his case was taken up by a legal team.

To know more about Clarence Gideon visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32445231

#SPJ11

The 1925 prosecution of science instructor John Scopes for attempting to teach creation in Tennessee public school, that had been deemed unlawful by recent laws, is known as Scopes Trial, referred as Scopes Monkey Trial.

The State of Tennessee vs. John Thomas Scopes, also known as that of the Scopes Monkey Trial, had been an American legal case that took place from July 10th to July 21st, 1925. John T. Scopes, a high school teacher, was accused of breaking the Butler Act of Tennessee, which made it unlawful for educators to teach about human evolution in either state-funded school. The trial was purposefully set up to generate notoriety for the little Tennessee town of Dayton, in which it was held.

To know more about Scopes Trial:

brainly.com/question/3851066

#SPJ4

Answer:

C. Bonds

Explanation:

A P E X

Savings accounts, cash ISAs, annuities, government bonds and protected funds are considered low risk investments. Cash is the most stable investment option, but the returns are not usually as high as fixed-interest securities.

Correct option is C.

"Bonds" are an example of a low-risk investment.

A bond is a financial instrument that allows an investor to lend money to a borrower, such as a corporation or the government. The money is used to fund the borrower's operations, and the investor is paid interest on the investment. A bond's market value might fluctuate over time.

To know more about Low-risk investment, refer to the link:

https://brainly.com/question/25264302

Sykes and Matze called these circumstances techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally clean or neutralize their crimes and strain themselves into that they aren't really criminals.

Skill is the ability to carry out a task with discovered results. The knowledge base technique is any systematic way of acquiring information about a scientific nature. Ability to treat such details or use such social movement, and good piano skillfulness.

Sykes and Matze’s techniques of neutralization allow crime to occur justifications techniques of neutralization because, by pursuing them, offenders were able to mentally

Therefore, Sykes and Matze called these justifications techniques of neutralization

Learn more about techniques here:

https://brainly.com/question/17130704

#SPJ1

Answer:

Law school is expensive, but if you have scholarship, it won't be a problem. Here is some good law schools. (Beware, they may be expensive.)

All have some sort of law included.

Answer:

Explanation:

C

The answer is C, ​became effective on May 5th. Prior to the 5th, our subject Sam was not aware of the revocation. On the 5th, when Sam received the letter, Ralph at that point had officially revoked the offer.

I hope I've helped! :)

Answer:

False. Hope this helped!

Explanation:

The criminal justice system's goals are to defend society, deal with offenders, and rehabilitate criminals.

It accomplishes this by having the culprit be arrested and put on trial for their crimes. If found guilty, they face jail time or additional penalties including fines or community service.

Police-based services offer crucial support to crime victims, such as on-site crisis intervention and arranging for emergency medical care. A victim's short- and long-term rebuilding may also benefit from the information and referrals provided by law enforcement programs to services and resources.

Learn more about criminal justice system here

https://brainly.com/question/7207817

#SPJ1

In an oligopoly, the market is shared among a few firms. Competition is limited in an oligopoly for various reasons, which are explained below:

Interdependence: In an oligopoly, firms are interdependent on each other. Every firm's decision will affect the other firms' profits and market share. Therefore, firms have to consider their rival's responses before taking any action. Firms are not in a position to decide on the price of the product because the price is linked to the output of the industry.

Pricing strategies: Firms in an oligopoly focus on non-price competition, like product differentiation, branding, and advertising. Firms in an oligopoly tend to differentiate their products to create brand loyalty. This type of competition requires a significant amount of capital, which makes it hard for new entrants.

Barriers to entry: Firms in an oligopoly use several barriers to prevent new firms from entering the market. High capital costs, government regulations, and patents are some of the entry barriers used in oligopolistic markets.

Non-Price Competition: Firms in an oligopoly are not allowed to compete based on prices. Firms need to use different types of non-price competition to compete effectively. Product differentiation, research and development, advertising, and branding are some of the strategies used in an oligopoly to differentiate the products from their competitors'.Thus, competition is limited in an oligopoly because of the interdependence between the firms, non-price competition, entry barriers, and pricing strategies.

Know more about oligopoly here:

https://brainly.com/question/29518761

#SPJ8

B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.

A senior officer may discipline him by giving him a warning if it is claimed (by a citizen or peer) that he has been disrespectful, behaved improperly, abused his authority, or neglected to perform his task.

Enforcement of economic laws and the pursuit of economic crime in India are the responsibilities of the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), a law enforcement and economic intelligence organisation. It is a component of the Ministry of Finance's Department of Revenue in India.

To know more about police visit:-

brainly.com/question/24655820

#SPJ9

Complete question:

In the context of policing, which of the following statements is true about in-service training?

A. It is the least effective training tool in communicating new state legislations or court decisions to experienced police officers.

B. It is designed to provide a refresher to experienced officers on basic issues such as the use-of-force policy in a police department.

C. It is usually given to new recruits before they join their police departments.

D. It is primarily used to weed out new recruits who underperform during their probationary period.

Answer: Driving without corrective lenses can result in injury to yourself and others. If your driver's license includes a corrective lenses restriction, you have to wear your glasses when driving.

Explanation:

The answer is False. The false statements of fact must be communicated by the defendant to a third person

In order for an act to be established as a tort of injurious falsehood, the false statements of fact must be communicated by the defendant to a third person. This means that the false statement must be made to someone other than the person who is actually being misled.

If the false statement is made directly to the person who is being misled, it may constitute a separate tort such as defamation or intentional infliction of emotional distress.

In summary, for an act to be established as a tort of injurious falsehood, the false statements of fact must be communicated by the defendant to a third person, the false statement must be a statement of fact rather than an opinion, and the false statement must cause harm to the person who relies on it.

To know more about defendant, visit:-

brainly.com/question/30736002?

#SPJ11

Answer: The United State government pushed for "plain language" after 9/11 because the inter-organizational discussion was hurt by codes. For a while, they pushed it hard (there may have been laws but I don't ken for sure) but later recanted and now "plain language" is only required when more than one organization is involved. From what I have optically discerned, many emergency accommodation men and women prefer utilizing the 10 codes, especially in certain situations where predilection for discretion is propitious. I do believe there should still be the implementation of it as simply saying 10-24 is better than yelling "f'ing send backup this man sent shots at me" but I understand stress can interfere with our competency to recollect certain things, especially in an emergency field. What's nice about 10 codes is that if everybody on the job understands them, you can convey a lot in a concise message. It'd be prevalent to describe how a tour went just with the mundane 10 codes. some people are immensely colossal proponents of plain English. You can articulate what is genuinely transpiring rather than utilizing pre-determined 10 code that may not be entirely precise. I cerebrate plain English AND 10 codes should be the default method of communication if you are in command or interfacing with certain agencies or predicaments. Clear and efficacious communication is often the first causality in the war of "oh shoot" calls. Though I can cerebrate of a few instances where, within a single agency and intra-agency communication, I believe 10 codes would be more utilizable than plain English. An area with poor radio communication may benefit from a 10-code that is able to convey an entire sentence. Or if you are unable for whatever reason to openly request a resource such as the police or convivial workers. That would be my modernization of the ten code

Explanation:

I'm kinda slow but had the same question so here was my probably bad  answer lol

Answer:

The procedure is straightforward. Identify, quantify, and total the related benefits and costs for each decision or path in consideration. The benefit-cost ratio for that particular decision is then calculated by dividing the overall benefits by the total expenses.

Explanation:

Answer:

Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law. Discuss the differences between legislation and case law and further explain the relationship between the two sources of law.

Explanation:

It is very difficult to reduce the national debt of a nation because little amounts are left after goods and services need to be paid for to ensure the welfare of the nation.

The national budget of the nation:

Because the national budget includes the various expenses of the nation such as salaries and national defense, there is usually very little left to enable the repayment of debt so the nation sticks to paying interest payments instead.

In conclusion, the national debt of a nation is hard to reduce because the government has to cover national expenses.

Find out more at https://brainly.com/question/3467411.

Answer:

Answer:

v

Explanation:

h

True. Sometimes courts rely on decisions made by other judges in previous cases, especially those that are relevant and similar to the matter at hand.

This practice is known as "precedent" or "stare decisis" and is commonly employed in common law systems.

False. Each provincial and territorial system of courts typically has multiple levels. There are usually multiple levels of courts, including trial courts, appellate courts, and in some cases, a final court of appeal. The final court of appeal is the highest level in the judicial hierarchy and is responsible for reviewing and deciding on appeals from lower courts.

Learn more about decisions  here:

https://brainly.com/question/29104188

#SPJ11