problem 4. for sales promotion a manufacturer places winning symbols under the caps of 15% of all produced sprite bottles. assume that winning symbols are placed independently. you buy an eight-pack. question 1: find the probability that you will not win at all. (round your answer to 2 places after the decimal point).

Answer:

M(-2; -5)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

266.386

Step-by-step explanation:

im not shore if its right, i used a surface area calculator

Answer:

56ft

Step-by-step explanation:

Surface area is adding up all the sides multiplied by 2, so:

8 x 2 = 16ft

8 x 2 = 16ft

12 x 2 = 24ft

24ft + 16ft + 16ft = 56ft

When two tables have a one-to-many relationship, you typically need to add a foreign key to the table on the "many" side to link the records to the corresponding record in the "one" table.

In a one-to-many relationship, the table on the "one" side is usually the primary key table, and the table on the "many" side is usually the foreign key table. The foreign key is used to link the records in the "many" table to the corresponding record in the "one" table. This is done by adding a column to the "many" table that contains the primary key value from the "one" table.

When designing a database, it is important to establish relationships between tables to ensure data integrity and avoid redundant data. In a one-to-many relationship, one record in the primary key table can be associated with many records in the foreign key table. To establish a one-to-many relationship, you need to create a primary key in the "one" table and a foreign key in the "many" table. The foreign key is a column that contains the primary key value from the "one" table. For example, if you have a "customers" table and an "orders" table, the "customers" table would be the primary key table and the "orders" table would be the foreign key table. Each record in the "orders" table would have a foreign key column that contains the customer ID from the "customers" table.

To know more than tables visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/14231889

#SPJ11

Answer:

i am srry i dont know but can you give me branliest answer pls even if i dont know

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

C ig.

Step-by-step explanation:

well, it's not a right angle (90 degrees), it's not a 45 degree angle, and it's not a straight angle (180 degrees), so it's not enough info

Answer: C not enough info

Step-by-step explanation: if it was 90 it would have a box instead of a circle. 45 would be more obvious  and 180 is a straight line. In order to find <1 you need to know the angle next to it. So it does not work. Hope this helped. go answer my question!

There exists a sequence of points zn in the unit disk with |zn| → 1 such that f(z) is bounded.

Let's assume the contrary, that f(z) is unbounded in the unit disk. Then, for each positive integer n, there exists a point zn in the unit disk such that |f(zn)| > n. Consider the sequence zn in the unit disk. Since the unit disk is bounded, this sequence must have a limit point z ∈ ¯D (closure of the unit disk).By the maximum modulus principle, f(z) cannot attain its maximum within ¯D unless f is a constant function. But f is holomorphic, so it must have a maximum on the boundary of the unit disk, i.e., |f(zn)| ≤ M for some positive constant M and all n. This contradicts our initial assumption that |f(zn)| > n for all n. Therefore, the assumption that f(z) is unbounded must be false.

Hence, there exists a sequence of points zn in the unit disk with |zn| → 1 such that f(z) is bounded.

To know more about sequence  visit:

https://brainly.com/question/33469806

#SPJ11

the correct answer is 4.05

x = 0 and Reduced cost = -4: This combination is not possible for decision variable x and its corresponding reduced cost.

Based on the complementary slackness condition in linear programming, the values of the decision variable x and its corresponding reduced cost can provide insights into the feasibility and optimality of the solution.

In the given scenarios:

x = 20 and Reduced cost = -4:

This combination is possible as a non-zero value of x with a negative reduced cost indicates that x is a non-basic variable and has a potential to increase in order to improve the objective function value.

x = 0 and Reduced cost = -4:

This combination is not possible because if x is a non-basic variable with a reduced cost of -4,

it implies that increasing x from zero would improve the objective function value, violating the complementary slackness condition.

x = 0 and Reduced cost = 0:

This combination is possible as x can be a basic variable with a reduced cost of zero,

indicating that it is at its lower bound and does not need to change.

x = 20 and Reduced cost = 0:

This combination is possible as a non-zero value of x with a reduced cost of zero implies that x is a non-basic variable and has already reached its upper bound,

so it does not need to change to improve

the objective function value.

Learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/15078630

#SPJ4

Answer:

The correct answer is B. 208

Answer:

Each one-inch binder costs $2.67 and each two-inch binder costs $6.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the cost of a one-inch binder "x" and the cost of a two-inch binder "y".

From Hansen's purchase, we know that 3x + 2y = $20.

From Pam's purchase, we know that 3x + 5y = $32.

We can use these two equations to solve for the cost of each size of binder. If we subtract the first equation from the second, we get:

2y = $32 - $20 = $12

So, y = $6, which is the cost of a two-inch binder.

Next, we can plug this value back into either of the original equations to find the cost of a one-inch binder:

3x + 2($6) = $20

Expanding the right side, we get:

3x + $12 = $20

Subtracting $12 from both sides, we get:

3x = $8

Finally, dividing both sides by 3, we find that:

x = $2.67

So, each one-inch binder costs $2.67 and each two-inch binder costs $6.

The nearby tower that casts a shadow that is 39.5 m long is 85 m tall.

Ratio is the relationship between two quantities, normally expressed as the quotient of one divided by the other.

The ratio of the shadow of a pole to its length is 1.4 m : 3 m.

At the same time, the ratio of the shadow of a tower to its length should  also be equal to the ratio of the shadow of a pole to its length, which is 1.4 : 3.

Let x = length of the tower

Using proportion, determine the length of the tower by solving for x.

1.4 : 3 = 39.5 m : x

x = 39.5(3)/1.4

x = 84.64

Round off to the nearest meter.

length of the tower = 85 meters

Learn more about ratio here: brainly.com/question/13513438

#SPJ4

Answer:

thats the answer

Answer:

x = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

Use distributive property:

3(2x+4) = 24

3*2x + 3*4 = 24

6x+12 = 24

6x = 12

x = 2

Answer:

hope this helps.

Step-by-step explanation:

A right angle is an angle measuring exactly 90 degrees. A congruent angle is an angle that has the same measure as another angle. Therefore, for two angles to be congruent, they must have the same measure, and if they are right angles, they must each measure exactly 90 degrees.

Since both angles measure exactly 90 degrees, and any two right angles are always equal, the hypothesis that "If two angles are right angles, then they are congruent" is true. A right angle is one of the most common types of angles and is found in a variety of geometric shapes, including squares, rectangles, and triangles.

Because they always measure exactly 90 degrees, they are easy to identify and work with when solving geometry problems. In conclusion, two angles are congruent if they have the same measure, and if they are both right angles, they are also congruent because they both measure exactly 90 degrees.

The hypothesis that "If two angles are right angles, then they are congruent" is true.

Learn more about congruent from the given link

https://brainly.com/question/30596171

#SPJ11

Answer:

Aware root of 16 is square root of 4

Step-by-step explanation:

4×4= 16

Hope this helps!!!

Answer:

n = 250

See solution and check blow.

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution:

-17 + n/5 = 33

Add 17 to both sides.

-17 + 17 + n/5 = 33 + 17

n/5 = 50

Multiply both sides by 5.

n/5 × 5 = 50 × 5

n = 250

Check:

-17 + n/5 = 33

Since we found out that n = 250, substitute 250 for n in the equation.

-17 + 250/5 = 33

Simplify the left side. Divide 250 by 5.

-17 + 50 = 33

Add on the left side.

33 = 33

Since 33 = 33 is a true statement, the solution n = 250 is correct.

Answer:

slope = \(\frac{5}{4}\)

Step-by-step explanation:

The equation of a line in slope- intercept form is

y = mx + c ( m is the slope and c the y- intercept )

y = \(\frac{5}{4}\) x - \(\frac{7}{4}\) ← is in slope- intercept form

with slope m = \(\frac{5}{4}\)

The solution of the equation y = (2/3)x + 3 is 5/3

The given equation is

y = (2/3)x + 3

The slope of the line is the change in y coordinates with respect to the change in x coordinates.

This is the linear equation in the the slope intercept form

y = mx + b

Where m is the slope of the line

b is the y intercept

y is the y coordinates

x is the x coordinates

The value of x = -2

Substitute the value of x in the equation

y = (2/3) × -2 + 3

Do the arithmetic operations

= -4/3 + 3

Add the numbers

= 5/3

Therefore, the solution is 5/3

I have solved the question in general, as the given question is incomplete

The complete question is:

What is the solution of the equation y = (2/3)x + 3x, when x = -2?

Learn more about slope intercept form here

brainly.com/question/9682526

#SPJ4

The simple interest earned on $500 at 6% for 18 months is given as follows:

$45.

The equation that gives the balance of an account after t years, considering simple interest, is modeled as follows:

A(t) = P(1 + rt).

In which the parameters of the equation are listed and explained as follows:

The interest accrued is given by the difference between the balance and the initial amount, hence it is given as follows:

I(t) = Prt.

The parameter values for this problem are given as follows:

P = 500, r = 0.06, t = 18/12 = 1.5 years.

Hence the interest is given as follows:

I(1.5) = 500 x 0.06 x 1.5

I(1.5) = $45.

The problem is incomplete, hence it was only possible to obtain the interest accrued.

More can be learned about simple interest at https://brainly.com/question/20690803

#SPJ1

Answer:

  2048

Step-by-step explanation:

You want the value of a10 = 4(2^(10 -1)).

If you don't have powers of 2 memorized, you can put this expression into your calculator or spreadsheet to get it evaluated. You will need parentheses around the exponent.

  4(2^(10-1)) = 4(2^9) = 4(512) = 2048

The value of the expression is 2048.

__

Additional comment

This looks like an instance of the equation for the n-th term of a geometric sequence:

  an = a1·r^(n -1)

where a1 = 4, r = 2, and n = 10.

This is why we have assumed that the "-1" is part of the exponent, and that you simply want the value of the right-side expression.

If this equation means something else, then it needs to be written differently. For example, if a10 means 'a' to the 10th power, it needs to be written as a^10, and we need to be told we're solving for 'a'.

<95141404393>

Answer:

–10m4n3 + 8m2n6 + 3m4n3 – 2m2n6 – 6m2n6 = -7m4n3

⇒It is a monomial with a degree of 7 is correct

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a square is x²

This means it is  x² = 64cm²

x= 8cm <------ One side

Since it is a square, all sides are the same length.

8*4 = 32cm

Side of the square: 8 cm

Perimeter: 32cm

Answer: The answer is 19.47

(a)The optimal order quantity is  4609 units.

(b)The time between orders is  1.98 months.

To determine the optimal order quantity and the approximate time between orders, the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) model. The EOQ model minimizes the total cost of inventory by balancing ordering costs and carrying costs.

Optimal Order Quantity:

The formula for the EOQ is given by:

EOQ = √[(2DS) / H]

Where:

D = Annual demand

S = Cost per order

H = Holding cost per unit per year

calculate the annual demand (D) using the 2020

sales numbers provided:

D = 651 + 808 + 514 + 174 + 435 + 426 + 687 + 582 + 662 + 1551 + 1295 + 1774

= 9559 units

To calculate the cost per order (S) and the holding cost per unit per year (H).

The cost per order (S) is given as $500.

The holding cost per unit per year (H)  calculated as follows:

H = Carrying cost percentage × Unit value

= 0.30 × $3

= $0.90

substitute these values into the EOQ formula:

EOQ = √[(2 × 9559 × $500) / $0.90]

= √[19118000 / $0.90]

≈ √21242222.22

≈ 4608.71

Approximate Time Between Orders:

To calculate the approximate time between orders, we'll divide the total number of working days in a year by the number of orders per year.

Assuming 360 days in a year and a lead time of 1 week (7 days) for shipping, we have:

Working days in a year = 360 - 7 = 353 days

Approximate time between orders = Working days in a year / Number of orders per year

= 353 / (9559 / 4609)

= 0.165 years

Converting this time to months:

Approximate time between orders (months) = 0.165 × 12

= 1.98 months

To know more about quantity here

https://brainly.com/question/14581760

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

a) sum of angle on the straight line TRW is 180.

Given <TRS = 2x+10

<SRW = x-10

<TRS+<SRW = 180

2x+10+x-10 = 180

3x = 180

x = 180/3

x = 60°

<TRV = 180°-(2x+10)

Substitute x = 60° into the expression

<TRV = 180-(2(60)+10)

<TRV = 180-(120+10)

<TRV = 180-130

<TRV = 50°

2) From the diagram attached <MHJ= <LHK (oppositely directed angle)

Given

<MHJ= x+15

<LHK = 2x-20

Substitute the given data into the formula to get x

x+15= 2x-20

x-2x = -15-20

-x = -35

x = 35°

Next is to get the measure of <MHJ

<MHJ = x+15

<MHJ = 35+15

<MHJ = 50°

Answer:

\( \sf \: 56ef \)

Step-by-step explanation:

Now we have to,

→ simplify the given expression.

Forming the expression,

→ 7 × e × f × 8

Let's simplify the expression,

→ 7 × e × f × 8

→ (7 × 8) × (e × f)

→ (56) × (ef)

→ 56 × ef

→ 56ef

Hence, the answer is 56ef.

When testing the null hypothesis with an alpha value of 0.05, the critical value will be larger than if you were testing with an alpha value of 0.01.

If you are testing the null hypothesis with an alpha value of 0.05, the critical value will be smaller than if you were testing the alpha value of 0.01. This is because a smaller alpha value means a more stringent test of significance, which requires stronger evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, the critical value is larger for a smaller alpha value to reflect the higher level of evidence required for rejection. Conversely, a larger alpha value allows for a less stringent test of significance, requiring weaker evidence to reject the null hypothesis, which results in a smaller critical value.

Know more about the alpha value

https://brainly.com/question/30639544

#SPJ11