Three possible impacts of violent service delivery protests in south african communities

Answer:

In my opinion I think so because what happened to our rights and people that don't obey the law should be the one's to pay for it not us.

hope this helps

have a good day :)

Explanation:

Answer:

Offering public access to state papers is one of the key ways that government institutions may encourage transparency to their peoples. Because technology offers rapid access to information, it's vital that government agencies are fulfilling public expectations via transparent records management.

Explanation:

Hope it helps:)

Answer:

Joe did the right thing by leaving a note with his name and number on it to take responsibility for the accident. It shows maturity and responsibility, and it is the ethical thing to do. Even though his parents may have been angry about the situation, leaving the scene of the accident without taking responsibility could have resulted in legal consequences and could have caused more problems in the future.

In this situation, Joe should communicate with the car owner and discuss how the dent can be fixed. He can offer to pay for the damages out of his own pocket, or suggest getting a few quotes from different body shops to compare prices. If the owner agrees to accept payment from Joe, he should get a written agreement or receipt of payment to avoid any legal disputes in the future.

Joe's parents should support him in taking responsibility for his actions and help him find a solution to the problem. They can work together with Joe to find a solution that works for everyone involved, and help him negotiate with the car owner to reach a fair resolution.

In general, situations like this can be solved through open communication and taking responsibility for one's actions. By communicating honestly and openly with the other party involved, it is often possible to find a solution that works for everyone.

If Joe didn't try to contact the owner of the car ever again, it could result in legal consequences. Leaving the scene of an accident without taking responsibility is a serious offense, and could result in criminal charges or a civil lawsuit. It is always best to take responsibility for one's actions and try to find a solution to the problem.

Answer:

True

Explanation:

Answer:

The Correct approach will be "correlational, causes, directionality and third variable".

Explanation:

Because then the answer is indeed the correct one.

The correlational studiesis a research where the researcher measures two variables and assesses the statistical relationship between them.

Read more about correlational study

brainly.com/question/4272060

Answer:

There are four Rules of Statutory Interpretation, these are (1) the literal rule, (2) the golden rule, (3) the mischief rule and (4) the purposive approach.

The individual-rights advocates would support the protection of personal freedoms and civil rights. Thus, option (a) is correct.

What is advocates ?

Defend, debate, and support someone's unique idea is what the word "advocate" refers to. Typically, lawyers use the term "advocate." A person with the right to represent a party in court is known as an advocate.

Advocates for individual rights mean defending the human and legal rights of people. Advocates for individual rights include those for civil rights, economic rights, social rights, political rights, cultural rights, etc.

Therefore, option (a)  individual-rights advocates is correct.

Learn more about on advocates, here:

https://brainly.com/question/8994455

#SPJ2

I'm a little bit confused between a and b..

but I found this maybe it will help u..

Explanation:

The Court held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that firearm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self- defense within the home.

The concepts of social justice embraced by Ubuntu include equity (encourages interdependence), fairness, and equality (promotes equal opportunities) (brings about equal sharing of resources such that all members survive).

In Bantu, the word "Ubuntu" means "humanity" and is an African word. The full concept of "humanity for others" is expressed in this sentence. If a person has endured physical, mental, or emotional injury, they are regarded as a victim.

When a victim reports an incident, police take the proper action by acquiring all necessary data. Nonetheless, Ubuntu's guiding principles place more of an emphasis on what is ethically right than what is right. The general population ought to have more empathy for the victims and treat them with dignity.

Occasionally, a victim will kill a perpetrator. It is not appropriate for the investigating authorities to assume the victim was also the attacker in this situation. Investigating the scene of the crime and obtaining the murderer's testimony should be the police' top priorities. Prior to the investigation's conclusion, they shouldn't regard the person as either a victim or a criminal.

Compared to other philosophies, Ubuntu's approach to problem solving is slightly different. We should always have a big picture in Ubuntu. For instance, when a person travels, they might not always have a place to stay. The villagers may occasionally provide the things that the travelers need. The fact that the villagers give the travelers supplies is unimportant, but they nevertheless do it. This is due to their increased humanity and the assistance they give to others.

When a person poses a threat to large individuals, poisoning the subject is necessary. According to Ubuntu's guiding principles, a victim should be handled with compassion and ethics.

Learn more about Ubuntu's guiding principles: https://brainly.com/question/17259369

#SPJ9

In recent decades, new justices have most commonly been appointed from: a. Lower federal courts.

This statement is correct. Over the past few decades, it has been more common for new justices to be appointed from lower federal courts. Many Supreme Court justices have previously served as judges in federal circuit courts or district courts before being nominated to the Supreme Court.

This pattern allows presidents to evaluate their judicial records and experience before considering them for the highest court in the land. However, it is important to note that justices have also been appointed from other backgrounds, including state supreme courts, executive agencies, and academia, but the trend of selecting justices from lower federal courts has been more prevalent in recent years.

To know more about federal court:

https://brainly.com/question/32812355

#SPJ4

In accordance with Article III of the Constitution, judges "shall keep their offices during good behavior." Although a little ambiguous, the meaning is obvious.

The seventh book of the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament is the Book of Judges. The time between the conquest recorded in the Book of Joshua and the founding of a kingdom depicted in the Books of Samuel is covered in the Hebrew Bible's narrative. During this period, biblical judges acted as temporary rulers. The narratives all have  similar structure: the people turn away from Yahweh and are thus given over to their enemies; they repent and beg Yahweh for mercy, and he responds by sending a leader or champion; the judge frees the Israelites from oppression and they prosper; soon after, they turn away from Yahweh once more, and the cycle is repeated.  Many of the tales are taken into consideration by academics.

Learn more about  judges from

brainly.com/question/29885435

#SPJ4

Answer:

By having strong evidences mostly regarding his case or/and witnesses of course

Explanation:

The control procedures listed in this chapter may be insufficient in stopping this type of fraud due to several reasons. The control procedures mentioned in a chapter or any specific resource may not cover all possible scenarios or variations of fraud.

Fraudulent activities can be diverse and constantly evolving, requiring adaptable and comprehensive control measures. Additionally, fraudsters may find ways to circumvent or exploit existing control procedures, exposing their weaknesses. Moreover, the effectiveness of control procedures can be influenced by factors such as human error, collusion, lack of resources, or inadequate implementation and monitoring. Thus, while control procedures play a crucial role in mitigating fraud, their limitations and the dynamic nature of fraud itself can render them insufficient in fully stopping this type of fraudulent activity.

To know more about control procedures, click here: brainly.com/question/30702193

#SPJ11

Answer:

Expressway entrances include three areas: the entrance ramp, the acceleration lane, and the merge area. The entrance ramp allows the driver time to search traffic for flow and traffic gaps and evaluate speed and space requirements before entering. These ramps may be uphill, downhill, or level with the expressway.

Explanation:

Hope this helps

Earning enough money to take a vacation is a compensation rewards of work factor. The correct option is c.

Earned income enables the ability to take a vacation, which is option C- Compensation. Wages, salaries and bonuses are all examples of financial rewards for work, which collectively constitute compensation. A concrete result of the compensation factor is the ability to earn enough money to take a vacation.

Demonstrating the connection between one's efforts at work and the financial resources that allow them to engage in leisure activities. This aspect of pay demonstrates how the financial benefits of work can be translated into rewarding experiences and benefits outside the workplace which benefits employees general wellbeing and work-life balance.

To know more about financial resources here

brainly.com/question/32199479

#SPJ3

Answer:

what is this  

Explanation:

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

An individual chooses to commit crime if he can gain more from crime than not committing the crime. This gain from crime is not limited to monetary gains. Criminals may gain a lot from guilty pleasure and excitement from breaking the law, inflicting violence, and consuming illicit drugs. But even when accounting for all the monetary and non-monetary gains from crime, it seems like crime usually does not “pay”(Future learn).

Hence, an individual may choose to commit crime if the immediate rewards of the crime seem to outweigh the long time consequences of the crime. This is a rational decision. Finally, criminals make rational decisions because most of them usually consider the net gain of crime to outweigh the net loss of crime.

Answer: Yes

Explanation:

The party who lost in the lower court and files the first appeal is called the appellant.

In the legal system, the appellant is the party who initiates the appeal by filing a notice of appeal after an unfavorable decision in the lower court. The appellant seeks a review of the lower court's decision by a higher court, typically with the goal of having the decision reversed, modified, or remanded for further proceedings.

The role of the appellant is to present arguments and legal grounds to support their claim that the lower court made an error in its decision. They are responsible for drafting and filing the necessary documents, such as the notice of appeal, the appellant's brief, and any supporting documentation or evidence, within the specified time frames and in compliance with procedural rules.

The appellant's brief is a crucial component of the appeal process. It outlines the legal arguments, identifies the alleged errors made by the lower court, and provides legal authority and precedent to support the appellant's position. The appellant's brief aims to persuade the higher court that the lower court's decision was incorrect and should be overturned.

It is important to note that the role of the appellant may vary depending on the jurisdiction and the specific rules and procedures of the appellate court. In some cases, the appellant may also be required to pay filing fees or adhere to specific formatting and citation rules when submitting their appeal.

Once the appellant has filed the appeal, the opposing party, known as the appellee or respondent, has the opportunity to respond to the appeal by filing their own brief. The appellee's brief presents counterarguments and defends the lower court's decision, seeking to convince the higher court that the lower court's ruling was correct and should be upheld.

In summary, the party who lost in the lower court and initiates the first appeal is called the appellant. The appellant is responsible for filing the necessary documents and presenting arguments to persuade the higher court to review and potentially overturn the lower court's decision. The appellant's role is crucial in the appellate process as they seek to demonstrate errors made by the lower court and advocate for a favorable outcome.

Learn more about appellant here

https://brainly.com/question/30841160

#SPJ11

The decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards is the lexicographic decision rule.

Lexicographic decision rule is a type of decision rule that establishes minimum required performance standards for each evaluative criterion and selects the first or all brands that meet or exceed these minimum standards.

The decision rule is often used in situations where a company is seeking to make a decision among a number of options that are all acceptable, but which differ in terms of their performance levels on various evaluative criteria.

In the lexicographic decision rule, the decision maker sets a minimum standard for each criterion and selects the option that performs best on the most important criterion, without considering the performance levels of the other criteria.

If there is a tie, the decision maker moves to the second most important criterion and selects the option that performs best on that criterion, and so on, until a decision is made. This rule is also known as the priority rule or the lexicographic ordering rule.

To know more about lexicographic decision rule, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29839779#

#SPJ11

The state statute prohibiting marijuana stores from engaging in any and all kinds of advertising would likely be found to be valid as an exercise of police power.

It is generally accepted that the states have the authority to enact laws to protect public health, safety, and welfare, and this kind of statute could be found to be within the bounds of the police power to protect the public from the dangers of cannabis use. However, if the law was found to be an unreasonable restriction of free speech, it may be found to be invalid on those grounds.

Additionally, it may be challenged as an invalid restriction under the Commerce Clause, depending on the facts and circumstances. Since alcohol is illegal for minors, the statute would likely be considered valid in that application.

To know more about cannabis , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/32488101

#SPJ4

Answer:

No, the court will not return the $2500 back to Strickland but rather, the money has been forfeited to the government due to the circumstances around it.

Since the money was a bribe offered, it is within the view of the government to withheld the money as evidence as well as take the money due to the illegal purpose it tends to actualize when it was offered.

Explanation:

Non-existent extradition agreements between two countries can enable a cyber-criminal operating across borders to evade prosecution.

Extradition is the legal process through which one country surrenders an individual to another country for prosecution or punishment. It allows for the transfer of accused individuals from one jurisdiction to another to face criminal charges. However, in the absence of an extradition agreement between two countries, there is no legal framework to facilitate the extradition process.

For a cyber-criminal operating across borders, the lack of an extradition agreement can provide a safe haven, as they cannot be easily extradited to a country where they committed the crime. This can hinder international cooperation and make it challenging for law enforcement agencies to bring the cyber-criminal to justice.

Without an extradition agreement, the country where the cyber-criminal is residing may not be obligated to hand them over for prosecution, effectively allowing them to evade prosecution and continue their illegal activities.

The absence of extradition agreements between two countries can create loopholes that enable cyber-criminals operating across borders to evade prosecution. International cooperation and the establishment of extradition agreements are crucial in addressing cybercrime and ensuring that offenders are held accountable.

Learn more about law at:

brainly.com/question/820417

#SPJ11

Answer:

no

Explanation:

nor can relgious people.Most general insurance plans do not cover acts of god.

Answer:

no they will not do in that way hope it's helpful to you and Mark me as brainlist

Answer:

paralegals perform tasks such as conducting legal and factual research, drafting court documents and correspondence, reviewing and summarizing records, filing documents with the court, maintaining files, and. communicating with clients.

Answer:

An agent’s authority can be terminated at any time. If the trust between the agent and the principal has broken down, it is not reasonable to allow the principal to remain at risk in any transactions that the agent might conclude during a period of notice.

Agency can be terminated by the following ways:

By Agreement

On the basis that agency relationship is created by agreement between the principal and the agent, such a relationship can also be brought to an end by mutual agreement between the parties, either in writing or orally.

Termination by agreement may also occur if the agency relationship is terminated pursuant to the provisions of the agreement itself. The following situations may arise in this context:

If the agreement provides for the appointment of the agent for a specified period of time, the agency will come to an end automatically when that period of time expires.

If the agreement provides for the agency to terminate upon the occurrence of a specified event, the agency will come to an end upon the happening of the specified event.

By The Act Of Parties

An agency may be terminated by the acts of either the principal or the agent as illustrated below:-

Performance by the agent

If an agent is appointed to accomplish a particular task or for a specific purpose, when the task is accomplished by the agent or the specific purpose is attained, the agency will terminate.

Revocation by the principal

The authority of an agent may be revoked at any time by the principal. However unilateral revocation otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the agency agreement may render the principal liable to the agent for the breach of an agency agreement.

Any word or conduct of the principal inconsistent with the continued exercise of the authority by the agent may operate as a revocation of the agency.

Revocation’s of the agent’s power by the principal may not automatically discharge the principal from liability to a third party who is entitled to rely from liability to a third party who is entitled to rely from liability to a third party who is entitled to rely from liability to a third party who is entitled to rely on the apparent authority of the agent on ground’s of representation by the principal of previous course of dealing with the agent’s before notice of revocation is given to the third party. Therefore notice of revocation of an agent’s power should be given to the third party as soon as possible.

Renunciation by agent

An agent is entitled to renounce his power by refusing to act or by notifying the principal that he will not act for the principal.

Unilateral termination of the agency by the agent before he has fulfilled the obligations to the principal under the agency agreement will render the agent liable to the principal for the breach of the agency agreement such as payment of damages for the loss suffered by the principal.

By Notice

If the agency agreement provides that the agency may be terminated upon either party serving on the other written notice of a specified duration.

However, if the agency agreement does not contain any termination provision, the general rule is that reasonable notice has to be given to the other party to terminate the agency.

By Operation Of Law:-

An agency may terminate by the operation of law upon the occurrence of particular events:-

Where the party concerned is an individual:

By death

By insanity

By bankruptcy

Where the party concerned is a limited company:

Winding up

Receivership

The frustration of the contract of agency.

Agency

Section 182 of the Indian contracts act 1872, defines Agent & Principal: an agent is a person employed to do any act for another or to represent another in dealings with the third parties. The person for whom such act is done, or who is represented, is called the principal. Agency is the relationship that subsists between the principal and the agent, who has been authorised to act for him or represent him in dealing with others. Thus, in an agency, there is in effect two contracts i.e.

a) Made between the principal and the agent from which the agent derives his authority to act for and on behalf of the principal, and

b) Made between the principal and the third party through the work of the agent.

Any person, who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is of sound mind, can employ an Agent. As between Principal and third person a person may become an Agent, so as to be responsible to his Principal according to the provisions contained in the Act. No consideration is necessary to create an agency[iii]. Several types of commercial agents have been recognized under Indian law, which includes inter alia brokers, auctioneers, del credere agents, persons entrusted with money for obtaining sales and insurance agents.

The judicial powers of the State are vested in the Supreme Court, the nation's highest court. Lower federal courts exist, although they are not officially established by the Constitution.

Instead, Congress created them within Constitutional authority after concluding that they were required. The Supreme Court has judicial power over "all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution" according to Section 2 of Article III, which means that the court's primary duty is to determine whether or not legislation is valid. Among the various types of cases, it handles include those involving ambassadors, those involving admiralty and marine jurisdiction, and disputes between two or more nations. Legal disputes that reach the Supreme Court often include questions of statutory construction, constitutionality, and/or their respective statutes' applicability. Judicial review is the procedure through which it may be determined whether or not a statute is in accordance with the Constitution. The judicial branch relies on this procedure to ensure that the legislative and executive branches are subject to appropriate checks and balances. In the absence of a written constitution, courts rely on their implicit authority to conduct judicial review. In a landmark decision from 1803, the Supreme Court established its inherent authority to conduct judicial review in the case of Marbury v. Madison.

Learn more about the judicial review at:

brainly.com/question/14027482

#SPJ4

Answer: False

Explanation:

An Appeals Court Judge is a Federal Judge which means they have to be nominated by the President and approved by the Senate. The requirements to be nominated however, are not very stringent.

A nominee for instance, does not even have to hold a law degree talk more of having been a practicing attorney. Although informal criteria exists, they do not revolve around an individual having been a practicing attorney so this statement is false.

Nationalism is an idea and movement that holds that the nation should be congruent with the state. As a movement, nationalism tends to promote the interests of a particular nation (as in a group of people), especially with the aim of gaining and maintaining the nation's sovereignty (self-governance) over its homeland.

Nationalism is the belief that your own country is better than all others. Sometimes nationalism makes people not want to work with other countries to solve shared problems. Patriotism is a healthy pride in your country that brings about feelings of loyalty and a desire to help other citizens.