Under Rule 803(16) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, statements in ancient documents are considered to be exceptions to the hearsay rule.
To be admissible as evidence under 803(16), the statement must be made in a document that is at least 20 years old, and it must be shown that the document was produced before the time of trial. The statement must also be relevant to the case and have some probative value, meaning it must be able to prove or disprove a fact at issue in the case.
Overall, Rule 803(16) provides an exception to the hearsay rule that allows statements made in ancient documents to be admitted into evidence if they meet certain requirements. This can be particularly useful in cases where there is no other direct evidence available, as these documents can provide valuable insights into past events and the people who were involved in them.
Learn More About Statements
https://brainly.com/question/1041998
#SPJ11
Courts are very reluctant to grant _____ and will do so only when monetary damages simply are not adequate, typically because the subject matter of the contract is unique.
Answer:
Specific Preformance
Exceptions to the doctrine of subrogation
A waiver of subrogation is a contractual provision that prohibits insurers from seeking redress from a negligent third party.
The doctrine of subrogation does not put an end to the rights and duties of the insured. It only allows the insurer to recover the claims paid by it to the insured from the third party. The insurer continues to enjoy the right to proceed with legal actions against the wrong-doer.
Top Three Reasons Subrogation and Arbitration Processes...
Incorrect Personnel.
Inefficient Processes.
Lack of Corporate Strategic Support.
The principle of subrogation does not apply to life and personal accident policies because these policies are independent of indemnity. The doctrine applies only to marine, fire and other non-life policies.
can u be forced to retain 9th grade?
Which conflict would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics?
Family members disagree over division of responsibility for household chores.
A teen breaks a neighbor's fence panel while practicing archery.
A student and teacher disagree on the final course grade earned.
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
The conflict that would most likely be settled by law rather than ethics is: d. A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
What is conflict?Conflict can be defined as a form of disagreement that occur between two or more people. Conflict is what led to the development of conflict resolution as conflict resolution help to settle the disagreement the people that were involved in a conflict had .
The case that may be settle by the court of law is when a person damage or destroy another person property in which the person that commit the damage refuse to repair the damage, the owner of the property can sue the person in the law of court for damage which will be settle by the jury and if found guilty the person must pay for the damage.
Therefore the correct option is D.
Learn more about conflict here: https://brainly.com/question/25668660
#SPJ1
Answer:
A driver damages another car in a grocery store parking lot.
Explanation:
Got this right on the quiz! Although another choice might also be settled by law, this one is MOST LIKELY to be settled using law.
Drag each tile to the correct definition.
Tiles
law
policy
political authority
sovereignty
Pairs
Tiles
Pairs
basic principles of behavior
a rule that regulates actions
and behavior
-
the right to be free from
outside influence
-
-
the power to pass and enforce
laws
MacBook Air
Law is a system of rules created and enforced to regulate actions and behavior.
Policy is a basic principles of behavior.
Political authority is the power to pass and enforce laws.
Sovereignty is the right to be free from outside influence.
What is law?Law is a system of rules created and enforced to regulate actions and behavior.
Policy is a basic principles of behavior. Policy is a principle of action.
Political authority is the power to pass and enforce laws. Political authority claims the obedience to its rules.
Sovereignty is the right to be free from outside influence. Sovereignty refers to dominant power or supreme authority.
Find out more on law at: https://brainly.com/question/1091566
which group led the charge of the change to incarceration instead of corporal punishment
Answer:
The prison population began to grow in the 1970s, when politicians from both parties used fear and thinly veiled racial rhetoric to push increasingly punitive policies.
Explanation:
Chapter 3 discussion A*
Officer P, a university police officer, received information that a student living in a campus dormitory was selling drugs. This information was conveyed
to Officer P by an anonymous caller to the officer's cell phone. Officer P knew the suspect in question and had similar suspicions. Officer P
immediately went to the dormitory and stopped the student as he was leaving the building. Officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found
drugs.
Were these actions valid? Justify your answer.
anak and valid external courcer ARA in text citations and references are required. For full credit, you
Yes, Officer P's actions were valid. As officer P arrested him, searched his pockets, and found drugs.
What is validity?
Whether or whether the effects seen in a study are the result of manipulating the independent variable and not some other factor is referred to as internal validity.
In other words, the independent and dependent variables are causally related. Controlling irrelevant variables, employing uniform instructions, counterbalancing, removing demand features, and investigator effects can all help to increase internal validity.
The term "external validity" describes how broadly the findings of a study may be applied to different contexts, individuals, and historical periods.
By employing random selection to choose volunteers and conducting studies in a more natural environment, external validity can be increased. Simply put, face validity refers to whether the test seems to measure what it purports to. The simplest measure of validity is this one.
Learn more about validity, here
https://brainly.com/question/13012369
#SPJ1
Which statement correctly describes Arizona’s legislative branch? Check all that apply.
Statements that correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch are:
(B) The Senate consists of 30 senators.
(D) Any member may introduce legislation.
(E) Reps are chosen by the people of Arizona.
What is Arizona’s legislative branch?There are 60 members of the House of Representatives and 30 members of the Senate in the bicameral Arizona State Legislature.
Two House representatives and one senator represent each district.
The House of Representatives and the Senate are two distinct chambers or bodies that makeup Arizona's legislature, which is bicameral like all other States save Nebraska.
The Senate has 30 members, one from each district, and the House has 60 members, two from each Arizona Legislative District.
There are 30 senators in the Senate.
Legislation can be introduced by any member.
Arizonans vote for representatives.
Therefore, statements that correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch are:
(B) The Senate consists of 30 senators.
(D) Any member may introduce legislation.
(E) Reps are chosen by the people of Arizona.
Know more about Arizona’s legislative branch here:
https://brainly.com/question/10906824
#SPJ1
Complete question:
Which statements correctly describe Arizona’s legislative branch? Check all that apply.
a. The House is made up of 30 members.
b. The Senate is made up of 30 members.
c. The House has 16 standing committees.
d. All members can introduce legislation.
e. Members are elected by Arizona’s citizens.
Which is an example of discretionary spending?
A. Education
B. Social security
C.medicare
D.federal taxes
Describe two ways in which the Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 protects citizens against human trafficking
Answer:
The Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000 established methods of prosecuting traffickers, preventing human trafficking, and protecting victims and survivors of trafficking. The act establishes human trafficking and related offenses as federal crimes.
Explanation:
The two ways in which Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 :
By establishing program to protect the victims.By providing grant program.Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005Trafficking victims law reathourized act of 2005 play an important roles by making use of preventive measure that will help to reduce and stop the high rate of human trafficking.
The law founded a program that will help protect underage or minors who are victims of trafficking by rescuing them and to as well provide grant that will help the law enforcement agency to reduce human trafficking.
Therefore the ways in which Trafficking victims law reauthorized act of 2005 is: By establishing program to protect the victims.
Learn more about Trafficking victims here:https://brainly.com/question/1163922
#SPJ5
What is meant by a sworn police officer?
A. Sworn officers are members of the professional association of police officers.
B. Sworn police officers have been found in violation of the department's ethics policies because they have used inappropriate language.
C. These officers have taken an oath to respond to any call for assistance from a fellow officer immediately.
D. Sworn officers have taken an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States as well as in may jurisdiction, the constitution of their state.
"What would not be a standard of proof that the plaintiff would
satisfy in a tort case?
- Beyond a reasonable doubt
- None of the choices are correct.
- Preponderance of the evidence
- Clear and convin"
In a tort action, the plaintiff would not need to prove their claims beyond a reasonable doubt. As a result, choice (A) is right.
A doubt that is grounded on logic and common sense rather than pure speculation is referred to be a reasonable doubt. It might result from a thorough and objective analysis of all the data or from a dearth of evidence.
Either the evidence is insufficient or there is a reasonable doubt, depending on the circumstances. When plaintiff you are not completely convinced of the defendant's guilt after weighing and analyzing all the evidence, there is reasonable doubt.
A defendant cannot be found guilty based on conjecture or supposition.
Learn more about reasonable doubt, from :
brainly.com/question/29986194
#SPJ4
Which of the following sanctions are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party be in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed? Group of answer choices Compensatory damages Liquidation damages Punitive damages Incidental damages Exemplary damages
The sanction that is awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed is compensatory damages.
Compensatory damages are the payment given by one party to another to compensate for any losses or damages that may have occurred as a result of a breach of contract. Compensatory damages are the most common form of damages awarded for a breach of contract. The main objective of compensatory damages is to ensure that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed. This means that the damages awarded should compensate the aggrieved party for any losses they have suffered as a result of the breach of contract.
Compensatory damages can be awarded for various types of losses, including direct damages, incidental damages, and consequential damages. The damages awarded will vary depending on the type of loss suffered and the terms of the contract. In order to recover compensatory damages, the aggrieved party must prove that they have suffered a loss as a result of the breach of contract and that the loss is measurable in monetary terms.
In conclusion, compensatory damages are awarded with the objective of ensuring that a party is in as good a position as he or she would have been in had the contract been performed.
Learn more about compensatory damages: https://brainly.com/question/4395083
#SPJ11
Select the correct answer. What is the primary purpose of a political action committee?.
within the united states of America, a political action committee (p.c) is a 527 business enterprise that swimming pools campaign contributions from members and donates the budget to campaigns for or against candidates, poll projects, or the law.
Technically called "impartial expenditure-only committees," exceptional % may additionally increase unlimited sums of cash from businesses, unions, associations, and people, then spend limitless sums to overtly propose for or against political applicants.
Political hobby is interest directed towards the achievement or failure of a political celebration, candidate for partisan political office, or partisan political institution. The statute incorporates severe penalties which include removal from federal employment.
Maximum personnel is loose to take part in the following types of activities: campaigning for or in opposition to applicants in partisan elections, distributing campaign fabric, organizing or dealing with political rallies or meetings, circulating nominating petitions, running to register citizens, and making marketing campaign speeches.
Learn more about political action committees here:
https://brainly.com/question/2562059
#SPJ4
To maintain ballot status in Texas a third party must garner atleast of the vote in any of the five previous statewide elections
Answer:
5.0
Explanation:
the parent or guardian who signed the application for a provisional license may request to have the license canceled at any time and for any reason.
Yes, the parent or guardian who signed the application for a provisional license can request its cancellation at any time and for any reason.
Provisional licenses are usually issued to young drivers who have not yet gained full driving privileges. As such, the parent or guardian who co-signed the application plays a significant role in the driver's licensing process.
They have the authority to request the cancellation of the provisional license if they believe it is in the best interest of the young driver or due to other concerns.
A parent or guardian has the right to request the cancellation of a provisional license that they co-signed, ensuring the safety and well-being of the young driver and others on the road.
For more information on provisional license kindly visit to
https://brainly.com/question/28318275
#SPJ11
How should we evaluate a candidate's performance in a debate?
Answer:
A political debate is a confrontation of ideas between two or more candidates for a certain position, where both try to convince the electorate to vote for them. Electoral debates, such as the one recently held between President Trump, candidate of the Republican Party, and Joe Biden, candidate of the Democratic Party, are especially important.
To determine who is the candidate who has best developed his performance in the debate, the power of conviction that this has had in front of the voters must be evaluated, as well as the dominance of the debated topics and, especially, his prevalence against the other candidate on the discussed issues.
The performance of a candidate in a debate can be evaluated based on the power of conviction and the dominance that a candidate has over others.
Debate refers to the formal discussion regarding a particular issue in a legislative assembly or in a public meeting.In a debate, the arguments of the opposition will be put forward and can end with a vote. It should be noted that a political debate occurs between the candidates who want to hold certain political post whereby they're give their ideas and convince the people to vote for them.In conclusion, the performance of a candidate can be evaluated based on how much candidate was able to convince the electorates.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/13674408
1. After the passage of the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments, African Americans continued to experience political and economic oppression mainly because
A. the amendments were not intended to solve their problems
B. many African Americans distrusted the federal government
C. Southern states enacted Jim Crow laws
D. poor communications kept people from learning about their legal rights
2. Sierra stands in line at her polling place to vote in the election. She is happy that women were granted the right to vote so she can voice her opinion thanks to this amendment!
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
3. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. to give women the right to vote
B. to allow the Confederate States to re-enter the Union
C. to give African Americans the right to vote
D. to abolish slavery
4. What was the purpose of the 13th amendment to the Constitution?
A. It freed the slaves
B. It led to less segregation
C. It led to more segregation
D. It gave equal protection of the law
5. What was the primary reason for the ratification of the 14th Amendment in 1868?
A. to make slavery illegal in the United States
B. to uphold the legality of "separate but equal"
C. to guarantee citizenship rights to African Americans
D. to allow former Confederate officials to hold public office
6. After the Civil War, the purpose of adding the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to the Constitution was to
A. expand educational opportunities for African American men
B. allow women to become full citizens
C. guarantee African Americans equal treatment under the law
D. extend constitutional rights to new territories
7. What was the purpose of the 15th amendment ratified in 1870?
A. to establish a federal income tax
B. to give African American males the right to vote
C. to give women the right to vote
D. to officially end the "Reconstruction Era"
8. John is struggling to pay his bills since he got hurt at work. He is thankful that when he goes to vote in the next election, he doesn’t have to pay a poll tax thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
9. Damian just turned 18 years old. He can’t wait to cast his vote for the first time in the election this year thanks to this amendment.
A. 15th Amendment
B. 19th Amendment
C. 24th Amendment
D. 26th Amendment
10. The Plessy v. Ferguson decision and the concept of “separate, but equal” thinking was overturned by what follow-up case in 1954?
A. Marbury v. Madison
B. Tinker v. Des Moines
C. Worcester v. Georgia
D. Brown v. Board of Education
Answer:
1. C
2. B
3. D
4. A
5. C
6. C
7. B
8. C
9. A
10. D
Explanation:
Hunter is seventeen years old. Under the fair labor standards act, hunter cannot work.
Answer:
Hello user. I don't believe you are in college so I wont be giving you a college-worthy response. What exactly is your question? This is a statement, not a question.
also referred to as shock probation, ___________________ is when the offender is sentenced to a specific amount of time in prison or jail, to be followed immediately by a period of probation.
Also referred to as shock probation, "split sentencing." is when the offender is sentenced to a specific amount of time in prison or jail, to be followed immediately by a period of probation.
What is split sentencing?
Split sentencing is also referred to as shock probation because it can be a jarring experience for the offender to be released from prison only to be immediately placed on probation.
This type of sentencing is designed to allow offenders to serve some time behind bars while also providing them with an opportunity to reintegrate into society under the supervision of a probation officer.
Split sentencing is commonly used for non-violent offenders who are considered low-risk and can benefit from the structure and support provided by probation.
Hence, the right answer is split sentencing.
Read more about Probation at https://brainly.com/question/3344075
#SPJ11
Describe three factors that comtributes to financial crime
Financial Incentives, Weak Regulatory Frameworks and Technological Advancements are three factors that comtributes to financial crime.
Three factors that contribute to financial crime are:
Financial Incentives: The potential for financial gain is a significant motivating factor for individuals or organized groups to engage in financial crimes. This can include activities such as fraud, money laundering, embezzlement, or insider trading. The allure of illicit profits, whether through theft, manipulation, or illegal transactions, entices individuals to engage in unlawful activities.
Weak Regulatory Frameworks: Inadequate or weak regulatory frameworks create loopholes and opportunities for financial crime. Insufficient oversight, lax enforcement, and gaps in legislation can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system. This includes inadequate know-your-customer (KYC) procedures, insufficient monitoring of transactions, and limited regulatory supervision, which can facilitate money laundering, terrorist financing, or other illicit financial activities.
Technological Advancements: While technological advancements have brought numerous benefits to the financial industry, they have also opened new avenues for financial crime. The rapid growth of digital transactions, online banking, and cryptocurrencies has created opportunities for cybercrime, identity theft, and hacking. Criminals leverage technology to carry out sophisticated fraud schemes, phishing attacks, and data breaches, exploiting vulnerabilities in systems and networks.
These factors highlight the importance of robust regulations, effective enforcement mechanisms, and technological safeguards to combat financial crime. It requires a comprehensive approach involving collaboration between financial institutions, law enforcement agencies, regulatory bodies, and international cooperation to mitigate the risks associated with financial crime and protect the integrity of the financial system.
To know more about Financial crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/31388410
#SPJ11
Job is convinced that if he could only have the opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judging the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent.
true/false
The given statement, "Job is convinced that if he could be given opportunity to present his case to God, then God would realize he is judged the wrong man, and Job would be proclaimed innocent," is True.
God believes Job is humble and devout. Satan, however, challenges God, saying that Job is virtuous and moral only because God blessed him with good fortune.
Satan bets God that if Job experiences suffering, his devotion will falter, and he will curse God. However, after a series of disasters strike Job, he still does not curse God. But when he is struck with a horrible skin disease. Three of Job's friends arrive to comfort him, and Job finally questions the injustice done to him.
His friends entice him to challenge God's will. They suggest that his misfortune is probably a result of some sin he committed. Job replies that, 'he is innocent and pleads for a fair hearing from God.'
For more details on the Book of Job, visit: https://brainly.com/question/20379041
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements about common law are not true? (Select all that apply
Common few refers to the fact that judges can only look at written taw to make a decision
Common law evokes in part based on decisions in court cases
Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.
Common law means that only written bws can be interpreted by judges.
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process
Answer:
2 & 3 I think
Explanation:
The statements about common law are not true is
Common law is the belief that all citizens must follow due process.Common law means that laws can change based on prevailing behaviors and trends.What is Law?A law is referred to as a set of rules and regulations, guidelines given in the constitution and implemented by the ruling government to maintain cordial relationships among people and helps to conduct the functioning of any country properly.
The set of decisions created by judges and legal procedures starting in the Middle Ages is known as common law. there was not a codified system of laws, instead that there were historical policies and procedures that guided current legal choices.
This method of approaching the law is still employed by the American legal system, which uses earlier cases to guide present-day judgments.
Learn more about Common Law, here:
https://brainly.com/question/8476406
#SPJ2
Como as palavras estão organizadas nas estrofes?como são as letras que compõem o poema?
Olá. Primeiramente, é importante ressaltar que você não pode postar perguntas em português fora do campo "World Languagens". Esse não é o servidor brasileiro e sim o americano, por isso perguntas em português s´´o podem ser respondidas dessa forma.
Em segundo lugar, você não apresentou nenhum texto, o que dificulta que a sua pergunta seja respondida. Entretanto, eu posso te ajudar, afirmando que dentro das estrofes de um poema, as palavras sãpo organizadas em versos. O conjunto de versos, forma uma estrofe.
Em relação as letras, só é possivel determinar com elas são, depois que a leitura do texto for feita, mas podemos afirmar que na maioria dos casos, as letras maiusculas são usadas apenas no inivio do verso, enquanto as letras minusculas são usadas em todos os versos.
Trace the different individual who served as National director of public prosecution since 1994 and their relationship
The List of people who have served as National Directors are:
Bulelani Ngcuka Silas Ramaite Vusi PikoliMokotedi Mpshe Menzi Simelane Nomgcobo JibaMxolisi NxasanaShaun AbrahamsSilas Ramaite (acting)Shamila BatohiWhat is the National Prosecuting Authority?The National Prosecution Authority (NPA) is known to be an organization that was said to be set up by the South African government.
It is known to be a body that is responsible for any kind of state prosecutions. The NPA has been mandated to carry out criminal proceedings on behalf of the state.
Learn more about National Directors from
https://brainly.com/question/558426
ALAP
What is law really
before disclosing your personal information to a website, you should review this legal document that discloses some or all of the ways they gather, use, disclose, and manage your data.
Based on law, and standard regulations, the Privacy Policy is the legal document that discloses some or all of the ways the website gather, uses, discloses, and manages your data.
What is a Privacy PolicyPrivacy Policy is a term that is used to describe the statement or legal document (in privacy law) that divulges some or all of the ways a party gathers, uses, discloses, and manages a customer or client's data.
Generally, Privacy Policies are used on the website and sometimes placed under the Terms and Conditions of the website. It is the document that describes how the information provided by the user would be utilized.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is the Privacy Policy.
Learn more about the Privacy Policy here: https://brainly.com/question/13141069
#SPJ1
which of the following is not a basis for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant in a child support case
A) The nonresident has traveled through the state on many occasions
B) In the past, the nonresident had sexual intercourse in the state and the child may have been conceived by that act.
C) In the past, the nonresident resided with the child in the state
D) The nonresident is personally served within the state
Answer:
a
Explanation: it makes sense
how political parties are the group of people explain with example
Answer:Today, America is a multi-party system. The Democratic Party and the Republican Party are the most powerful. Yet other parties, such as the Reform, Libertarian, Socialist, Natural Law, Constitution, and Green Parties can promote candidates in a presidential election.
Explanation: sorry it is late
david entered into a contract to sell ruth a parcel of land fully aware that ruth's intention of the purchase was to construct a high-rise commercial building. david was also aware that the subsurface soil condition of the property would prevent such construction. the soil condition was not readily discoverable in the course of normal inspections or soil evaluations. david did not disclose the existence of the condition to ruth, nor did ruth make any inquiry of david as to the suitability of the land for the intended development. david's silence as to the soil condition: a. renders the contract voidable at ruth's discretion. b. does not affect the validity of the contract. c. entitles ruth only to monetary damages. d. makes the contract a case of a mu
David's silence as to the soil condition renders the contract voidable at ruth's discretion. The correct answer is option c.
David's silence regarding the subsurface soil condition, despite being aware of it and knowing that it would prevent the construction of a high-rise commercial building, can be seen as a form of fraudulent misrepresentation.
By failing to disclose the condition to Ruth, David withheld important information that could have influenced Ruth's decision to enter into the contract.
In this scenario, Ruth was not aware of the soil condition and did not make any inquiries about it. Therefore, David had a duty to disclose the information since it was not readily discoverable through normal inspections or evaluations.
Ruth has the right to consider the contract voidable, meaning she can choose to proceed with the contract or rescind it due to the fraudulent misrepresentation by David.
The correct answer is option c.
To know more about contract refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/2669219
#SPJ11