Answers
A privilege is a legal right that allows a witness to refuse to testify in court and not be held in contempt, under certain circumstances.
Under Federal Rule of Evidence 804(a)(1), a witness is considered "unavailable" if they invoke a privilege that prohibits them from testifying. Privileges can arise from various sources, including the Constitution, statutes, and common law.
Some common privileges include the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination, the attorney-client privilege, the spousal privilege, and the physician-patient privilege.
When a witness asserts a privilege, they are essentially claiming that their testimony would implicate them in illegal activity or violate a duty of confidentiality. As a result, the court cannot force them to testify, and their unavailability may impact the admissibility of evidence or the outcome of the case.
For more questions like Federal Rule click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28592086
#SPJ11
Related Questions
What do all three branches of the justice system have in common?
Answers
Answer: Law Enforcement.
Courts.
Corrections.
A set of statutes that apply to those serving in the armed forces of the United States.
Answers
Answer:
Unless specifically approved by the Constitution or an act of Congress, the Posse Comitatus Act prohibits the willful use of any portion of the Army or Air Force to carry out the statute.
What is an arbitration decision called?
A. Judgment
B. Agreement
C. Award
D. Facilitator
Answers
Answer: C
Explanation:” This is like a judge's or jury's decision in a court case. Once the arbitrator decides that all of the parties' evidence and arguments have been presented, the arbitrator will close the hearings. Hope its right! Im pretty sure it is though
which article is related to Equality before law
Answers
Answer:
Article 14 guarantees to all persons equality before the law and equal protection of the laws.
Answer:
article 14
Explanation:
how does opportunity cost influence people in their decisions about exercise and diet?
Answers
Answer:
Hope this helps (O) _ (O)
Explanation:
Economics This lesson identifies the key princi- ples that guide economic analysis. It introduces students to the basic economic problems of scarce resources, unlimited wants, the need to choose among alternatives, the consequences of cost, and the importance of incen- tives. While noting that nothing of value is free, the les- son explains how voluntary trade helps to provide more goods and services. While today is important, people are forward-looking in the decisions they make.
Reasoning Economic reasoning proceeds from basic assumptions about human activity. This lesson introduces students to these basic assumptions and uses them to model economic reasoning about an issue. It shows students how to apply the assumptions in the case of what seems to be a mystery: Why would people who admire a trim, slender appearance in others choose to eat too much and be inactive?
By age 2, children __________. Select one: a. take turns in face-to-face interaction b. can infer a speaker's indirectly expressed intention c. adjust their speech to fit the age of their listeners d. adjust their speech to fit the social status of their listeners
Answers
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Because you cant expect a baby to talk to you face-to-face, and they won't do c or d either.
If two laws conflict with each other, the Court must decide on the operation of each. . . . [T]he Constitution . . . must govern the case to which they both apply. This passage describes the legal principle of . This principle says it is the Court's job to decide if actions are allowed by .
Answers
Answer: Judicial review, the Constitution
Explanation:
Just took the assignment
Ty
Answer:
a on the first blank and c or the constitution on the second one
Explanation:
Crimes against public order and morals
There a very large number of crimes that fall under this chapter. Most of these crimes are misdemeanors and inconsistently enforcement. Enforcement largely depends on political leaning and policing focus. For this discussion board answer the questions below. Remember to answer ALL parts of the questions to get credit.
1. Which public order crimes is the most important to enforces and why? Do you think the punishment for these crime is sufficient? Do you think they need to be enforced more? explain in detail.
2. Which public order crimes is the least important to enforces and why? Do you think the punishment for these crime is too much? Do you think they need to be enforced less? explain in detail
Answers
The most public order offenses to enforce are felonies that violate public order. They are supported by either a horrible intent, such as the intention to kill, or a grave consequence, such as the death, serious injury, or destruction of property.
What is public order ?The most public order offenses to enforce are felonies that violate public order. They are supported by either a horrible intent, such as the intention to kill, or a grave consequence, such as the death, serious injury, or destruction of property. Felons obtain the highest grade and can be punished in any way because they are the most serious crimes.
Yes, I do believe that the penalties for these crimes are adequate.
Yes, I agree that they should be more strictly enforced in order to deter criminality.
2. Because there is typically no justification for an arrest, prostitution is the public order violation that is least important to enforce.
No, They shouldn't, in my opinion, be less aggressively enforced because it's a criminal against.
No, I do not believe that they should be less strictly enforced simply because it is a crime against the body.
Why are public order violations important?Public order offenses, as their name implies, are crimes against upholding the peace in the community. These crimes frequently entail acts of public violence, intimidation, or property destruction. The police are able to keep the peace by committing public order offenses.
Acts that go against the social norms of morality and acceptable behavior are considered crimes against the public order. Moral principles form the foundation of the generally accepted notions of good and wrong.
Therefore Some of the most common types of offenses against public order include those involving narcotics, prostitution, unruly behavior, public intoxication, and other offences involving alcohol.
To learn more about public order violation refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/15852355
#SPJ4
how can class evidence become individual evidence.
Answers
Answer:
Class characteristics are not unique to a particular object but place the particular bit of evidence into a group of objects. Individual characteristics narrow down the evidence to a single, individual source. The type of handgun with which a victim is shot is a class characteristic.
Explanation:
I hope it helps you
Which of the following statements is/are correct regarding the Estimates Committee?
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
Answers
The Committee on Estimates is not an ad hoc committee but a standing committee of the Parliament. On the other hand, the Committee on Railway Convention is not a standing committee but an ad hoc committee of the Parliament. Therefore, the correct option (D)
The origin of this committee can be traced back to the pre-independence era to the standing finance committee set up in 1921.As mentioned in the then-finance minister John Mathai's speech presenting the 1950-51 budget, the first estimate committee in the post-independence era was formed in 1950 on his advice.The Estimate Committee had 25 members at first, but that number increased to 30 in 1956.It is a type of financial commitment in the constitution of India. It is one of the permanent standing committees. Hence, Statement 1 is not correct.All the 30 members are from Loksabha onlyRajya Sabha has no representation in this committee.Members are elected every year from amongst Lok Sabha members according to the principle of proportional representation by means of a single transferable vote. Thus all parties get due representation in the committee.Hence the correct statement D
Learn more about Rajya Sabha
https://brainly.com/question/17331973
#SPJ11
Full Question: Which of the following statements is/are correct?
1. Committee on Estimates is an ad hoc committee of the Parliament.
2. Committee on Railway Convention is a standing committee of the Parliament.
Select the correct answer using the code given below: 100 word
Choose the correct statements given below.
A
1 only
B
2 only
C
Both 1 and 2
D
Neither 1 nor 2
The statement that is correct regarding the Estimates Committee is:Both 1 and 2.What is the Estimates Committee?The Estimates Committee is one of the largest and most important parliamentary committees.
Its primary goal is to examine the estimates that the executive submits to Parliament each year and submit reports to the House. Members of Parliament examine the financial estimates made by the government in the budgets and take appropriate measures. Below are some correct statements regarding the Estimates Committee:The committee was first created in 1921 to examine the budget estimates. The committee is made up of thirty members, and the chairman is always a member of the opposition.
To know more about Estimates visit
https://brainly.com/question/33016179
#SPJ11
Use complete sentences and proper grammar. You must label your responses numerically (1-5).
Minimum of one page if possible
Explain why the South has the highest regional homicide rate.
Describe the nature of the victim-offender relationship for homicide.
Explain why the United States has a higher homicide rate than other industrial nations.
Explain why men commit most homicides and aggravated assaults.
Describe the types of robbers.
Answers
Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom.
What are the main factors that lead to crime?Crime impact from attachment and delinquent peers. Drug dependency may be the primary element separating offenders from people who commit crimes seldom. Family problems may be the primary cause of criminal involvement.The fundamental steps in a crime scene investigation include physical evidence identification, recording, appropriate collection, packing, preservation, and scene reconstruction.But there are significant regional variations in the legal age of criminal culpability. In North Carolina, the minimum age in the United States is just 6 years old, although other states have no minimum age at all (Cipriani, 2009).To learn more about Crime refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ1
Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and weighs 135 pounds, was denied the job because the company requires that all employees be at least 5'6" tall and weigh at least 150 pounds. Federal justifies this requirement on the basis that its drivers are frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries. Janet brings a course of action. Has Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act?
Answers
Answer:
Yes Federal Trucking violated the Civil Rights Act
Explanation:
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 frowns at any form of discrimination or conditions set up people or organizations which hinders any form of equal treatment of people. The weight and height criteria are unjust methods in determining work eligibility. Tests such as that of physical fitness and strength should instead be carried out on the applicants. The Federal Trucking should also ensure there are better working conditions to make the job of frequently forced to move heavy loads in making pickups and deliveries easier and less tedious.
Pros and cons of the death penalty
Answers
Answer:
cons: From 1976 to 3 February 2021, there were 1,529 executions, of which 1,349 were by lethal injection, 163 by electrocution, 11 by gas inhalation, 3 by hanging, and 3 by firing squad.
pros: no prison
Explanation:
ပရဟိတဆိုတာဘာလဲ ရည်ရွယ်ချက်ဖော်ပြပါ
Answers
Answer:
what do you want ?
Explanation:
Larry decides after all these years he wants to sell his prized Frontier Falcons Statue as he is now retired and is planning to move to Nebraska. He has proudly had it out front of his home to celebrate the Frontier Varsity Football teams State title from 1981. Larry posts the statue for sale on Craiglist and immediately gets responses from Western New Yorkers. One in particular named Jerry calls Larry and says "He I have driven by that statue for years and have loved it. I see you have it listed on Craigslist for $1200. You have a deal." Larry, excited says "sure". Jerry writes a check, puts it in the mail and its dated for January 18, 2021, the same day Jerry agrees and writes the check. On January 19, Larry gets another call from an interested person who says "Hey, I'll give you cash today for what your asking, what do you think?" And Larry says "Sure". What would happen.
2 points
Answers
Why do we have the right to 'Freedom from inhuman treatment '?
Answers
Which Amendment grants someone the right to sue another person in a court of law even in the absence of a crime being committed?
a.)Fifth
b.)Sixth
c.)Seventh
d.)Eighth
Answers
Answer:
answer of this question is Fifth
Explanation:
May this answer is helpful for you
How does the concept of privity of contract apply to this situation?
Answers
Answer:
sorry I need the points I got no answer
Which of the following is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case?
O It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts
O It may be the basis for establishing facts in a later civil case
O It will occur as a part of the trial portion of a criminal prosecution
O It is legally equivalent to a “no contest” plea
Answers
The one that is true regarding a guilty plea in a criminal case is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts. Hence, the correct answer is option A
A criminal case is the one that is liable to sentence punishment. A case that is punishable under law of any country. Hence, one is set to be in a criminal case when one is involved in any form of crime. The severity of the crime determines the gravity of the punishment.
What does guilty plea mean?To plead guilty implies that one accepts that one did the crime charged. If one pleads guilty, the court will decide what should happen next, which could be a fine or a prison sentence.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A. It operates as an admission of the charge only, not the underlying facts.
learn more about guilty plea: https://brainly.com/question/14334271
#SPJ1
How can experts match a bullet to a specific make or model of gun?
Answers
In recent decades, new justices have most commonly been
appointed from…
a. Lower federal courts
b. State supreme courts
c. Executive agencies
d. Academia
Answers
In recent decades, new justices have most commonly been appointed from: a. Lower federal courts.
This statement is correct. Over the past few decades, it has been more common for new justices to be appointed from lower federal courts. Many Supreme Court justices have previously served as judges in federal circuit courts or district courts before being nominated to the Supreme Court.
This pattern allows presidents to evaluate their judicial records and experience before considering them for the highest court in the land. However, it is important to note that justices have also been appointed from other backgrounds, including state supreme courts, executive agencies, and academia, but the trend of selecting justices from lower federal courts has been more prevalent in recent years.
To know more about federal court:
https://brainly.com/question/32812355
#SPJ4
Joan is a white-collar offender. She has been convicted of embezzlement and given a prison sentence. In terms of security levels, which type of prison should Joan be sent to
Answers
Answer:
Minimum security prisons. These violators are not at risk of violence therefore the security is comparatively low in terms of security than others.
Explanation:
John smith was born on January 1, 1965. Which customer listing is considered PII?
Answers
The correct answer for customer listing to be considered PII would be John Smith – DOB 1/1/1965.
What constitutes PII?Any representation of information that enables the identity of an individual to whom the information applies to be logically deduced by either direct or indirect means is referred to as personal identifiable information (PII).
What is PII, and what are some examples?PII refers to any data on a person kept by an organization, including (1) any details that can be used to identify or trace a person, including a name, social security number, birthdate, place of birth, mother's maiden name, or biometric data.
To know more about PII visit-
https://brainly.com/question/30023988
#SPJ1
Logistics ______ is a process whereby productivity and capability are increased through deliberate application of continuous process improvement.
Answers
Answer:
Transformation.
Explanation:
Supply chain management can be defined as the effective and efficient management of the flow of goods and services as well as all of the production processes involved in the transformation of raw materials into finished products that meet the insatiable want and need of the consumers. Generally, the supply chain management involves all the activities associated with planning, execution and supply of finished goods and services to the consumers.
The fundamental principle of supply chain management is the complete collaboration between multiple firms. These multiple firms include a company that is saddled with the responsibility of manufacturing producer), a wholesaler, and a retailer who typically sells the products to the customers or consumers.
Basically, these three (3) firms or individuals are required to collaborate with each other so as to meet the needs of the customers in a timely manner or fashion and at a fair price too.
Logistics transformation is a process whereby productivity and capability are increased through deliberate application of continuous process improvement.
The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of federal law and has both _______ and _______ jurisdiction.
Answers
The U.S. Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter of federal law and has both appellate and original jurisdiction.
Appellate jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear appeals from lower courts. In the case of the Supreme Court, it has the authority to hear appeals from federal appellate courts as well as state supreme courts, but only if the case involves a federal question or issue. This means that the case must involve a question of federal law or the United States Constitution.
Original jurisdiction, on the other hand, refers to the power of a court to hear a case for the first time, rather than on appeal. The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a limited number of cases, such as those involving disputes between states or cases in which a foreign ambassador is a party.
In addition to its role as the ultimate arbiter of federal law, the Supreme Court also plays an important role in interpreting the Constitution. Its decisions have far-reaching implications and can shape legal precedent for years to come. As such, it is often considered one of the most powerful institutions in the United States.
learn more about federal law here
https://brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ11
A family-owned organization, OMA (an acronym for the three-state region of Oklahoma, Missouri, and Arkansas) is one of the premier manufacturers of potato chips for the region. They are noted for producing a high-quality product, reasonable prices, and treating their employees fairly and equitably. They also enjoy a loyal customer base as is witnessed by the number of supermarket managers who report that many people will not buy any other brand of chips.
At a recent manufacturer’s convention, the caterer chose OMA’s potato chips as the chip of choice and served them each day. They also were available during the morning and afternoon break times. Because representatives from all 50 States participated in the convention, the word soon spread across the nation.
Within weeks of the close of the convention, orders began to arrive from outside the three-state region. Of course, the immediate reaction was to write polite refusal letters reaffirming the position of OMA as a small, regional organization. However, after six months, the company had received orders from all 50 States!
You are asked to form a team that will devise a plan of action.
Who will you assign to the team (Suggestion: Think both about people with titles and those without titles within the organization to serve on the team.)
The first item of business will be whether OMA will remain a regional organization or will it expand to become a national organization.
How will you apply the Six Thinking Hats Model to help make the decision?
Your application should explore advantages and disadvantages of both situations.
Answers
The people that will be assigned to the team include the sales and purchasing manager, members of the sales team, and the human resource manager.
How to illustrate the information?Based on the information given, it was stated that the company produces a high-quality product, reasonable prices, and treat their employees fairly and equitably.
Since there's an increase in order, the sales department, purchasing department, and the human resources department will be involved.
The human resources manager will be in charge of recruiting staffs into the sales department that will help in handling the increase in orders.
Furthermore, it's important for OMA to remain a regional organization and after the chips are well known internationally, it can expand to become a national organization.
The Six Thinking Hats Model can be applied to make the decision by rotating the groups in order to foster new ideas and enhance collaboration.
Learn more about sales on:
brainly.com/question/25586322
#SPJ1
Which of the following is a benefit of restoration justice, which the judge might have felt was valuable in Justin case?
Answers
Answer:
In simple words, Restorative justice refers to the legal strategy where one of the approaches to a case is to arrange a meeting between both the perpetrator including the complainant, often with members of the broader community.
Academic evaluation of restorative justice seems to be optimistic. Most findings indicate that it makes criminals less inclined to commit an offence. The 2007 research also indicates that it would have the greatest level of similar values and responsibility for any sort of justice.
well-defined property rights can lead to the better maintenance and care of a good. in which of the following scenarios would property rights (or lack thereof) lead individuals to fix the problem themselves and for which scenarios would they likely neglect the problem? inquizitive chapter 7
Answers
Well-defined property rights can play a crucial role in maintaining the upkeep and care of goods. When individuals have clear ownership over good, they have the incentive to maintain it and ensure its longevity. In scenarios where property rights are well-defined, individuals are more likely to take responsibility for maintaining the good because they benefit from its long-term use and value.
On the other hand, a lack of well-defined property rights can lead to neglect of a good. When no one has clear ownership over a good, individuals may not have the incentive to maintain it. This is because they do not stand to benefit from its upkeep or suffer the costs of its neglect.
For example, imagine a shared community garden where no one has clear ownership over the land. In this scenario, individuals may not take responsibility for maintaining the garden because they do not own it and do not benefit from its upkeep. However, if an individual or group owned the same garden, they would have the incentive to maintain it and ensure its productivity.
In conclusion, well-defined property rights can lead to better maintenance and care of a good, while a lack thereof can lead to neglect. It is important to have clear ownership over resources to ensure their proper use and upkeep.
To learn more about property rights, visit: https://brainly.com/question/9052855
#SPJ11
The Supreme Court considers diversity in education a "compelling state interest."
Answers
The Supreme Court has indeed recognized diversity in education as a "compelling state interest." In several landmark cases, the Court has held that universities may consider race and ethnicity as one of many factors in their admissions process in order to achieve a diverse student body.
In the case of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016), the Court reaffirmed this principle and held that a university's use of race in admissions must be narrowly tailored to achieve its compelling interest in diversity. The Court emphasized that diversity in education promotes cross-racial understanding, helps to break down racial stereotypes, and prepares students for an increasingly diverse workforce and society. However, the Court has also emphasized that the use of race in admissions must be subject to strict scrutiny and must be limited in scope. In particular, universities must demonstrate that they have exhausted race-neutral alternatives and that their use of race is necessary to achieve their compelling interest in diversity. Overall, the Supreme Court's recognition of diversity in education as a "compelling state interest" reflects the importance of promoting equal educational opportunities and preparing students for a diverse and interconnected world.
Learn more about Supreme Court here
https://brainly.com/question/18228641
#SPJ11
A provision of the supreme court ruling on the scott v. Sandford case was later overturned by.
Answers
A provision of the supreme court ruling on the Scott v. Sandford case was later overturned by the 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution.
What was important about the Supreme Court's ruling in Scott v Sandford?The ruling of the United States Supreme Court held that all African Americans, whether they were in slavery or not, lacked the ability to file a lawsuit in federal court since they were not citizens of the country. In deciding as it did, the Supreme Court also decided that the federal government could not forbid slavery in the territories.
The 13th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, which outlawed slavery and proclaimed all people born in the United States to be citizens, overturned the Scott v. Sandford ruling, which many legal scholars believe to be the worst decision ever made by the Supreme Court.
Learn more about Scott v Sandford here:
https://brainly.com/question/12359809
#SPJ4