When was tupac murdered...its for my history project...

Opinions on environmental issues vary in terms of conservation vs. exploitation, global vs. local perspectives, precautionary approach vs. risk management, and government regulation vs. market solutions.

Here are a few examples:

Conservation vs. Exploitation: Some individuals emphasize the importance of conservation and sustainability, arguing for the responsible use and preservation of natural resources. Others prioritize economic development and view resource exploitation as necessary for progress and human well-being.

Global vs. Local Perspectives: Some people focus on global environmental issues, such as climate change, advocating for international cooperation and collective action. On the other hand, others prioritize local environmental concerns, focusing on immediate impacts on their communities and emphasizing local solutions.

Precautionary Approach vs. Risk Management: There are differing opinions on how to address environmental risks. Some individuals advocate for a precautionary approach, urging action even in the face of uncertain scientific evidence to prevent potential harm. Others adopt a risk management perspective, seeking a balance between environmental protection and economic considerations, weighing the potential costs and benefits of different actions.

Government Regulation vs. Market Solutions: Opinions vary on the role of government and market mechanisms in addressing environmental issues. Some argue for stronger government regulations and policies to protect the environment and promote sustainable practices. Others favor market-based approaches, such as carbon pricing or emissions trading, to incentivize businesses and individuals to reduce their environmental impact.

By comparing and contrasting these points of view, it becomes evident that environmental issues are complex and multifaceted, requiring a balance between economic, social, and ecological considerations. Finding common ground and seeking innovative solutions that incorporate multiple perspectives is crucial for effective environmental stewardship.

For more questions on environmental issues

https://brainly.com/question/28211138

#SPJ11

Answer:

The Zhou created the Mandate of Heaven: the idea that there could be only one legitimate ruler of China at a time, and that this ruler had the blessing of the gods. They used this Mandate to justify their overthrow of the Shang, and their subsequent rule.

Explanation:

Democrats backed and Whigs opposed the Compromise of 1850. It declared that Northern states had a financial obligation to restore slaves to the South and that it was against the law to house any runaway slaves.

The Compromise of 1850 was a piece of legislation put up by Sen. Henry Clay of Kentucky, known as the "great compromiser," and approved by the U.S. Congress in an effort to resolve a number of unresolved slavery-related concerns and prevent the Union from dissolving. The act demanded the Fugitive Slave Act be changed, called for the elimination of the slave trade in Washington, DC.

Moreover, the act set a boundary between Texas and the United States, and urged for the admittance of California as a "free state." Although both sides benefited, it seemed that the north benefited the most. The free states now held a majority in the American Senate, despite California frequently siding with the south on numerous matters in the 1850s. In the end, the north refused to enforce it.

To learn more about Compromise of 1850, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/208206

#SPJ1

Answer:

Explanation: From the British point of view, it was only right that American colonists should pay their fair share of the costs for their own defense but because they opposed the taxes on the colonies it caused a very unbalanced economy because of this colonists couldn't pay enough money for taxes which also caused a very unbalanced government between Britain.

Hudson River School painters saw the untouched, wild American interior as the source of inspiration for a movement of settlement among the American people.

After Cole's untimely passing in 1848, the second generation of Hudson River School artists began to emerge. Frederic Edwin Church, John Frederick Kensett, and Sanford Robinson Gifford were among its prominent members. Luminism is frequently used to characterize the art of this second generation of painters. Among the founding members of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City were Kensett, Gifford, and Church. 

Between 1855 and 1875, the majority of the second generation's best paintings were created. Artists like Albert Bierstadt and Frederic Edwin Church were well-known during that era. Bierstadt studied there for several years Düsseldorf school of painting had an impact on both of them. To admire paintings, thousands of people would each pay 25 cents such as The Icebergs and Niagara.  These scenes' epic scale was unmatched in earlier American paintings and served to remind people of their nation's vast, untamed, and majestic wilderness areas. During this time, the American West was settled, national parks were preserved, and lush urban parks were created.

To know more about Hudson River School:

https://brainly.com/question/2669866

Hudson River School painters saw the untouched, wild American interior as the source of inspiration for a movement of in the American people exploration. Correct option is d.

​

The Hudson River School was a group of American landscape painters in the mid-19th century. They were known for their depictions of the American wilderness and landscapes, particularly those surrounding the Hudson River Valley and other areas in the northeastern United States. These painters believed that the untouched, wild American interior held great inspiration and beauty, which they sought to capture in their art.

The term "exploration" best fits the context of the sentence because it refers to the act of traveling and venturing into new and uncharted territories. The Hudson River School painters were exploring the American wilderness, finding new vistas and landscapes to inspire their artwork. Through their paintings, they conveyed a sense of wonder and appreciation for the natural world, which also resonated with the American people during a time of westward expansion and a growing sense of national identity.

To know more about Hudson River School:

https://brainly.com/question/29941317

#SPJ2

Answer: The correct answer is e) borrowing.

Explanation: Most of the money raised to finance World War II came through borrowing. Governments issued war bonds and borrowed funds from citizens, financial institutions, and other countries to cover the enormous costs of the war effort. This borrowing helped provide the necessary funds for military operations, production of war materials, and other war-related expenses. Tariff collections, excise taxes, raising income taxes, and voluntary contributions also played a role but were not the primary sources of financing for World War II.

Most of the money raised to finance World War II came through borrowing.

During World War II, governments around the world needed substantial funds to support their war efforts. One of the primary methods employed was borrowing money. Countries raised capital by issuing war bonds and other forms of government debt, essentially borrowing money from their citizens and foreign entities. These loans helped finance the massive expenses associated with mobilizing and equipping military forces, supporting war industries, and providing for the needs of soldiers and civilians. The borrowing was often facilitated through the sale of bonds and securities, which allowed individuals and institutions to invest in the war effort and earn interest on their investments. While other methods, such as income taxes and tariffs, also contributed to war financing, borrowing played a significant role in providing the necessary financial resources for countries engaged in World War II.

Learn more about World War II here:

https://brainly.com/question/2846580

#SPJ11

Cartesian Dualism became popular during the Renaissance period. This was a time of great intellectual and philosophical exploration, and the ideas of philosopher René Descartes became particularly influential during this time.

Descartes published his major works on dualism, including "Meditations on First Philosophy" and "The Principles of Philosophy," in the mid-17th century. These works were widely read and discussed during the Renaissance, and Cartesian Dualism became a prominent topic of debate among philosophers and intellectuals.

It's worth noting that Descartes himself was building on earlier philosophical ideas, including those of Plato and Aristotle. However, his specific formulation of dualism - which posits that the mind and body are separate entities - became particularly influential and has continued to shape philosophical thought to this day.

Learn more about Cartesian Dualism: https://brainly.com/question/31561030

#SPJ11

Answer:

No, to me the crusades (battle between the Muslims and Christians) has no worth. In the end, almost no one gained anything of worth from the Crusades. They diminished not only the Pope's credibility as a spiritual leader but also Europeans' hopes of expansion along with their general acceptance of cultural diversity. The Crusades are in many ways Europe's "lost weekend." The positive change after the war was the both had peace.

The statement that as President, Theodore Roosevelt was determined to break up every business trust he could find is true. Roosevelt believed that large trusts, such as those controlling the oil, steel, and railroad industries, were harmful to small businesses and consumers.

He believed that these trusts were able to manipulate prices and stifle competition, which ultimately led to decreased innovation and increased costs for consumers. Roosevelt's approach to trust-busting was a cornerstone of his presidency, and he became known as a champion of progressive reform. His administration filed dozens of lawsuits against major corporations and used the Sherman Antitrust Act to break up trusts and monopolies. While not all of his actions were successful, Roosevelt's efforts to regulate big business and promote competition helped shape the modern regulatory landscape. Overall, Roosevelt's anti-trust efforts represented a key part of his vision for a fairer and more equitable society.

Learn more about Sherman Antitrust Act here:

https://brainly.com/question/838791

#SPJ11

Appealing to many African Americans' anger and frustration over a lack of social and economic power, Malcolm X preached a militant approach to civil rights, in opposition to Dr. King's approach.

Malcolm X, born Malcolm Little and later known as El-Hajj Malik El-Shabazz, was a prominent figure in the Civil Rights Movement. He advocated for black empowerment, self-defense, and the rejection of nonviolence as a means of achieving civil rights. Unlike Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s philosophy of nonviolent protest and integration, Malcolm X promoted black nationalism, self-determination, and the importance of addressing social and economic inequalities within the black community.

Malcolm X's message resonated with many African Americans who were disillusioned with the slow progress of integration and the persistence of racial discrimination. He called for a more confrontational approach, highlighting the need for self-defense and the assertion of black identity and pride.

While Dr. King and Malcolm X shared the common goal of racial equality, their approaches differed significantly. Dr. King believed in peaceful protests, nonviolence, and integration as a means to achieve civil rights reforms. The two leaders represented distinct strategies within the broader struggle for civil rights, reflecting the diversity of perspectives and tactics within the movement.

To learn more about Malcolm X click here : brainly.com/question/12089711

#SPJ11

The old testament promises and covenants which are fulfilled in Luke 1 and 2 is the birth of Jesus, the Messiah of the world.

The New Testament proclaims that all God’s covenant promises are fulfiled in and through Jesus (Luke 1:54–55,69–75), the long-awaited Davidic Messiah (Luke 2:11). As the royal offspring of David (Luke 1:27,32–33; 2:4), Jesus also fulfills the role of Isaiah’s servant not only in redeeming Israel (Luke 2:38) but also by mediating God’s blessing to an international community of faith.

Therefore, the correct answer is as given above. the old testament promises and covenants which are fulfilled in Luke 1 and 2 is the birth of Jesus, the Messiah of the world and his lineage.

learn more about Luke 1 and 2: https://brainly.com/question/11363702

#SPJ1

The combination of various factors created a favorable environment for the increased interest in wind power technology during the early 1970s

Worldwide interest in wind power technology increased dramatically in the early 1970s due to several factors:

The oil crisis: The early 1970s saw a significant increase in oil prices and supply disruptions due to political events, such as the OPEC oil embargo. This led to a heightened awareness of the vulnerability of fossil fuel dependency and the need for alternative energy sources.

Environmental concerns: The 1970s marked a growing awareness of the environmental impacts of conventional energy sources, particularly fossil fuels. Concerns about air pollution, climate change, and the finite nature of fossil fuel resources prompted a search for cleaner and more sustainable energy alternatives.

Technological advancements: The early 1970s also witnessed notable advancements in wind turbine technology, such as improved designs, larger capacities, and increased efficiency. These advancements made wind power more viable and attractive as a renewable energy option.

Government support and policies: Many governments around the world recognized the potential of wind power and began implementing policies and incentives to promote its development. This included subsidies, tax credits, and feed-in tariffs, which encouraged investment and research in wind energy.

The combination of these factors created a favorable environment for the increased interest in wind power technology during the early 1970s. It marked the beginning of a global shift towards renewable energy sources and paved the way for the significant growth of wind power in subsequent decades.

To know more about climate change visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1789619

#SPJ11

Answer:

Macedonian phalanx.

Explanation:

The Macedonian phalanx was an infantry formation developed by Philip II from the classical Greek phalanx, of which the main innovation was the use of the sarissa, a 6-metre pike.

Answer:

Right to Speedy Trial

Explanation:

Answer:

people who are on trial in criminal court.

on edgen

Explanation:

Answer:

what are the options? you forgot to list them

There were many people who started to question the morality of slavery and whether or not it was truly ethical to hold another human being in bondage.

This created a shift in public opinion that eventually led to the abolition of slavery in the United States. The slave trade was a major source of labor for the agricultural economy of the South, and the expansion of plantation agriculture westward created a greater demand for slaves. However, as the moral arguments against slavery grew more vocal, the demand for slaves began to decline.

Many people began to see slavery as a violation of human rights and an affront to the principles of freedom and equality that the United States was founded on. In conclusion, Westward expansion created moral arguments that led to a decline in support for the slave trade in the United States.

As people began to question the morality of slavery and the principles of freedom and equality that the United States was founded on, the demand for slaves began to decline, eventually leading to the abolition of slavery.

Read more about morality of slavery here:https://brainly.com/question/30257790

#SPJ11

Answer:

C

Explanation:

loyalists were loyal to the English crown, so they would trust in the Government to protect them and their rights

hope this helps :)

Answer:

c

Explanation:

Answer:

He tells you to vote countless amounts of times. He also gives many offers like saying he will “eat human toenails” for you to vote, or “give you a dance”. It’s an entertaining commercial so I wouldn’t be concerned.

Explanation:

Hope this helps <3

The central message of the commercial is to vote for Barack Obama. The motivating factor is that Will Farrel says he will do anything. The viewer should not be concerned about who paid for the commercial because it states clearly it supports Obama, and doesn’t harm the other opponent.

Edg 2020

Answer:

PANDEMIC DISEASES

Explanation:

PANDEMC DISEASES

Answer:

a pandemic disease

Explanation:

Many Americans opposed the Vietnam War because of the opposition-centered idea and some people believed that it was an unjustified war.

The opposition centered itself around the idea of mandatory military forces which many considered unfair and unjust. Many drafted fighters were students who had to quit their education in order to fight. This may hit the nation's growth in the future era.

Opposition to this war was displayed in a variety of ways. Some Americans partook in anti-war rallies and protests, including the well-known March on the Pentagon in 1967. Others wrote notes to their elected representatives and signed petitions to stop the war.

To learn more about the Vietnam war

https://brainly.com/question/1749435

#SPJ4

The phrase "moral decay" is used to characterize the erosion or loss of a civilization's moral standards. The terms "moral degeneration" and "moral deterioration" are interchangeable.

Moral decadence lowers the bar for acceptable conduct and develops new, less stringent standards for justice and ethics. Simply put, moral or ethical behavior is no longer demanded of individuals. Society no longer expects its citizens to uphold their adherence to the most fundamental moral principles. Moral decay breeds cynicism in society as a whole. No longer do people hold one another to high standards. They no longer count on one another to be truthful.

People must adhere to new, lesser standards and moral conventions in this morally bankrupt society, yet this is hardly the worst aspect of the tale. People who are seeking to uphold their moral ideals do not wish to stand out from the crowd or exhibit differences in appearance.

They do not wish to defy morality because doing so will result in unemployment, social marginalization, isolation, and public humiliation. They aren't prepared to take on the system of moral decline and degradation. As a result, a society makes a morally irresponsible decision. It will eventually devolve into an immoral society, because societies can only flourish when moral evolution is ongoing.

To know more about, moral decadance, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/15610389

#SPJ4

In 1994, American attitudes toward homosexuality varied, reflecting a diversity of opinions and beliefs within the population. Generally, the prevailing attitudes tended to be less accepting and more conservative compared to present-day perspectives.

At that time, homosexuality was still a highly stigmatized and controversial topic. The majority of Americans held negative views or were uncomfortable with homosexuality, with many considering it morally wrong or deviant. LGBTQ+ rights and visibility were limited, and societal acceptance of same-sex relationships was relatively low.

Public opinion regarding same-sex marriage, adoption by same-sex couples, and LGBTQ+ rights in general was significantly more conservative than it is today. There were limited legal protections for LGBTQ+ individuals, and discrimination based on sexual orientation was not widely recognized or addressed by legislation.

It is important to note that these attitudes varied across different regions, demographics, and cultural contexts within the United States. Over the years, attitudes toward homosexuality have shifted significantly, with increasing acceptance and support for LGBTQ+ rights becoming more prevalent in society.

To know more about homosexuality refer  here

brainly.com/question/4411646#

#SPJ11

The moon landing of 1969 caused increased technological innovation, and national pride, and improved global perception of the United States, impacting American standards of living and foreign relations.

The moon landing of 1969, achieved through NASA's Apollo 11 mission, had profound effects on American society. Firstly, it stimulated technological advancements and scientific research, which in turn led to improvements in various industries such as telecommunications, computing, and materials science. These advancements contributed to the growth of the American economy and enhanced standards of living.

Secondly, the moon landing boosted national pride and unity as Americans celebrated the achievement of landing humans on the moon. This accomplishment showcased American technological and engineering capabilities, reaffirming the country's position as a global leader in innovation.

In terms of foreign relations, the moon landing had a positive impact on America's standing in the world. It demonstrated American scientific and technological superiority, enhancing the country's international reputation. It also served as a symbol of American exceptionalism and showcased the United States as a leader in space exploration, contributing to soft power diplomacy and fostering goodwill among nations.

Overall, the moon landing of 1969 significantly impacted American standards of living by driving technological advancements and fostering national pride. It also positively influenced American foreign relations by bolstering the country's global reputation and showcasing its scientific and technological prowess.

Learn more about  foreign relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/29759079

#SPJ11

Answer:

true

Explanation:

About 19% of kamikaze attacks were successful.

Answer: The United States was a phenomenal success at containing communism after 1945, as long as one considers success as not falling to communism itself. I maintain, however, that the measure of success we should expect is the quarantine of communism to its’ component initial member, the Soviet Union. But in the years after World War II to the age of the Nixon presidency, the US failed to stop the expansion of communism to any efficiency. The whole of Eastern Europe fell to communism. The most populous nation on Earth, China, also went communist indirectly taking with it N. Korea and Vietnam, and making the countries of Cambodia and Laos quasi-communist. The United States even gained a communist satellite 90 miles out of its’ boundaries, Cuba. It is clear that American foreign policy with its’ banner of containment was a miserable failure. The end of World War II brought the redrawing of boundaries all over the world. Korea, conquered by Japan during the war, was divided at the 38th parallel then given to the USSR in the north and the US in the south. The Soviets pulled out of N. Korea in 1950, leaving a communist regime behind. That regime, funded and equipped by The Peoples Republic of China, invaded S. Korea. The United Nations (led, of course, by the United States) raised an army to restore peace and expel the aggressors. The “conflict” lasted three years and victory changed hands twice before the bloodied United States established a cease-fire zone on the familiar 38th parallel. Some might say that communism in this case was successfully contained, however, the loss of 53,000 American lives in a fruitless attempt to topple a regime is hardly a victory. A similar yet more gruesome failure of the United States would materialize in Vietnam. Vietnam declared independence from France in 1945, which the French did not recognize. A war broke and after 8 years of fighting the decision came in 1954 to split the country in two, North Vietnam being Communist and South Vietnam led by the Vietnamese who supported the French. Diem, the South Vietnamese leader was assassinated in 1963, causing the U.S. to send over American troops to try to support the non-Communist regime in the South, in accordance with the Truman Doctrine. The consequent struggle would prove to be the most agonizing and long defeat of the American military in history. Fighting a traditional war in a guerrilla setting and the insistence that we could win the war without popular support of the South Vietnamese were two key elements of our failure. The United States suffered 68,000 dead along with 400,000 S. Vietnamese allies. It was 1973 when we first started to withdraw our troops, and in 1976, all of Vietnam came under rule by the Communist North. Later, Vietnam would occupy Laos and Cambodia in part of an Asian Soviet bloc.