which kind of judicial decision-making acknowledges the power of judges to promote new social policy by overturning precedent?

Battery is an act that intentionally or recklessly causes harmful or offensive contact with another person.

The act of swinging the club behind the instructor was a show of annoyance and was not meant to make physical contact with the instructor. Unfortunately, the club slipped from the golfer's hands and hit the instructor in the head, causing injury. Even though it was an accident, it is still considered a battery because it was an intentional act. Therefore, the instructor will most likely recover if he brings a battery action against the golfer.

The golfer may argue that it was an accident, but the court may still hold her liable for the instructor's injuries since the act of swinging the club behind the instructor was intentional and reckless.

To know more about Battery visit:

https://brainly.com/question/19225854

#SPJ11

Informational justice is fostered when authorities, truthfully and candidly, explain decision-making procedures and outcomes in a comprehensive and reasonable manner.  True

Greenberg (1987) defined organizational justice as how an employee assesses the actions of the organization and the employee's subsequent attitude and behavior.  For example, if a company fires half of its employees, the individual may feel betrayed, leading in a shift in attitude and a decline in productivity.

The concept of justice or fairness relates to the idea that an action or choice is morally correct, which might be defined by ethics, religion, fairness, equity, or law. People are inherently sensitive to the fairness of events and circumstances in their daily lives, in a number of scenarios.

Learn more about Informational justice to visit this link

https://brainly.com/question/28905635

#SPJ4

Answer: A rule established by your parents

Explanation:  there is no explanation

Every state has adopted some version of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which has resulted in a more consistent and unified legal framework.

This standardization facilitates smoother commerce and reduces legal uncertainties between parties from different states. Every state in the United States has adopted some version of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC). Article 2 of the UCC establishes rules for the sale of goods in commercial transactions. It defines the rights and obligations of both the buyer and seller, including warranties, delivery, payment, and remedies for breaches of contract. The purpose of adopting Article 2 of the UCC is to provide a consistent legal framework for commercial transactions across all states.

Learn more about Uniform Commercial Code here: brainly.com/question/30334021

#SPJ11

Answer:

Explanation:

Agency by estoppel is a legal principle that arises when a principal, by their words or conduct, leads a third party to believe that another person (the agent) has the authority to act on their behalf. When this happens, the principal may be bound by an unauthorized contract made by the agent, even if the principal did not intend to give the agent authority to act.

The reason for this is that the third party, who reasonably relied on the principal's words or conduct, would suffer unfair harm or loss if the principal was allowed to deny the agent's authority after the fact. Therefore, agency by estoppel is designed to prevent unjust outcomes and promote fairness in commercial transactions.

For example, suppose a company's CEO tells a vendor that their sales manager has the authority to purchase goods on behalf of the company up to a certain amount. If the sales manager later exceeds that amount and the company refuses to pay, the vendor may be able to hold the company liable for breach of contract through an agency by estoppel. This is because the vendor relied on the CEO's representation of the sales manager's authority and would suffer harm if the company were allowed to deny it.

In summary, an agency by estoppel holds a principal liable for the actions of an agent, even if the agent's authority was not explicitly granted, to prevent unfairness and promote reliance in commercial transactions.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

The semiconductor manufacturers seeking federal subsidies from the Chips Act need to increase domestic production capacity, create more jobs and ensure that supply chains are more resilient

The Chips Act is legislation that aims to increase domestic semiconductor manufacturing capacity, as well as research and development efforts, to improve the security and resilience of semiconductor supply chains in the United States.

The legislation will provide more than $50 billion in funding for these efforts over the next five years. The Biden administration hopes that this will help to reduce reliance on foreign countries for semiconductors and ensure that the United States remains competitive in this critical area.

To learn more about chips act, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/30583648#

#SPJ11

Answer:

Exclusionary Rule

Explanation:

Dr. Gandhi's best defense is the defense of mistake. He can argue that he did not intend to embezzle the money, but made a mistake in using the hospital check for his association.

The defense of mistake is a legal defense that can be used in criminal cases where the defendant argues that they did not intend to commit the crime they are being accused of. This defense asserts that the defendant acted under a genuine belief that their actions were lawful, and therefore did not have the criminal intent necessary for a conviction.

This defense can be used in a variety of circumstances, such as when a person makes an error in judgment or misinterprets the law. For example, if a person accidentally writes a check from a company account instead of their personal account, they might be able to use the defense of mistake. The success of this defense will depend on the specific circumstances of the case and the strength of the evidence presented.

Learn more about defense of mistake here: https://brainly.com/question/28172750

#SPJ1

One of the arguments that the city government could give in support of the action or levy and collecting taxes is that small business owner are beneficiaries of public infrastructure that are installed and maintained using public funds. Hence, it is only just and equitable for them to contribute to the repair and maintenance of such facilities.

The argument that privacy advocates may give against such taxes is that they already pay Company Income Tax to the IRS. Hence this is a duplication of tax.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS)  is the revenue service for the federal government of the United States, responsible for collecting federal taxes and enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, the major body of federal statutory tax legislation.

The Internal Revenue Service is the nation's tax-collecting agency, and it is responsible for enforcing the Internal Revenue Code, which was adopted by Congress.

Learn more about taxes:
https://brainly.com/question/25783927
#SPJ1

Answer:

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is the primary agency responsible for regulating car safety in the United States.

Explanation:

The NHTSA is a division of the Department of Transportation (DOT) and is responsible for enforcing federal motor vehicle safety standards, investigating vehicle defects, and conducting research to improve vehicle safety. They also provide information to consumers about vehicle safety and ratings, and investigates complaints about vehicles and equipment. The NHTSA also has the authority to recall vehicles if they are found to have safety defects and can fine manufacturers that do not comply with safety regulations.

In the United States, automobile safety is regulated by the NHTSA. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) is in charge of ensuring the safety of automobiles and the equipment .

A Manual for Complying. Two federal agencies oversee automobiles and auto parts regulation: the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). The NHTSA is in charge of vehicle safety issues. Jack Danielson is in charge of the day-to-day operations, program offices, and mission support programs of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). He also directs the agency's eight associate administrators, chief financial officer, and chief technology officer. In order for automobile manufacturers to sell vehicles in the United States, Congress mandates that they adhere to NHTSA's bumper standards9 and vehicle safety standards8.

To learn more about NHTSA visit :

https://brainly.com/question/25228076

#SPJ4

Hi,

All legislative power in the government is vested in Congress, meaning that it is the only part of the government that can make new laws or changes existing laws. Executive Branch agencies issue regulations with the full force of law, but these are only under the authority of laws enacted by Congress.

Hope this helps! :)

Yes, the defendant's motion should be granted. Since the search warrant for the bookie's home was not supported by probable cause, the evidence seized during the search is inadmissible.

The defendant submitted a motion to suppress the evidence, contending that LASD's initial search of his residence infringed on his Fourth Amendment rights because LASD's assistance in the execution of the inspection warrant served as justification for carrying out a criminal search, making an arrest, and opening an investigation. Therefore, "Yes" is the response to the issue of whether police can search your home without a warrant. Only very seldom, without a warrant, may the police enter your private home or place of business. He contended that because the following criminal search warrant was issued as a direct result of the initial illegal search, all evidence seized and the results of that search should be removed from use at the trial.

To know more about illegal refer :

brainly.com/question/30451144

#SPJ4

Answer:

In politics, lobbying, persuasion, or interest representation is the act of lawfully attempting to influence the actions, policies, or decisions of government officials, most often legislators or members of regulatory agencies.

Explanation:

Based on the situational perspective of each sentence, the statement that the defendant is 24 years old and helps care for a one-year-old daughter, is a Mitigating factor.

A mitigating factor is a term that is used to describe the condition or situation that reduces the harshness or fault of a criminal act.

On the other hand, the aggravating factor is a term that is used to describe the situation or actions relating to a crime or offense which then raises its harshness and penalty to the aggravated version of the offense.

Therefore other statements can be categorized as the following:

2. The defendant has a prior conviction for the sale of cocaine and is on probation. - Aggravating factor

3. During the burglary, the home was occupied by an elderly couple. - Aggravating factor.

4. The burglary had been planned by the defendant’s older brother who was armed. - Aggravating factor

5. The defendant and his brother took over $10,000 in jewelry and electronics. - Aggravating factor

6. The defendant had a chaotic childhood and attended a poorly funded school. - Mitigating factor

7. The defendant wrote a letter of apology to the victim’s family. - Mitigating factor.

Hence, in this case, it is concluded that these available statements have mostly aggravating factors while three of them have mitigating factors.

Learn more about Aggravating factors here: https://brainly.com/question/14799341

#SPJ1

Answer: John Locke

Explanation: He uses a theory of natural rights to argue that governments have obligations to their citizens, have only limited powers over their citizens, and can ultimately be overthrown by citizens under certain circumstances.

Answer:

Voting is important to me because then everyone has a choice , and gets the right to vote. I think it is a important responsibility of citizenship because it's something important that mostly everyone has a choice in. Approximately 240 million people were eligible to vote in the 2020 presidential election and roughly 66.1% of them submitted ballots, totaling about 158 million. It's important to vote because we could be choosing who the next president is and that's a big deal.

Explanation:

Voting helps the citizen to select their representative in the government. The following statement explains the voting.

It is significant because, without it, citizens would not be able to choose who would lead their government. It is also an important responsibility. Those who do not vote are abdicating their civic duty. They also give over political power to opposing viewpoints.

Voting is important to me because it gives everyone a choice and the right to vote and their representative. I believe it is an important responsibility of citizenship because it is something in which almost everyone has a say. Approximately 240 million people were eligible to vote in the 2020 presidential election, with approximately 66.1 percent of them casting ballots, totaling approximately 158 million. It is critical to vote because we may be deciding who the next president will be, which is a big deal.

Therefore, the above statements explain the importance of voting.

Learn more about the importance of voting here:

https://brainly.com/question/3084292

The arguments that the might the city government give in support for this action is that those small business that have defaulted in their payment are robbing the citizen of some basic amenities since the taxes is what is used to develop that place.

The argument that privacy advocates give against it is that small business are just coming up and they cannot pay that outrageous sum of money instead the tax should be reduce so as to accommodate them.

IRS forms are the written reports that people and corporations submit to the federal government detailing all of their financial transactions in order to determine their tax obligations.

Therefore, A fundamental method for nations to produce public revenues that enable them to support investments in human capital, infrastructure, and the provision of services for citizens and businesses is through the collection of taxes and levies.

Learn more about taxes from

https://brainly.com/question/1133253
#SPJ1

If the defendant has failed to correct the issues within 120 days of the date of the inspection, it is likely that the court will take action.

This could include ordering the defendant to make the necessary repairs, or to pay a fine for not complying with the inspection order.

The court may also order the defendant to pay for the costs of the inspection, and to pay any other damages that may have been caused due to the negligence of the defendant.

In some cases, the court may even order the defendant to vacate the premises until the repairs have been completed. Ultimately, the court will use its discretion in determining the appropriate action to take.

Know more about costs  here

https://brainly.com/question/30045916#

#SPJ11

The main differences between a presidential system and a parliamentary system lie in the separation of powers, the role of the executive and legislative branches, and the process of government formation and accountability. In a presidential system, the president is elected separately from the legislature, often through direct popular vote. In a parliamentary system, the head of government is typically chosen from within the legislature, either by the members themselves or by the monarch or president on their advice.

In a presidential system, the executive branch is separate from the legislative branch. The president is the head of state and government, elected by the people, and has significant powers and authority. The president serves as the chief executive, making decisions and implementing policies. The legislative branch, consisting of the Congress or Parliament, is responsible for making laws and conducting oversight. The executive and legislative branches operate independently and have separate sources of legitimacy.

In contrast, a parliamentary system has a fusion of powers between the executive and legislative branches. The head of government, typically known as the prime minister, is chosen from the majority party or coalition in the legislature. The prime minister and the cabinet are accountable to the legislature and depend on its support to stay in power. The executive branch is not separate from the legislative branch but is formed and sustained by it.

Another key difference is the process of government formation. In a presidential system, the president is elected separately from the legislature, often through direct popular vote. In a parliamentary system, the head of government is typically chosen from within the legislature, either by the members themselves or by the monarch or president on their advice.

Learn more about legislature here:

brainly.com/question/33438263

#SPJ11

The relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

The theory of price states that, the price is affected by various factors in the market and these factors can influence the price of the product.

The factors may be as follows  -

Thus, the relationship between a product and its price is that as the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up. Thus, Option C is the correct statement.

Learn more about price at:

brainly.com/question/26075805

#SPJ1

Full Question:

Although part of your question is missing, you might be referring to this full question:

The graph shows the market for graphic T-shirts.

What does the graph show about the relationship between a product and its price?

As the amount of a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the amount of a product goes down, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes up, the price goes up.

As the interest in a product goes down, the price goes up.

See attached image.

Answer:

social change happens by getting into a relationship, having a friend, new electronics

Explanation:

Answer:

a) The parties to the contract know too much about their particular interests and as a result, the terms of the contract are not necessarily fair.

Explanation:

Answer:

interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed

Explanation:

The judiciary is such a body that interprets the Constitution and ensures the provisions are followed. Besides, in federal states, disputes between the Centre and States are common and natural. The judiciary also resolves the disputes between the Centre and States as well as between the States.

The statement ''that drivers on unpaved roads must always yield the right-of-way to drivers on paved roads'' is false. So, the correct choice is option B.

The right-of-way rules are not determined based on the type of road surface. Instead, right-of-way rules prioritize the safety and efficiency of traffic flow in various situations, regardless of whether the road is paved or unpaved.

Right-of-way rules typically consider factors such as traffic signs, traffic signals, intersection configurations, and specific driving scenarios to determine which driver has the right to proceed first. These rules are meant to ensure orderly and safe movement of vehicles on the roads.

While it is true that in some situations, drivers on unpaved roads may be required to yield the right-of-way, it is not an absolute rule that always applies. The specific circumstances and applicable traffic laws or regulations dictate who has the right-of-way in a given situation, regardless of the road surface type.

It is important for all drivers to be familiar with and follow the right-of-way rules applicable in their jurisdiction to ensure safe and efficient traffic flow.  Hence, the correct option is B (False).

For more questions on unpaved roads

https://brainly.com/question/31939162

#SPJ8

Answer:

We all want a cri- justice system that's sensible, effective, and creates a safe society with less cr*me

Explanation:

Answer:

i actually dont think that death penalty should be legal. unless the person killed BILLIONS AND BILLIONS of innocent people or did so many bad things that police and stuff even lost track,i think that anyone should go on death row. (or whatever its called). poeple that go to prison for years still have a chance at life. they have a chance to change and stuff.

i think that a . death penalty for ANYONE is too harsh

thats my opinion :)