Answer:
Where are the options
i. need. option. to pickkkk
What is drug decriminalize
Explanation:
not charging those caught with small amounts of recreational drugs
Rulemaking is the process by which laws or mandates approved by legislatures are turned into detailed written instructions on what public agencies will or will not do. True or False
True. Rulemaking is the process by which government agencies implement and enforce laws or mandates passed by legislatures.
It involves the creation of detailed written instructions on how these laws will be put into practice and what actions will be taken by public agencies to ensure compliance. This process typically involves public notice and comment periods, during which interested parties can provide input on the proposed rules before they are finalized. Once the rules are established, they have the force of law and can be enforced by the agency responsible for implementing them. Rulemaking is an important part of the regulatory process, as it ensures that laws are implemented fairly and consistently across different agencies and jurisdictions. It also provides transparency and accountability by allowing for public input and review of agency actions. Overall, rulemaking plays a critical role in the functioning of our government and helps to ensure that laws are effectively implemented and enforced.
Learn more about government :
https://brainly.com/question/16940043
#SPJ11
Explain in detail how lobbyists impact the laws that are written.
Answer:
Lobbyists help inform Congress and the public about problems and issues. Lobbyists provide technical information about legislative proposals. And lobbyists let lawmakers know whom a bill would help and whom it would hurt.
Explanation:
A
system is a labor system in which a prison buys machinery and raw material with
which incarcerated individuals manufactured a salable product.
O a. public works and ways
O b. state-use
O c. public account
O d. piece price
Option (c), A labor system known as a "Public Account system" involved a jail purchasing equipment and raw materials to enable convicts to produce a marketable commodity.
What separates the Consolidated Fund from the Public Account?The consolidated Fund is further divided into "Revenue" and "Capital" divisions. The Public Account receives all additional cash acquired by the government or on its behalf. The contingency fund enables the Government to pay unforeseen costs that cannot wait for parliamentary approval.
What are public accounts composed of?The money that is received on behalf of the Government is referred to as the Public Account in Article 266 of the Constitution. Money put in a public account is not the property of the government and must eventually be returned to the people and organizations that made the deposit.
Learn more about consolidated Fund: https://brainly.com/question/28583417
#SPJ1
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president biden relating to what kind of debt?.
A federal appeals court recently halted a proposal by president Biden relating to student loan forgiveness plan of debt.
On the same day that a judge dismissed a Republican-led lawsuit by six states contesting the loan-forgiveness scheme, a U.S. appeals court temporarily stopped President Joe Biden's plan to cancel billions of dollars in college student debt.The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered an immediate stay prohibiting any student debt discharge under the program until the court resolves on the states' request for a longer-term injunction while the ruling against them is reviewed.While the six Republican-led states posed "important and significant challenges to the debt relief plan," U.S. District Judge Henry Autrey in St. Louis dismissed their complaint on Thursday, claiming they had the proper legal standing to prosecute the case.Thus the answer is student loan forgiveness plan.
Refer here to learn more about federal appeals court: https://brainly.com/question/24978344
#SPJ4
After reading the Dan & Me and the Brene Brown Gun Rights articles, what are your general thoughts? How can you, personally, learn about other people's perspectives (particularly in areas you know you will disagree), and still be open to learning?
Few strategies that can employ to approach such situations are Approach with an open mind, Active listening and reading, Seek diverse sources, Empathy and perspective-taking, Empathy and perspective-taking, Constructive dialogue, Challenge your assumptions.
Understanding and learning from different perspectives, especially when you anticipate disagreement, is an essential aspect of intellectual growth and fostering empathy. Here are a few strategies you can employ to approach such situations
Maintain an open and curious mindset when encountering viewpoints that differ from your own. Recognize that everyone has unique life experiences and beliefs that shape their perspectives.
Engage in active listening or reading when exploring different perspectives. Take the time to understand the underlying motivations, values, and experiences that inform someone's viewpoint. Seek to comprehend their reasoning rather than immediately dismiss or invalidate their stance.
Make a conscious effort to seek out diverse sources of information, including those that represent viewpoints contrary to your own. Read articles, books, and listen to podcasts or interviews from a range of authors, experts, and individuals who hold different beliefs. This exposure can help you gain a broader understanding of the issue.
Put yourself in the shoes of those who hold opposing viewpoints. Try to understand their emotions, fears, and concerns. This exercise in empathy can foster compassion and provide insight into why people hold particular beliefs.
Engage in respectful and constructive dialogue with individuals who hold different perspectives. Focus on active listening, asking questions, and seeking common ground. While you may not change your beliefs, you can gain a better understanding of others' positions and foster mutual respect.
Be willing to challenge your own assumptions and biases. Reflect on why you hold certain beliefs and consider alternative perspectives that challenge your own. This self-reflection can lead to personal growth and a more nuanced understanding of complex issues.
To know more about strategies here
https://brainly.com/question/28338759
#SPJ4
When turning your vehicle you do what?
When turning a vehicle, the driver should signal the intended direction, check mirrors and blind spots, slow down, and steer the vehicle smoothly and safely into the desired lane or direction. It's important to maintain proper control of the vehicle.
While turning, where should you be on the road?Unless road signs and markings indicate otherwise, while there are three lanes, when wanting to: Keep to the left-hand lane when you turn left. To stick to the left or centre lane, follow the road in front of you. Turn right and quickly get into the right lane.
Which direction should your car be turned?Always move with caution and pay great attention to your surroundings. Turn the wheel in the direction you want the back of the automobile to move to drive the vehicle in reverse. The back of the automobile is directed to the right by turning the steering wheel to the right. Turning the wheel to the left is how you steer.
To know more about vehicle visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/27981487
#SPJ1
Jason parked his car on a back street and walked to the bank. When he returned to his vehicle, the entire side of the car had been damaged. No one had witnessed the accident. Would any insurance coverage pay for the damages in this hit and run case? If so, what type?
Answer:
maybe something will help)
Explanation:
Insurance coverage for hit-and-run accidents can be categorized into two types: property damage coverages and bodily injury coverages. Here's how auto insurance may cover a hit-and-run, depending on which coverages you have.
Collision: Collision coverage protects you against any physical damage to your car that was caused by impact with another vehicle or a stationary object, regardless of fault. If your vehicle is damaged in a hit-and-run, collision will help cover the cost to repair or replace it after paying your deductible. Collision coverage is optional, but if you have a car loan or lease, it's probably required by your lender.
Generally, if you're involved in a hit-and-run accident, Medical Payments Coverage (also known as Med Pay) can cover medical expenses related to injuries to you or your passengers from an accident involving your vehicle, up to your policy limits. Typically, Med Pay coverage is optional. Med Pay may also cover you as a pedestrian if you are injured when a vehicle hits you. Coverages do vary by state, so be sure to check with your Travelers representative or local independent agent to verify what your policy covers.
Several persons together stole a painting from an art museum. One of them, who was the driver, was caught during the commission of another crime. He told police that "I didn't even get any money from the art museum. It all went to the first guy and the second guy." When the first and second guy go on trial for the theft of the art painting, is the driver's statement admissible in court?
Answer:
If the driver's statement was voluntarily obtained by the police without duress, then the statement will be admissible. But, if otherwise, it cannot be admitted. Such self-incriminating statements are usually used as evidence for police to arrest a suspect, but to convict. This is why at the point of arrest, the suspect is read his or her "rights to remain silent."
Explanation:
It is the responsibility of the trial judge to determine any issues as to the statement's voluntariness. This implies that the confession can be admitted into evidence if the judge determines that the confession was voluntarily made by the driver. The judge will not admit the statement if it is determined that there were some use of threats of force, violence, or intimidation on the part of the police to obtain the self-incriminating confession.
The unlawful taking or attempted taking of property that is in the
immediate possession of another, by force or the threat of force, is
known as
olarceny-theft.
O robbery.
O burglary.
O aggravated assault
Jurisdiction refers to witch of the following
Answer:
in Parliament refers to justice
Explanation:
Mark brainliest
true/false. failure to stop for a school bus and passing the bus on the side that children enter and exit when the school bus displays a stop signal will result in a fine of $265.
The statement is true. Failure to stop for a school bus and passing the bus on the side that children enter and exit when the school bus displays a stop signal will result in a fine of $265.
According to Florida Traffic school, Within 30 days of receiving their traffic ticket, drivers must voluntarily choose to take a basic driving improvement course. If they fail to vote, they forfeit their chance to choose the school, and points are deducted. The driver is required to pay the traffic ticket's fine and penalties within the allotted 30-day time frame. Drivers must notify the court of their decision to enrol in basic driver improvement training after making payment. Their licence will be suspended for nonpayment if the fee is not paid in 30 days. The traffic school course must be finished by drivers within the time frame specified by the court. The failure to complete the court-mandated period will result in the suspension of their licence.
Learn more about Florida here:
https://brainly.com/question/1156848
#SPJ4
What does "salvaging redeemable offenders" mean?
What is Islamic management?
Islamic Management can be defined as an emerging discipline which deals with the management of organizations from the area of the knowledge received from the revealed and other Islamic sources of knowledge. Results in applications compatible with the Islamic beliefs and practices.
Islamic management can also define as means conducting activities depending upon the guidance of Allah and following his Prophet (Peace Be Upon Him) with an accountable mentality, integrity and skills to achieve an objective.
The law that requires all tax clients review a privacy notice is:A.) USA PATRIOT ActB.) Gramm – Leach – Bliley ActC.) Privacy Protection ActD.) Equal Credit Opportunity ActE.) None of the above.
Gramm – Leach – Bliley Act. The Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act (GLBA), also known as the Financial Modernization Act of 1999, is a federal law that requires financial institutions to explain how they share and protect client information.
What is financial institutions?Financial institutions are entities that provide a range of services to individuals, businesses, and governments, such as loans, investments, payment processing, and asset management. Examples of financial institutions include banks, credit unions, investment firms, and insurance companies. These institutions play a crucial role in providing access to capital, enabling individuals and businesses to invest and grow. Financial institutions are heavily regulated and must adhere to a range of laws to protect consumer interests and ensure the safety of their assets. As such, financial institutions are held to a higher standard than other businesses, and are subject to increased scrutiny and oversight.
To learn more about financial institutions
https://brainly.com/question/28330139
#SPJ4
Which of the following is an advantage of being a sole trader?
Select one:
a. the owner has unlimited liability
b. the business has limited life
c. the owner has total autonomy over business decisions
d. the business is not a separate legal entity
A right not to be interfered with in obtaining something is known as a.
2. How many police officers die each year?
Answer:
According to the FBI database, there are an average of 64 police officers dying per year.
What is meant by the substitute judgement ?
Answer: See explanation
Explanation:
Substituted judgment simply refers to a decision that is made by an individual on behalf of someone else who is considered to be incompetent and therefore unable to make a decision for himself or herself.
In such scenario, the decision-maker trhes as much as possible to be accurate and make a decision with facts on behalf of the incompetent person.
Please use caucion when entering this area as the floor can be slippary.
Making a legal arrest, gaining information for warrants, or even preventing crime can all be the result of:
a.
entrapment.
b.
surveillance.
c.
pretextual traffic stops.
d.
criminal profiling.
Can atheists get insurance policies that cover acts of God?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
nor can relgious people.Most general insurance plans do not cover acts of god.
Answer:
no they will not do in that way hope it's helpful to you and Mark me as brainlist
How have the following Supreme Court decisions influenced how affirmative action policies are evaluated?a. Lawrence v. Texas (2003)b. Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)c. Adarand Constructors v. Peña (1995)d. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)
Yes. The decision altered affirmative action policies. These Supreme Court cases aided in the development of the legal framework for assessing affirmative action measures. They created the notion that racial policies must be narrowly tailored in order to achieve a compelling government interest.
Texas v. Lawrence (2003) - This decision overturned a Texas law that made homosexual behaviour illegal.
Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) - In this decision, the Supreme Court backed the University of Michigan Law School's use of race as a criterion in admissions.
Adarand Constructors v. Pea (1995) - In this decision, the Supreme Court stated that any racial classifications imposed by the government must be subjected to strict scrutiny.
Bakke v. Regents of the University of California (1978) - In this case, the Supreme Court invalidated a quota system set up by the University of California Medical School to admit minority students.
For such more question on Supreme Court:
brainly.com/question/30328493
#SPJ4
What do you think would happen if one group of people got to make laws, enforce them, decide what the laws mean, AND judge whether someone had broken a law?
Answer:
The rich would be powerful,
Explanation:
There would be no rights for middle class/poor.And we would all be slaves to the rich.And you could never be proven innocent
Answer: It could lead to very unfair things, and one group might try taking advantage of their power.
is law civics if so
What role is exemplified by the President vetoing a bill that was passed by Congress? Chief Diplomat Chief of State Chief Executive Chief Legislator
answer: Chief Legislator
A program manager implemented a new policy designed to increase productivity. Productivity went up after the new policy was implemented. on Based on the above statements, is the following conclusion true, false, or is there not enough information to determine? The new policy designed to increase productivity worked. O True O False O Not Enough Information
True, the new policy designed to increase productivity worked. Based solely on the information given, we can conclude that the new policy was successful in increasing productivity.
The given statements suggest that a program manager implemented a new policy aimed at increasing productivity. After the implementation of the new policy, productivity went up. From these statements, we can infer that the new policy had a positive impact on productivity.
While it's possible that other factors could have contributed to the increase in productivity, the information provided supports the conclusion that the new policy was effective in achieving its intended goal of increasing productivity.
Of course, there may be additional details or data that could shed further light on the situation. For example, it would be useful to know more about the specific policy that was implemented, as well as how the program manager measured productivity before and after the policy was put in place.
Learn more about productivity: https://brainly.com/question/30333196.
#SPJ11
can someone help me with this question please.
Assuming that each of the following pieces of evidence is admissible, including a reliably documented chain of custody, which would NOT be useful in determining the facts of the case?
A. A photograph of the crime scene
B. Matching DNA test from blood at the scene and a hair sample from a suspect
C. An eye witness who says she thought she recognized that someone at the scene looks like the accused
D. A neighbor who says that the accused was known to have drugs when she was in high school
Answer: C
Explanation: The women wouldn’t be helpful cause she thought she saw a suspect but she didn’t cause she don’t remember. if she doesn’t remember then she would be useful at all
Investments can make businesses more productive by:
O A. allowing them to ignore the limits of production possibilities
curves.
B. increasing the amount of input needed to create a certain output.
C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
D. removing most opportunity costs for making economic choices.
Answer: C. giving them resources to produce goods more efficiently.
Explanation:
I just took the quiz, C is correct! :)
The state tax incentive is an example of":
Answer:
mortgage interest deduction
Under authority delegated from Congress, the Federal Communications Commission puts out new administrative rules that regulate the practices of Internet Service Providers as they relate to consumer privacy. Assume that Congress overturns these rules under the Congressional Review Act, but that Governor Steel of Ohio thinks that the rules have merit. Acting under his authority as Governor, he issues an executive order telling Ohio Internet Service Providers to adhere to the now voided federal guidelines and ignore Congress’s actions. In response, Congress passes a new law called the "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights" that contradicts Ohio's approach. Which law wins?
Group of answer choices
a) Neither law wins; when laws conflict, both are automatically void under the Preemption Clause.
b) Governor Steel’s executive order wins, since executive actions always trump Congressional rulemaking under the Preemption Clause
c) Congress wins, since federal law trump contrary state executive actions under the Preemption Clause
d) It is impossible to say under the facts provided
Congress wins, since federal law trumps contrary state executive actions under the Preemption Clause wins here. The correct option is c.
Federal law typically takes precedence over conflicting state laws or executive actions under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In this case, Governor Steel's executive order in Ohio is in conflict with a new law that Congress passed known as the "Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights." Thus the law passed by Congress would take precedence over the executive order.
By stating that conflicting state laws or actions take precedent over federal law, the Preemption Clause further solidifies this idea. As a result, the recently passed federal law would be viewed as incompatible with the Ohio executive order's attempt to enforce null and void federal regulations.
Although it is the job of the courts to interpret and apply the law in these situations, it is reasonable to infer that the Consumer Privacy Bill of Rights passed by Congress would take precedence over the executive order signed by Ohio Governor Steel.
Learn more about federal law at:
brainly.com/question/14867447
#SPJ4