Write a 5-6 sentence paragraph to express how the rights listed above would protect Dominic from the crime he has been accused of. This should be done on a separate piece of line paper.
Dominic is an African American man who lives with his White roommate Keith. Dominic comes home one day and the police are waiting for him with Keith. The police went into his home and found evidence implicating him, from what they have said, in stealing a car that has gone missing. The police immediately blame Dominic and arrest him, taking his car as well. Dominic waits two years in prison, not being allowed to leave, until he is finally given a trial with police members as the jury. At the trial, Dominic argues for himself that he did not do and that there is no proof. He is declared innocent, but the police later bring him back and declare him guilty of the crime, declaring his punishment that he can never go within ten feet of a car again.



Within this scenario, there are TEN different violations of due process rights from the different amendments. For your paragraph, you can reflect on the following to meet your requirements:

List three rights violated here.
Explain how these three rights were violated.
Describe how using his rights would have helped Dominic in this situatio

Answer:

False.

Reason:

it seems to make sense that you can talk about the case out side the court room.

Answer:

false

Explanation:

Answer:

one's dysfunctional(D) and the other is functional(F). just kidding!

D is an "out of hand" fight where both members are yelling. F is a controlled fight that both members of the conflict are both calm and are both calmly discussing solutions to the conflict.

Explanation:

Answer:

False

Explanation:

Quizlet - Unit 6 Lesson 3: Procedures When Involved In An Accident

First question.

In general, when a corporation has not been formally incorporated, the individuals involved may be personally liable for any contracts entered into on behalf of the corporation. This situation is often referred to as "pre-incorporation contracts" or "contracts made by promoters."

In the given scenario, Linda entered into a contract with Mike on behalf of the corporation that was intended to be formed. However, since the incorporation process failed, the corporation does not exist as a separate legal entity. As a result, Linda may be personally liable for the contract with Mike.

Therefore, it's important to note that the specifics of contract law and personal liability may vary depending on the jurisdiction.

For more information regarding the corporation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30029715

#SPJ1

Explanation:

The matching bloody gloves found at the murder scene and outside Simpson's home

9:36 P.M. Simpson, wearing a dark sweat suit, is seen by Kato Kaelin.

9:30-9:45 Charles Cale, walking his dog by Simpson's Rockingham residence, does not see Bronco.

10:02 Simpson attempts to call Paula Barbieri on the cell phone from his Bronco.

10:15 (prosecution)-10:40 (defense) Period during which murders took place.

10:22-10:30 Limo driver Allan Park, scheduled to take Simpson to airport, does not see Bronco on Rockingham.

10:40, 10:43, 10:49 Allan Park buzzes Simpson's intercom, but gets no response.

10:50 White or light bronco observed at the intersection of Bundy and Dorothy.

10:51 or 10:52 Kato Kaelin hears three thumps on the wall outside his room.

10:54 Allan Park sees a man wearing dark clothes, about 6-feet tall and 200 pounds, walk across the driveway of the Simpson residence.

10:55 Simpson lies to Allan Park.

1. The 9-1-1 call and the history of Simpson's violence directed at Nicole Brown.

2. Hair evidence: (1) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on cap at Bundy residence, (2) hairs consistent with that of Simpson found on Ron Goldman's shirt.

3. Fiber evidence: (1) cotton fibers consistent with the carpet in the Bronco found on glove at Rockingham, (2) fibers consistent with the carpet from the Bronco found on cap at Bundy residence.

4. Blood evidence: (1) killer dropped blood near shoe prints at Bundy, (2) blood dropped at Bundy was of same type as Simpson's (about 0.5% of population would match), (3) Simpson had fresh cuts on left hand on day after murder, (4) blood found in Bronco, (5) blood found in foyer and master bedroom of Simpson home, (5) blood found on Simpson's driveway, (6) blood on socks in OJ's home matched Nicole's.

5. Glove evidence: (1) left glove found at Bundy and right glove found at Simpson residence are Aris Light gloves, size XL, (2) Nicole Brown bought pair of Aris Light XL gloves in 1990 at Bloomingdale's, (3) Simpson wore Aris Light gloves from 1990 to June, 1994.

6. Shoe evidence: (1) shoe prints found at Bundy were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, (2) bloody shoe impression on Bronco carpet is consistent with a Magli shoe, (3) Simpson wore a size 12 shoe.

7. Other evidence: (1) flight in Bronco, (2) strange reaction to phone call informing him of Nicole Brown's death, etc.

1. Simpson did not testify at his criminal trial. Defense attorneys will almost always call as a witness an articulate client that they believe to be innocent.

2. Subsequent to the trial defense attorneys talking about the trial have been careful to say "the jury did the right thing," while not stating that Simpson was in fact innocent.

3. Subsequent to the trial, Simpson has devoted no real effort to tracking down the "real killer," nor has any significant evidence surfaced suggesting that the killer was anyone other than Simpson.

4. The jury was not allowed to hear testimony concerning Simpson's rumored jailhouse confession to Rosie Grier.

5. Subsequent to the criminal trial other evidence of Simpson's guilt surfaced. The most significant of the new evidence may have been photographs of Simpson wearing Bruno Magli shoes. The new evidence, together with much of the evidence considered in the criminal trial, convinced a civil jury that Simpson murdered Nicole Brown and Ronald Goldman.

6. In his 2007 book, If I Did It, Simpson (for all intents and purposes) confessed. The book describes in detail events leading up to the moment of the murders

Answer:

If you read his book, he almost confesses. He was in a bad relationship with Nicole. John Cochrane used the words: If the glove does not fit, you must acquit."

Explanation:

He was found not guilty of the June 13 crime (1994)

He ran and a lengthy car chase was found to be incriminating evidence.

There has been no jury to convict him of these murders.
DNA - lots of blood found in, around, car and home of OJ that belonged to Goldman. Some blood was found inside OJs car that was a mixture of Goldman and his own. The chase lasted for 4 hours. Why run if you are not guilty? Try to include a lot about how he changed his alibi - was he really asleep, did Rosa the housekeeper really see him or did she see his car? She confessed on the stand that she could not be sure whether his car was there or not. Just because Simpson had jealous rages against Nicole and Goldman, Nicole had a taped 911 call where she was calling because he was trying to harm her. He supposedly hit her, stalked her, degraded her, and it was know he was capable of murder. There is a book that describes his hypothetical reasoning behind if he did it or not. He mocked the fact that the gloves did not fit and joked about how he would have used gloves that fit and they would have been his "good" gloves. He called his gloves his lucky gloves and if he was going to stab someone like his wife, then he would have used his lucky gloves.

He also told Nicole that he would kill her one day and get away with it. This is something that Caitlyn Jenner (aka Bruce Jenner) stated. Jenner reacted as if OJ was guilty. If you get the chance to see the video one day of him attempting to escape in his bronco - it is worth the watch.

His defense attorneys said he was wrongly accused.
He was a controlling husband, but the prosecutors pointed to the fact that blood from the crime scene was in OJ's car and home. Duh!
The gloves did not fit, therefore, they determined that he could not be found guilty.

Just so you understand that a verdict of being acquitted does not mean he did not do it, it just means that it could not be proven that he did do it. He was found guilty by a civil jury for wrongful death and ended up paying the brown and Goldman families a boat load of money. Later you will see that he was arrested and sent to prison for kidnapping and armed robbery. He broke the law and his behaviors that were displayed fit the profile of someone who could commit murder. I work in the system and the system is broken, but we are all working to make it better. We cannot fix it, but we can attempt to make changes that need to be made. Simpson apologized for the kidnapping and all that, but the fact that he brought a gun with him, is an identifier of the behavior of what he could have intended to do. Was there intent when he brought a gun? Sure.

Answer:

why would you change the power of the president? is this a test or quiz question, because if so I can answer it

Explanation:

Question 1: Project Life Cycle Stages The project life cycle consists of distinct phases that a project progresses through from initiation to closure. The common stages are: Initiation, Planning, Execution, Monitoring and Control, Closure.

Question 2: Define Scope Theory The define scope theory involves clearly defining the boundaries and deliverables of the project. It includes:

Scope Planning, Scope Definition, Scope Verification, Scope Change Control.

Question 3: Project Time Management Process , Project time management involves planning and controlling the project schedule. The processes include:

Activity Definition, Activity Sequencing, Activity Duration Estimating, Schedule Development, Schedule Control

Question 4: SWOT Technique, The SWOT technique is a strategic analysis tool used to assess the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to a project.

Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats

Question 5: Common Risk Response Strategies , Risk response strategies are used to address identified project risks. Some common strategies include:

Avoidance, Mitigation, Transfer, Acceptance

Learn more about Scope

https://brainly.com/question/30088177

#SPJ11

It can be debatable whether or young offenders' fingerprints and pictures can be taken without their consent. The use of a minor's fingerprints in a criminal prosecution or conviction may result in stigmatization.

Criminal law: Nothing committed by a child under the age of seven constitutes a crime according to the Indian Penal Code. If it is determined that the kid has not yet developed the capacity to comprehend the nature and implications of his act, the age of criminal liability is increased to 12 years.

Juvenile refers to youngsters who are under the age and developmental stage of adults. Juvenile Justice (Care) Act For the purposes of a criminal prosecution and punishment in a court of law, a juvenile shall not be treated as an adult under the Juvenile Justice Act of 2000.

To know more about criminal prosecution visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/30648159

Doctrine applies in construction contracts and means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for Substantial performance Therefore the correct option is D.

Substantial performance is a doctrine that applies in construction contracts, and it means that the constructed building is, for practical purposes, just as good as the one contracted for. This doctrine focuses on the idea of whether or not, even if there are minor mistakes or issues with the building's quality,

it still provides substantial performance to meet the standard of what was contracted for. The concept here is that if the overall quality of a building is close enough to meet the contract specifications and acceptable construction code requirements then any minor deficiencies can be overlooked.

Hence the correct option is D

To know more about Substantial performance visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29434580

#SPJ4

Fixed Term Length. This is the first detail. This is the period when you accept leaving a certain amount of money deposited in order to avoid receiving a penalty. The period will end on the agreed date of maturity. This is when the certificate of deposit has matured and is ready to be withdrawn penalty free.

Fixed  Date Of Withdrawal. This is the second detail, also known as the maturity date.  After the period agreed upon ends, the account matures and the money is legible to be withdrawn now. One could choose to withdraw the whole amount or leave a little in the CD for another period of investment.

Consider reading more about certificate of deposit here:

https://brainly.com/question/29789676

#SPJ4

Answer:

Amherst College

Explanation:

Answer:

Accessory, in criminal law, a person who becomes equally guilty in the crime of another by knowingly and voluntarily aiding the criminal before or after the crime. An accessory is one kind of accomplice, the other being an abettor, who aids the criminal during the act itself.

Explanation:

hope it'll be useful

Answer:

Unemployment of masses of people; rapid urbanisation; unbalanced development

Explanation:

Answer:

checks and balances.

Explanation:

Checks and balances refers to a system that is typically used in a democratic society to enforce a balance of power between the three (3) arms of government; executive, judiciary and legislative arm. These checks and balances are really important and necessary so as to ensure there wouldn't be an abuse of power by any of arm of government.

Hence, the senate refusing to ratify a treaty, the president vetoing a law, and the senate rejecting the nomination of a supreme court justice are all examples of checks and balances.

The one among the statements that i a question of fact is Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light.

For better understanding, lets explain what question of fact means

From the above, we can therefore say that the answer is that the one among the statements that a question of fact is  Whether a vehicle ran a traffic light, is correct

Learn more about question of fact from:

https://brainly.com/question/13857186

Many reform movements sprang up in the 1800s, and eventually, it resulted in women's right to vote. The Women's Rights Movement was an American civil rights movement that began in the mid-nineteenth century and lasted until 1920 when the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, granting women the right to vote.

The campaign for women's rights in the United States was at its peak in the late 19th century and early 20th century. The women's rights movement emerged from the women's suffrage movement, which was a movement that sought to grant women the right to vote. Women were inspired by the abolition movement to seek greater political and legal rights and used its strategies to advance their own cause.The Seneca Falls Convention was the first women's rights convention held in the United States, and it was held in Seneca Falls, New York, on July 19-20, 1848. The convention was organized by Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Lucretia Mott, and others, and it was attended by more than 300 people. It was at this convention that the Declaration of Sentiments, which called for women's suffrage and other women's rights, was signed.

In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the women's suffrage movement gained momentum, and women became more involved in political activism. They organized marches, rallies, and other events to raise awareness of women's issues. The movement also had the support of many men, who saw women's rights as an important social issue.In 1920, the 19th Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified, granting women the right to vote. This was a significant milestone in the women's rights movement, but it was only the beginning of a long struggle for gender equality in the United States. Women continued to fight for equal rights in the workplace, education, and other areas, and the women's rights movement continues to this day.

To know more about right to vote visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29759734

#SPJ11

According to O*NET, some common tasks performed by Lawyers are:

In legal matters and disputes, a lawyer advises and represents businesses, individuals, and government agencies. The primary responsibilities of a lawyer are to uphold the law while protecting the rights of their clients.

Lawyers provide legal advice, conduct research, and gather evidence or information, draft legal documents such as contracts, divorce decrees, or real estate transactions, and defend or prosecute in court. Lawyers can practice in a variety of areas, including corporate, family, bankruptcy, and environmental law.

Read more about Lawyers

brainly.com/question/20397360

#SPJ1

A description of the responsibilities the offices of the House General Counsel and Senate Legal Counsel played in these investigations is included in the report's conclusion.

What are examples responsibilities?

An obligation to complete a task is one example of a responsibility. Your parents, for instance, anticipate that you will brush your teeth. It is your job to clean your teeth every day since it is "a responsibility" to do so. Another illustration is that your teacher anticipates you to complete your homework promptly and to the best of your ability. Therefore, it is your duty to complete your assignment and do it to the best of your ability.

A duty could be how you are required to behave. For instance, if you go play at the park, your parents anticipate that you won't play in a way that endangers you or another else.

Know more about conclusion visit:

https://brainly.com/question/78686

#SPJ1

Answer:

example of : public defenders

One of the six arguments that can be employed in the defense against a criminal indictment My client did it but is insane.

Self-protection, entrapment, insanity, necessity, and respondent superior are a few examples of affirmative defenses. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56, any celebration may also make a movement for precis judgment on an affirmative protection from court.

Some not unusual place procedural defenses are entrapment via way of means of the government, fake confession via way of means of witnesses, falsified evidence, denial of a fast trial, double jeopardy, prosecutorial misconduct, and selective prosecution.

The human frame has 3 number one traces of protection to combat in opposition to overseas invaders, which include viruses, bacteria, and fungi. The immune system's 3 traces of protection include bodily and chemical barriers, non-unique innate responses, and unique adaptive responses.

Learn more about court here:

https://brainly.com/question/26318342

#SPJ9

Answer:

you'll go to jail

Explanation:

Answer:

By mutual understanding and cooperation.

Explanation:

Ethical dilemmas are evaluated by the individual when they work for their own interest and affect the other individual. For example, by taking the credit of other's work. In this example, one individual takes the advantage of the situation which is totally unethical. Such type of ethical dilemmas are resolved by the mutual understanding and cooperation of the two parties. Factors that are involved in creating ethical dilemmas are achieving personal goals and make advantage of a situation for your own profit and interest.

Answer:

a. the senate

Explanation:

the senate approves the governors appointment of judges

Answer:

c the voters

Explanation:

Answer:

The correct option is;

It commits you to paying your loan

Explanation:

A mortgage note is a note promising to repay a stipulated amount of money as well as interest incurred at a stipulated rate at an agreed time in order to live up to the terms of the promise

The mortgage note outlines the debt and the interest rate and requires the borrower, that is the signatory to the note individually responsible for the repayment of the mortgage

Therefore, the correct option is that it commits you to paying your loan.

The best description of the mortgage note is B. It lists all costs associated with your loan.

A mortgage note is a promising note that stipulates the:

Thus, while signing the mortgage note commits the borrower to pay off the loan with interest, the best description of the mortgage note is that it lists all costs associated with the loan.

Learn more about the mortgage note at https://brainly.com/question/1318711

Answer: Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment. UCC governs contractual transaction with goods and tangible objects (such as a purchase of a car).

Explanation:

Answer:

Common law governs contractual transactions with real estate, services, insurance, intangible assets and employment.

Explanation: